Applying the cumulative advantage perspective to scholarly writers in higher education

Review of Higher Education

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 73-82

  Creamer, Elizabeth G ^a   McGuire, Sharon P ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032221740     PISSN: 01625748     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories. Bristol, PA: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
2. Bentley, R., & Blackburn, R. T. (1990). Changes in academic research performance over time: A study of institutional accumulative advantage. Research in Higher Education, 31(4), 327-45.
3. Blackburn, R. T., Behymer, C. E., & Hall, D. E. (1978). Research note: Correlates of faculty publications. Sociology of Education, 51, 132-141.
4. Blackburn, R. T., Wenzel, S., & Bieber, J. P. (1994). Minority vs. majority faculty publication performance: A research note. The Review of Higher Education, 17, 271-282.
5. Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professorate. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
6. Clark, S. M., & Corcoran, M. (1993. Perspectives on the professional socialization of women faculty: A case of accumulative disadvantage? In J. S. Glazer, E. M. Bensimon B. K. Townsend (Eds.), Women in higher education: A feminist perspective (pp. 399-414). Needham Heights, MA: ASHE Reader Series, Ginn Press. (Article originally printed in 1986)
7. Cole, J. R., & Singer, B. (1991). A theory of limited differences: Explaining the productivity puzzle in science. In H. Zuckerman, J. R. Cole & J. T. Bruer (Ed.), The outer circle: Women in the scientific community (pp. 277-310). New York: Norton.
8. Cole, J. R., & Zuckerman, H. (1984). The productivity puzzle: Persistence and change in patterns of publications of men and women scientists. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 2, 217-258.
9. Creamer, E. G. (1995).The scholarly productivity of women academics. Iniatives: Journal of the National Association of Women in Education, 57(1), 1-9.
10. Creswell, J. W. (1985). Faculty research performance: Lessons from the sciences and social sciences. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4. Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.
11. Fox, M. F. (1983) Publication productivity among scientists: A critical review. Social Studies of Science, 13, 285-305.
12. Fox, M. F. (1985). Publication, performance, and reward in science and scholarship. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, Vol. 1 (pp. 225-283). New York: Agathon Press.
13. Fox, M. F. (1992). Research, teaching, and publication productivity: Mutuality versus competition in academia. Sociology of Education, 65, 293-305.
14. Hunter, D. E. (1986). Women who write: Prolific female scholars in higher education and student affairs administration. Journal of the National Association for Women Deans, Administrators, and Counselors, 50(1), 33-39.
15. Hunter, D. E., & Kuh, G. D. (1987). The "Write wing": Characteristics of prolific contributors to the higher education literature. Journal of Higher Education, 58, 443-462.
16. Long, J. S., & Fox, M. F. (1995). Scientific careers: Universalism and particularism. Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 45-71.
17. Merton, R. (1973). The sociology of science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
18. Ramsden, P. (1994). Describing and explaining research productivity. Higher Education, 28, 207-226.
19. Ward, K. B., & Grant, L. (1996). Gender and academic publishing. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, Vol. 12 (pp. 172-212). Edison, NJ: Agathon.