Academic outcomes among principal investigators, co-principal investigators, and non-PI researchers

Journal of Technology Transfer

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 111-133

  Feeney, Mary K ^a   Welch, Eric W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic outcomes; Academic productivity; Co Principal Investigators; Principal Investigators; Publications; Universities

Indexed keywords

EID: 84895057710     PISSN: 08929912     EISSN: 15737047     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10961-012-9272-9     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. The American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR) (2009). Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. 6th edition. AAPOR.
2. Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C. A., & Pugini, F. (2008). The measurement of Italian universities' research productivity by a non parametric-bibliometric methodology. Scientometrics, 76, 2.
3. August, L., & Waltman, J. (2004). Culture, climate, and contribution: Career satisfaction among female faculty. Research in Higher Education, 45(2), 177-192.
4. Bain, O., & Cummings, W. (2000). Academe's glass ceiling: Societal, professional/organizational and institutional barriers to the career advancement of academe women. Comparative Education Review, 44(4), 493-514.
5. Becker, W. E, Jr. (1975). The university professor as a utility maximizer and a producer of learning, research and income. Journal of Human Resources, 10, 107-115.
6. Behrens, Teresa R., & Gray, Denis O. (2000). Unintended consequences of cooperative research: Impact of industry sponsorship on the climate for academic freedom and other graduate student outcomes. Research Policy, 30(2), 179-199.
7. Bentley, R. J., & Blackburn, R. T. (1990). Changes in academic research performance over time: A study of institutional accumulative advantage. Research in Higher Education, 31(4), 327-353.
8. Biddle, B. J. (1986). Recent development in role theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 12, 67-92.
9. Blackburn, R. T., & Lawrence, J. H. (1996). Faculty at work. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
10. Blackburn, R. T., Behymer, C. E., & Hall, D. E. (1978). Research note: Correlates of faculty publications. Sociology of Education, 51(2).
11. Bozeman, Barry, & Corley, Elizabeth. (2004). 'Scientists' collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital'. Research Policy, 33(4), 599-616.
12. Carr, P. L., Friedman, R. H., Moskowitz, M. A., & Kazis, L. E. (1993). Comparing the status of women and men in academic medicine. Annals of Internal Medicine, 119(9), 908-913.
13. Colbeck, C. L. (1998). Merging in a seamless blend: How faculty integrate teaching and research. The Journal of Higher Education, 69(6), 647-671.
14. Cole, J. R., & Zuckerman, H. (1984). The productivity puzzle: Persistence and change in patterns of publication on men and women scientists. In P. Maehr & M. W. Steinkamp (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (pp. 217-256). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
15. Coser, L., & Coser, R. (1974). Greedy institutions. New York: Free Press.
16. Creamer, E. (1999). Knowledge production, publication productivity, and intimate academic partnerships. Journal of Higher Education, 70(May/June), 261-277.
17. Creamer, E., & McGuire, S. P. (1998). Applying the cumulative advantage perspective to scholarly writers in higher education. The Review of Higher Education, 22(1), 73-82.
18. Creswell, J. W. (1985). Faculty research performance: Lessons from the sciences and the social sciences. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4, 1985. ERIC Publications. Washington, DC: National Inst. of Education (ED).
19. Dierdorff, E. C., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Consensus in work role requirements: The influence of discrete occupational context on role expectations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1228-1241.
20. Dundar, H., & Lewis, D. R. (1998). Determinants of research productivity in higher education. Research in Higher Education, 39(6), 607-631.
21. Ekzkowitz, H., Kemelgore, C., & Uzzi, B. (2000). Athena unbound: The advancement of women in science and technology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Faia, M. A. (1980). Teaching, research and role theory. Annals of the American Academy of Political Science, 448, 36-45.
23. Fairweather, J. S. (2002). The mythologies of faculty productivity: Implications for institutional policy and decision making. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 26-48.
24. Fields, K. L., & Price, A. R. (1993). Problems in research integrity arising from misconceptions about the ownership of research. Academic Medicine, 68(9), S60-S64.
25. Fox, M. F. (1983). Publication productivity among scientists: A critical review. Social Studies of Science, 13, 285-305.
26. Fox, M. F. (1992a). Research, teaching, and publication productivity: Mutuality versus competition in academia. Sociology of Education, 65, 93-305.
27. Fox, M. F. (1992b). Research productivity and environmental context. In T. G. Whiston & R. L. Geiger (Eds.), Research and higher education. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
28. Fox, M. F. (2005). Gender, family characteristics, and publication productivity among scientists. Social Studies of Science, 35(1), 131-150.
29. Goode, W. J. (1960). A theory of role strain. American Sociological Review, 25, 483-496.
30. Hackett, E. J. (1990). Science as a vocation in the 1990s: The changing organizational culture of academic science. The Journal of Higher Education, 61(3), 241-279.
31. Hu, Q., & Gill, T. G. (2000). IS faculty research productivity: Influential factors and implications. Information Resources Management Journal, 13(2), 15-25.
32. Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673-702.
33. Long, J. S., & Fox, M. F. (1995). Scientific careers: Universalism and particularism. Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 45-71.
34. Long, J. Scott, & McGinnis, Robert. (1981). Organizational context and scientific productivity. American Sociological Review, 46(4), 422-442.
35. Marks, S. R. (1977). Multiple roles and role strain. American Sociological Review, 42, 921-936.
36. Melin, Goran. (2000). Pragmatism and self-organization: Research collaboration on the individual level. Research Policy, 29(1), 31-40.
37. Merton, R. K. (1973). Priorities in scientific discovery. In N. W. Storer (Ed.), The sociology of science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
38. Mitchell, J. E., & Rebne, D. S. (1995). The nonlinear effects of teaching and consulting on academic research productivity. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 29(1), 47-57.
39. Morahan, P. S., & Feetwood, J. (2008). The double helix of activity and scholarship: Building a medical education career with limited resources. Medical Education, 42, 34-44.
40. NSF (National Science Foundation) (2010). Proposal and award policies and procedures guide. NSF 11-1, OMB Control Number 3145-0058, http://www. nsf. gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf11001/nsf11_1. pdf. Accessed on March 31, 2011.
41. Olson, D., Maple, S. A., & Stage, F. K. (1995). Women and minority faculty job satisfaction: Professional role interests, professional satisfactions, and institutional fit. Journal of Higher Education, 66(3), 267-293.
42. Ponomariov, B., & Boardman, C. (2010). Influencing scientists' collaboration and productivity patterns through new institutions: University research centers and scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 39(5), 613-624.
43. Price, Derek. (1963). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.
44. Prpic, Katarina. (2002). Gender and productivity differentials in science. Scientometrics, 55(1), 27-58.
45. Ramsden, P. (1994). Describing and explaining research productivity. Higher Education, 28(2), 207-226.
46. Reskin, B. (1978). Scientific productivity, sex, and location in the institution of science. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 1235-1243.
47. Romainville, M. (1996). Teaching and research at university: A difficult pairing. Higher Education Management, 8, 135-144.
48. Scheid, D. C., Hamm, R. M., & Crawford, S. A. (2002). Measuring academic production. Family Medicine, 34(1), 34-44.
49. The National Science Foundation. 2009. Proposal award policies and procedures guide October 2008. NSF 09-1, OMB Control Number: 3145-0058. Part I-Proposal preparation and submission guidelines GPG at http://www. nsf. gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf09_1/gpg091print. pdf. Accessed November 11, 2011.
50. Wood, F. (1990). Factors influencing research performance of university academic staff. Higher Education, 19(1), 81-100.
51. Zuckerman, H., Cole, J., & Bruer, J. (1991). The outer circle: Women in the scientific community. New York: W. W. Norton.