Can parafoveal-on-foveal effects be obtained when reading an unspaced alphasyllabic script (Thai)?

Writing Systems Research

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 94-104

  Winskel, Heather ^a   Perea, Manuel ^b  

^a SOUTHERN CROSS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Eye movements; Parafoveal on foveal effects; Reading; Thai; Unspaced script; Word frequency

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894564241     PISSN: 17586801     EISSN: 1758681X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17586801.2013.843440     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bai, X., Hu, X., & Yan, G. (S). Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in Chinese reading: The influence of semantic transparencies of word n on word na1 processing. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 41, 377-386. doi:10.3 724/SP. J.1041.2009.00377
2. Calvo, M. G., & Meseguer, E. (2002). Eye movements and processing stages in reading: Relative contribution of visual, lexical, and contextual factors. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 5, 66-77
3. Chance, K. H., Rayner, K., & Well, A. D. (2005). Eye movements and phonological parafoveal preview: Effects of reading skill. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 209-217. d oi:10.1037/h0087476
4. Cui, L., Wang, S-P., Yan, G-L., & Bai, X-J. (2010). Parafoveal-on-foveal interactions in normal Chinese reading. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 42, 547-558. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2010.00547
5. Drieghe, D. (2011). Parafoveal-on-foveal effects on eye movements during reading. In S. Liversedge, I. Gilchrist, & S. Everling (Eds.), Oxford handbook on eye movements (pp. 839-855). Oxford: Oxford University Press
6. Drieghe, D., Brysbaert, M., Desmet, T., & De Baecke, C. (2004). Word skipping in reading: On the interplay of linguistic and visual factors. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1 -2), 79-103. doi:10.1080/ 09541440340000141
7. Engbert, R., Longtin, A., & Kliegl, R. (2002). A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing. Vision R esearch, 42, 621-636. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00301-7
8. Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E. M., & Kliegl, R. (2005). SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychologi cal Review, 112, 777-813. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.777 EyeLink II [Apparatus]. (aaaa). http://www.sr-research.com/eyelinkII.html
9. Frost, R. (2012). Towards a universal model of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 263-279. doi:10.1017/S0140525X11001841
10. Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1993). Eye movement control during reading: Fixation measures reflect foveal but not parafoveal processing difficulty. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 201-221. doi:10.1037/h0078814
11. Hy?n?, J., & Bertram, R. (2004). Do frequency characteristics of nonfixated words influence the processing of fixated words du ring readinga European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1-2), 104-127
12. Hy?n?, J., Bertram, R., & Pollatsek, A. (2004). Are long compound words identified serially via their constituentsa Eviden ce from an eye-movement contingent display change study. Memory & Cognition, 32, 523-532. doi:10.3758/BF03195844
13. Inhoff, A. W. (1989). Parafoveal processing of words and saccade computation during eye fixa tions in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 544-555. doi:10.1037/0096- 1523.15.3.544
14. Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K. (1986). Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading. Effects of word frequency. Perception and Psychophysics, 40, 431-439. doi:10.3758/BF03208203
15. Juhasz, B. J., Pollatsek, A., Hy?n? , J., Drieghe, D., & Rayner, K. (2009). Parafoveal processing within and between words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1356-1376. doi:10.1080/17470210802400010
16. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1987). The psychology of reading and language comprehension. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon
17. Kambe, G. (2004). Parafoveal processing of prefixed words during eye fixations in reading: Evidence against morphological influences on parafoveal preprocessing. Perception and Psychophysics, 66, 279-292. doi:10.3758/BF03194879
18. Kennedy, A. (1998). The influence of parafoveal wo rds on foveal inspection time: Evidence for a processing trade off. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 149-179). Oxford: Elsevier
19. Kennedy, A. (2000). Parafoveal processing in wo rd recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 53, 429-455. doi:10.1080/713755901
20. Kennedy, A., & Pynte, J. (2005). Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal r eading. Vision Research, 45(2), 153-168. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2004.07. 037
21. Kennedy, A., Pynte, J., & Ducrot, S. (2002). Parafoveal-on-foveal interactions in word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 55, 1307-1337. doi:10.1080/02724980244000071
22. Kennison, S. M., & Clifton Jnr, C. (1995). Determinants of parafoveal preview benefit in hig h and low working memory capacity readers: Implications for eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(1), 68-81. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.1.68
23. Kliegl, R., Nuthmann, A., & Engbert, R. (2006). Tracking the mind during reading: The influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(1), 12-35. doi:10.1037 /0096-3445.135.1.12
24. Luksaneeyanawin, S. (2004). Thai word frequency based on two million word corpus of written genre texts. Bangkok, Thailand: Center for Research in Speech and Language Processing. Faculty of Arts. Chulalongkorn University
25. Masson, M. E. J. (2011). A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 679-690. doi:10.3758/s13428-010-0049-5
26. Perea, M., & Acha, J. (2009). Space information is important for reading. Vision Research, 49, 1994-2000. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2009.05.009
27. Pynte, J., & Kennedy, A. (2006). An influence over eye movements in reading exerted from beyond the level of the word: Evidence from reading English and French. Vision Research, 46, 3786-3801. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2006.07.004
28. Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111-196. doi:10.2307/271063
29. Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in rea ding. Cognitive Psychology, 7(1), 65-81. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(75)90005-5
30. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 12 4, 372-422. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
31. Rayner, K., Fischer, M. H., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). Unspaced text interferes with both word identification and eye movement control. Vision Research, 38, 1129-1144. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00274-5
32. Rayner, K., Inhoff, A. W., Morrison, R. E., Slowiaczek, M. L., & Bertera, J. H. (1981). Masking of foveal and parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 167-179. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.7.1.167
33. Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K. (1998). T oward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105(1), 125-157. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.105.1.125
34. Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2003). The E-Z reader mode l of eye movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 26, 445-526. doi:10.1017/S0140525X03000104
35. Schroyens, W., Vitu, F., Brysbaert, M., & d'Ydewalle, G. (1999). Eye movement control during reading: Foveal load and parafoveal processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 52, 1021-1046. doi:10.1080/713755859
36. Wagenmakers, E.-J (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 779-804. doi:10.3758/BF03194105
37. White, S. J. (2008). Eye movement control during reading: Ef fects of word frequency and orthographic familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 205-223. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.205
38. White, S. J., & Liversedge, S. P. (2004). Orthographic familiarity influences initial eye fixation positions in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1- 2), 52-78. doi:10.1080/09541440340000204
39. White, S. J., Rayner K., & Liversedge, S. P. (2005). Eye movements and the modulation of parafoveal processing by foveal processing difficulty: A re-examination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 891-896. doi:10.3758/BF03196782
40. Winskel, H., & Iemwanthong, K. (2010). Reading and spelling acquisition in Thai children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 23, 1021-1053. doi:10.1007/s11145-009-9194-6
41. Winskel, H., Perea, M., & Ratitamkul, T. (2012). On the flexibility of letter position coding during lexical processing: Evidence from eye movements when reading Thai. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 1522-1536. doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.658409
42. Wotschack, C., & Kliegl, R. (2013). Reading strategy modulates parafoveal-on-foveal effects in sentence reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 548-562. doi:10.1080/17470218.2011.625094
43. Yan, M., Zhou, W., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R. (2012). Lexical and sub-lexical semantic preview benefits in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 38, 1069-1075. doi:10.1037/a0026935