Knowledge production, publication productivity, and intimate academic partnerships

Journal of Higher Education

Volumn 70, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 261-277

  Creamer, Elizabeth G ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033130697     PISSN: 00221546     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00221546.1999.11780764     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Abir-Am, P. G., & Outram, D. (Eds.). (1987). Uneasy careers and intimate lives. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
2. Astin, H. S., & Davis, D. E. (1985). Scholarly productivity across the life and career cycles: Facilitator and barriers for women. Reprinted in J. S. Glazer, E. M. Bensimon, & B. K. Townsend (Eds.) (1993), Women in higher education: A feminist perspective (pp. 415-423). Needham Heights, MA: ASHE Reader Series, Ginn Press.
3. Astin, H. S., & Milem, J. F. (1997). The status of academic couples in U.S. Institutions. In M. A. Ferber & J. W. Loeb (Eds.), Academic couples: Problems and promises (pp. 128-155). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
4. Austin, A. E, & Baldwin, R. G. (1991). Faculty collaboration: Enhancing the quality of scholarship and teaching. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 7. Washington, DC : George Washington University, School of Education and Human Services.
5. Bellas, M. L. (1997). The scholarly productivity of academic couples. In M. A. Ferber & J. W. Loeb (Eds.), Academic couples: Problems and promises (pp. 156-181). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
6. Chadwick, W., & de Courtivron, I. (Eds.). (1993). Significant others: Creativity & intimate Partnerships. London: Thames and Hudson.
7. Creamer, E. G. (1995). The scholarly productivity of female academics. Initiatives (Journal of the National Association of Women in Education), 57(1), 1-9.
8. Creamer, E. G. (1996). The perceived contribution of academic partners to women's publishing productivity. ERIC Document: HE 029 768.
9. Creamer, E. G. (1998). Assessing faculty publishing productivity: Issues of equity. ASHE/ERIC Higher Education Report Volume 26 No 2. Washington, DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.
10. Creamer, E. G., & McGuire, S. P. (1998). Applying the cumulative advantage perspective to scholarly writers in higher education. Review of Higher Education, 22(1), 73-82.
11. Ferber, M., & Huber, J. (1979, May). Husbands, wives, and careers. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 315-325.
12. Ferber, M. A., & Loeb, J. W.(Eds.). (1997). Academic couples: Problems and promises. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
13. Fox, M. F. (1983). Publication productivity among scientists: A critical review. Social Studies of Science, 13, 285-305.
14. Kirsch, G. E. (1993). Women writing the academy: Audience, authority, and transformation. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
15. Kyvik, S. (1990). Motherhood and scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 20, 149-160.
16. Long, J. S. (1990). The origins of sex differences in science. Social Forces, 68, 1297-1315.
17. Long, J. S., & Fox, M. F. (1995). Scientific careers: Universalism and particularism. Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 45-71.
18. Perry, R., & Brownley, M. W. (Eds.). (1984). Mothering the mind: Twelve studies of writers and their silent partners. New York: Holmes & Meier.
19. Rose, P. (1984). Parallel lives. New York: Vintage Books.
20. Ward, K. B., & Grant, L. (1996). Gender and academic publishing. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, (Vol. 12, pp. 172-212). Edison, NJ: Agathon.