A model-based behavior analysis approach for open-ended environments

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 272-282

  Segedy, James R ^a   Biswas, Gautam ^a   Sulcer, Brian ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive scaffolding; Model based assessment; Open ended learning environment; Performance metrics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894690495     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Azevedo, R., & Hadwin, A. (2005). Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition-Implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds. Instructional Science, 33(5-6), 367-379.
2. Azevedo, R., & Jacobson, M. J. (2008). Advances in scaffolding learning with hypertext and hypermedia: A summary and critical analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(1), 93-100.
3. Azevedo, R., Landis, R. S., Feyzi-Behnagh, R., Duffy, M., Trevors, G., Harley, J. M.,Hossain, G. (2012). The effectiveness of pedagogical agents' prompting and feedback in facilitating co-adapted learning with metatutor. In S. A. Cerri, W. J. Clancey, G. Papadourakis, & K. Panourgia (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7315, 212-221.
4. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.) (2000). How people learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
5. Brush, T., & Saye, J. (2001). The use of embedded scaffolds with hypermedia-supported student-centered learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10(4), 333-356.
6. Clarebout, G., & Elen, J. (2008). Advice on tool use in open learning environments. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 17(1), 81-97.
7. Flavell, J. H., Miller, P. H., & Miller, S. A. (2002). Cognitive development (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8. Hacker, D., & Donloskey, J. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of metacognition in education. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
9. Kinnebrew, J. S., & Biswas, G. (2012). Identifying learning behaviors by contextualizing differential sequence mining with action features and performance evolution. In K. Yacef, O. Zaïane, H. Hershkovitz, & J. Stamper (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Educational Data Mining. Retrieved from http://educationaldatamining.org/EDM2012/uploads/procs/Full_Papers/edm2012_full_9.pdf
10. Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212-218.
11. Lajoie, S. P., & Azevedo, R. (2006). Teaching and learning in technology-rich environments. In E. Anderman, P. H. Winne, P. A. Alexander, & L. Corno (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (2nd ed.) (pp. 803-821). New York, NY: Routledge.
12. Land, S. M. (2000). Cognitive requirements for learning with open-ended learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 61-78.
13. Land, S. M., & Hannafin, M. J. (1996). A conceptual framework for the development of theories-in-action with open-ended learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(3), 37-53.
14. Land, S. M., Hannafin, M. J., & Oliver, K. (2012). Student-centered learning environments: Foundations, assumptions, and design. In D. Jonassen & S. Land (Eds.), Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments (pp. 3-25). New York, NY: Routledge.
15. Leelawong, K., & Biswas, G. (2008). Designing learning by teaching agents: The Betty's Brain system. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 18(3), 181-208.
16. Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? American Psychologist, 59(1), 14-19.
17. McQuiggan, S. W., Rowe, J. P., Lee, S., & Lester, J. C. (2008). Story-based learning: The impact of narrative on learning experiences and outcomes. In B. P.Woolf, E. Aimeur, R. Nkambou, & S. Lajoie (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5091, 530-539.
18. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309-326.
19. Puntambekar, S., & Hübscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we missed? Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 1-12.
20. Sabourin, J., Shores, L. R., Mott, B. W., & Lester, J. C. (2012). Predicting student self-regulation strategies in game-based learning environments. In S. A. Cerri, W. J. Clancey, G. Papadourakis, & K. Panourgia (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7315, 141-150.
21. Schraw, G., Crippen K., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36(1-2), 111-139.
22. Segedy, J. R., Biswas, G., Blackstock, E. F., & Jenkins, A. (2013). Guided skill practice as an adaptive scaffolding strategy in open-ended learning environments. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7926, 532-541.
23. Segedy, J. R., Kinnebrew, J. S., & Biswas, G. (2011). Modeling learner's cognitive and metacognitive strategies in an open-ended learning environment. In P. Langley (Ed), Advances in Cognitive Systems: Papers from the AAAI Fall Symposium (pp. 297-304). Palo Alto, CA: AAAI Press.
24. Segedy, J. R., Kinnebrew, J. S., & Biswas, G. (2013). The effect of contextualized conversational feedback in a complex open-ended learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(1), 71-89.
25. Sengupta, P., Kinnebrew, J. S., Basu, S., Biswas, G., & Clark, D. (2013). Integrating computational thinking with K-12 science education using agent-based computation: A theoretical framework. Educational and Information Technologies, 18(2), 351-380.
26. van Joolingen, W. R., de Jong, T., Lazonder, A. W., Savelsbergh, E. R., & Manlove, S. (2005). Co-Lab: Research and development of an online learning environment for collaborative scientific discovery learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(4), 671-688.
27. Winne, P. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed.) (pp. 153-189). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (Eds.). (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. J. (Eds.). (2012). Metacognition in science education: Trends in current research. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.