Role of an ideomotor mechanism in number processing

Experimental Psychology

Volumn 60, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 34-43

  Badets, Arnaud ^a   Koch, Iring ^c   Toussaint, Lucette ^a,b  

^a Centre National de La Recherche Scientifique   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE POITIERS   (France)

^c RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ideomotor principle; Number processing; Sensory integration

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84873811027     PISSN: 16183169     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000171     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Andres, M., Olivier, E., & Badets, A. (2008). Action, words and numbers: A motor contribution to semantic processing? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 313-317.
2. Andres, M., Ostry, D. J., Nicol, F., & Paus, T. (2008). Time course of number magnitude interference during grasping. Cortex, 44, 414-419.
3. Badets, A., Andres, M., Di Luca, S., & Pesenti, M. (2007). Number magnitude potentiates action judgment. Experimental Brain Research, 180, 525-534.
4. Badets, A., & Pesenti, M. (2010). Creating number semantics through finger movement perception. Cognition, 115, 46-53.
5. Badets, A., & Pesenti, M. (2011). Finger-number interaction: An ideomotor account. Experimental Psychology, 58, 287-292.
6. Badets, A., Pesenti, M., & Olivier, E. (2010). Response-effect compatibility of finger-numeral configurations in arithmetical context. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 16-22.
7. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577-609.
8. Butterworth, B. (1999). A head for figures. Science, 284, 928-929.
9. Chiou, R. Y. C., Chang, E. C., Tzeng, O. J. L., & Wu, D. H. (2009). The common magnitude code underlying numerical and size processing for action but not for perception. Experimental Brain Research, 194, 553-562.
10. Corballis, M. C., & McMaster, H. (1996). The roles of stimulusresponse compatibility and mental rotation in mirror-image and left-right decisions. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 397-401.
11. Dehaene, S. (1992). Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition, 44, 1-42.
12. Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371-396.
13. Dehaene, S., Tzourio, N., Frak, F., Raynaud, L., Mehler, J., & Mazoyer, B. (1996). Cerebral activations during number multiplication and comparison: A PET study. Neuropsychologia, 34, 1097-1106.
14. Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 229-240.
15. Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2004). Contiguity and contingency in the acquisition of action effects. Psychological Research, 68, 138-154.
16. Feredoes, E. A., & Sachdev, P. S. (2006). Differential effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation of left and right posterior parietal cortex on mental rotation tasks. Cortex, 42, 750-754.
17. Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 558-565.
18. Greenwald, A. G. (1970). Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: With special reference to the ideomotor mechanism. Psychological Review, 77, 73-99.
19. Haggard, P. (2008). Human volition: Towards a neuroscience of will. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 934-946.
20. Hamilton, A. F., & Grafton, S. T. (2006). Goal representation in human anterior intraparietal sulcus. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 1133-1137.
21. Harris, I. M., Egan, G. F., Sonkkila, C., Tochon-Danguy, H. J., Paxinos, G., & Watson, J. D. G. (2000). Selective right parietal lobe activation during mental rotation. A parametric PET study. Brain, 123, 65-73.
22. Herwig, A., Prinz, W., & Waszak, F. (2007). Two modes of sensorimotor integration in intention-based and stimulusbased actions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1540-1554.
23. Hommel, B., Musseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849-878.
24. Hubbard, E. M., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Dehaene, S. (2005). Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex. Nature Review Neuroscience, 6, 435-448.
25. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 2). New York, NY: Dover.
26. Keller, P. E., & Koch, I. (2006). Exogenous and endogenous response priming with auditory stimuli. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 2, 269-276.
27. Keller, P. E., & Koch, I. (2008). Action planning in sequential skills: Relations to music performance. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 275-291.
28. Koch, I., & Kunde, W. (2002). Verbal response-effect compatibility. Memory & Cognition, 30, 1297-1303.
29. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility-a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
30. Kosslyn, S. M., DiGirolamo, G. J., Thompson, W. L., & Alpert, N. M. (1998). Mental rotation of objects versus hands: Neural mechanisms revealed by positron emission tomography. Psychophysiology, 35, 151-161.
31. Kunde, W. (2001). Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 387-394.
32. Kunde, W., Koch, I., & Hoffmann, J. (2004). Anticipated action effects affect the selection, initiation and execution of actions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 87-106.
33. Lindemann, O., Abolafia, J. M., Girardi, G., & Bekkering, H. (2007). Getting a grip on numbers: Numerical magnitude priming in object grasping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1400-1409.
34. Melcher, T., Weidema, M., Eenhuistra, R. M., Hommel, B., & Gruber, O. (2008). The neural substrate of the ideomotor principle: An event-related fMRI analysis. NeuroImage, 39, 1274-1288.
35. Michaux, N., Pesenti, M., Badets, A., Di Luca, S., & Andres, M. (2010). Let's redeploy attention to sensorimotor experience. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 283-284.
36. Mueller, V. A., Brass, M., Waszak, F., & Prinz, W. (2007). The role of the preSMA and the rostral cingulate zone in internally selected actions. NeuroImage, 37, 1354-1361.
37. Ni Choisdealbha, A., Brady, N., & Maguinness, C. (2011). Differing roles for the dominant and non-dominant hands in the hand laterality task. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 73-85.
38. Parsons, L. M. (1994). Temporal and kinematic properties of motor behavior reflected in mentally simulated action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 709-730.
39. Pesenti, M., Thioux, M., Seron, X., & De Volder, A. (2000). Neuroanatomical substrate of Arabic number processing, numerical comparison and simple addition: A PET study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 121, 461-479.
40. Pfister, R., Kiesel, A., & Melcher, T. (2010). Adaptive control of ideomotor effect anticipations. Acta Psychologica, 135, 316-322.
41. Raij, T. (1999). Patterns of brain activity during visual imagery of letters. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 282-299.
42. Schneider, W., Eschmann, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime reference guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
43. Shepard, R. N., & Cooper, L. A. (1982). Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44. Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701-703.
45. Shin, Y. K., Proctor, R. W., & Capaldi, E. J. (2010). A review of contemporary ideomotor theory. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 943-974.
46. Toussaint, L., & Meugnot, A. (2012). Short-term limb immobilization affects cognitive motor processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/a0028942
47. Walsh, V. (2003). A theory of magnitude: Common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 483-488.
48. Waszak, F., Wascher, E., Keller, P., Koch, I., Aschersleben, G., Rosenbaum, D. A., & Prinz, W. (2005). Intention-based and stimulus-based mechanisms in action selection. Experimental Brain Research, 162, 346-356.
49. Williams, J., Thomas, P. R., Maruff, P., & Wilson, P. H. (2008). The link between motor impairment level and motor imagery ability in children with developmental coordination disorder. Human Movement Science, 27, 270-285.
50. Wilson, P. H., Maruff, P., Butson, M., Williams, J., Lum, J., & Thomas, P. R. (2004). Internal representation of movement in children with developmental coordination disorder: a mental rotation task. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 46, 754-759.
51. Wraga, M., Thompson, W. L., Alpert, N. M., & Kosslyn, S. (2003). Implicit transfer of motor strategies in mental rotation. Brain and Cognition, 52, 135-143.