Reading strategy modulates parafoveal-on-foveal effects in sentence reading

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 66, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 548-562

  Wotschack, Christiane ^a   Kliegl, Reinhold ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Distributed processing; Eye movements in reading; Fixational selectivity; Parafoveal on foveal effects; Reading strategy

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; READING; RETINA FOVEA; SEMANTICS; STATISTICAL MODEL; VERY ELDERLY; VISUAL FIELD; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATTENTION; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; FOVEA CENTRALIS; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS; VISUAL FIELDS; VOCABULARY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84875312184     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2011.625094     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bates, D. M. and Maechler, M. 2009. Lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. (R package Version 0.9993765-32) [Software]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
2. Buswell, G. T. 1922. Fundamental reading habits: A study of their development, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
3. Drieghe, D., Desmet, T. and Brysbaert, M. 2007. How important are linguistic factors in word skipping during reading?. British Journal of Psychology, 98(1): 157-171. (doi:10.1348/000712606X111258)
4. Drieghe, D., Pollatsek, A., Staub, A. and Rayner, K. 2008. The word grouping hypothesis and eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 34(6): 1552-1560. (doi:10.1037/a0013017)
5. Drieghe, D., Rayner, K. and Pollatsek, A. 2008. Mislocated fixations can account for parafoveal-on-foveal effects in eye movements during reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(8): 1239-1249. (doi:10.1080/17470210701467953)
6. Engbert, R. and Kliegl, R. 2003. Microsaccades uncover the orientation of covert attention. Vision Research, 43(9): 1035-1045. (doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00084-1)
7. Engbert, R. and Mergenthaler, K. 2006. Microsaccades are triggered by low retinal image slip. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103: 7192-7197. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0509557103)
8. Geyken, A. 2007. "The DWDS Corpus: A reference corpus for the German language of the 20th century". In Idioms and collocations: From corpus to electronic lexical resource, Edited by: Fellbaum, In C. 23-40. Birmingham, UK: Continuum Press.
9. Heister, J., Würzner, K. M., Bubenzer, J., Pohl, E., Hanneforth, T.Geyken, A. 2011. dlexDB-Eine lexikalische Datenbank für die psychologische und linguistische Forschung [dlexDB-a lexical database for psychological and linguistic research]. Psychologische Rundschau, 62(1): 10-20. (doi:10.1026/0033-3042/a000029)
10. Heller, D. 1985. "Eye movements in reading". In Cognition and eye movements, Edited by: Groner, In R. and Fraisse, P. 23-40. Birmingham, UK: Continuum Press.
11. Henderson, J. M. and Ferreira, F. 1990. Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16(3): 417-429. (doi:10.1037/0278-7393.16.3.417)
12. Henderson, J. M. and Ferreira, F. 1993. Eye movement control during reading: Fixation measures reflect foveal but not parafoveal processing difficulty. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47(2): 201-221. (doi:10.1037/h0078814)
13. Huey, E. B. 1908. The psychology and pedagogy of reading, New York, NY: Macmillan.
14. Just, M. A. and Carpenter, P. A. 1980. A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87: 329-354. (doi:10.1037/0033-295X.87.4.329)
15. Kennedy, A. 2000. Parafoveal processing in word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 53(2): 429-455.
16. Kennedy, A. 2008. Parafoveal-on-foveal effects are not an artifact of mis-located saccades. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 2(1): 1-10.
17. Kennedy, A. and Pynte, J. 2005. Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading. Vision Research, 45(2): 153-168. (doi:10.1016/j.visres.2004.07.037)
18. Kennedy, A., Pynte, J. and Ducrot, S. 2002. Parafoveal-on-foveal interactions in word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 55(4): 1307-1337.
19. Kliegl, R. 2007. Toward a perceptual-span theory of distributed processing in reading: A reply to Rayner, Pollatsek, Drieghe, Slattery, and Reichle (2007). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(3): 530-537. (doi:10.1037/0096-3445.136.3.530)
20. Kliegl, R., Grabner, E., Rolfs, M. and Engbert, R. 2004. Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16: 262-284. (doi:10.1080/09541440340000213)
21. Kliegl, R., Nuthmann, A. and Engbert, R. 2006. Tracking the mind during reading: The influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(1): 12-35. (doi:10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.12)
22. Laubrock, J., Kliegl, R. and Engbert, R. 2006. SWIFT explorations of age differences in eye movements during reading. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(6): 872-884. (doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.06.013)
23. Lehrl, S. 1977. Mehrfach-Wortschatz-Test Form B [Mulitiple Choice Vocabulary Test Form B], Erlangen, Germany: Perimed.
24. McConkie, G. W. and Rayner, K. 1975. The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 17: 578-586. (doi:10.3758/BF03203972)
25. Miellet, S., O'Donnell, P. J. and Sereno, S. C. 2009. Parafoveal magnification: Visual acuity does not modulate the perceptual span in reading. Psychological Science, 20(6): 721-728. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02364.x)
26. O'Regan, J. K. and Levy-Schoen, A. 1987. "Eye movement strategy and tactics in word recognition and reading". In Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading, Edited by: Coltheart, In M. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Pinheiro, J. and Bates, D. 2000. Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS, New York, NY: Springer.
28. R Development Core Team. 2009. "R: A language and environment for statistical computing (version 2.9.0). [Software]". Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
29. Radach, R., Huestegge, L. and Reilly, R. 2008. The role of global top-down factors in local eye-movement control in reading. Psychological Research, 72(6): 675-688. (doi:10.1007/s00426-008-0173-3)
30. Radach, R. and Kennedy, A. 2004. Theoretical perspectives on eye movements in reading: Past controversies, current issues, and an agenda for future research. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1-2): 3-26. (doi:10.1080/09541440340000295)
31. Rayner, K. 1975. The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7: 65-81. (doi:10.1016/0010-0285(75)90005-5)
32. Rayner, K. 1998. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3): 372-422. (doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372)
33. Rayner, K. and Duffy, S. A. 1986. Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition, 14: 191-201. (doi:10.3758/BF03197692)
34. Rayner, K. and Fischer, M. H. 1996. Mindless reading revisited: Eye movements during reading and scanning are different. Perception & Psychophysics, 58(5): 734-747. (doi:10.3758/BF03213106)
35. Rayner, K. and Pollatsek, A. 1987. "Eye movements in reading: A tutorial review". In Attention and Performance XII, Edited by: Coltheart, M. 327-362. London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
36. Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Drieghe, D., Slattery, T. J. and Reichle, E. D. 2007. Tracking the mind during reading via eye movements: Comments on Kliegl, Nuthmann, and Engbert (2006). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(3): 520-529. discussion, 530-527 (doi:10.1037/0096-3445.136.3.520)
37. Rayner, K., Reichle, E. D., Stroud, M. J., Williams, C. C. and Pollatsek, A. 2006. The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and older readers. Psychology and Aging, 21(3): 448-465. (doi:10.1037/0882-7974.21.3.448)
38. Reichle, E. D., Liversedge, S. P., Pollatsek, A. and Rayner, K. 2009. Encoding multiple words simultaneously in reading is implausible. Trends in Cognitive Science, 13(3): 115-119. (doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.12.002)
39. Risse, S. and Kliegl, R. 2011. Adult age differences in the perceptual span during reading. Psychology and Aging, 26(2): 451-460. (doi:10.1037/a0021616)
40. Schad, D., Nuthmann, A. and Engbert, R. 2010. Eye movements during reading of randomly shuffled text. Vision Research, 50: 2600-2616. (doi:10.1016/j.visres.2010.08.005)
41. Tinker, M. A. 1958. Recent studies of eye movements in reading. Psychological Bulletin, 55(4): 215-231. (doi:10.1037/h0041228)
42. Wechsler, D. 1964. Der Hamburg-Wechsler-Intelligenztest für Erwachsene (HAWIE) [Hamburg Wechsler intelligence test for adults], Berlin, Germany: Huber.
43. Wotschack, C. 2009. Eye movements in reading strategies: How reading strategies modulate effects of distributed processing and oculomotor control, Potsdam, Germany: Universitätsverlag.