Activity Theory and Qualitative Research in Digital Domains

Theory into Practice

Volumn 51, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 83-90

  Sam, Cecile ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859640881     PISSN: 00405841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00405841.2012.662856     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bannon, L. J. and Kaptelinin, V. 2001. "From human-computer interaction to computer activity.". In User interfaces for all Edited by: Stephandis, C. 183-202. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Baym, N. 1997. "Interpreting soap operas and creating community: Inside an electronic fan culture.". In Culture of the Internet Edited by: Keisler, S. 103-120. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Bertelsen, O. W. and Bodker, S. 2003. "AT.". In HCI models theories, and frameworks: Toward a multidisciplinary science Edited by: Carroll, J. M. 291-324. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
4. Bjorke, A. 2004. "The concepts of communities of practice, AT and implication for distributed learning.". In Artikler om høgskolepedagogikk Edited by: Næss, G., Ask, B., Horn, G. and Lager, R. 24-36. Agder, Norway: Agder University College.
5. Brown, J. S. 2002. Growing up digital: How the Web changes work, education, and the way people learn. United States Distance Learning Journal, 16: 5-13.
6. Burnett, G., Kazmer, M., Dickey, M. and Chudoba, K. 2003. Inscription and interpretation of text: A cultural hermeneutic examination of virtual community. Information Research, 9: 162-174.
7. Creswell, J. W. 2007. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Ellis, D., Oldridge, R. and Vasconcelos, A. 2004. Community and virtual community. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 38: 145-186.
9. Engestrom, Y. 1999. "Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice.". In Perspectives on activity theory Edited by: Engestrom, Y., Miettinen, R. and Punamaki, R. 377-404. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
10. Haythornthwaite, C., Kazmer, M., Robins, J. and Shoemaker, S. 2000. Community development among distance learners: Temporal and technological dimensions. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 6 Retrieved fromhttp://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue1/haythornthwaite.html
11. Hine, C. 2000. Virtual ethnography Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Jonassen, D. H. and Rohrer-Murphy, L. 1999. AT as a framework for designing constructivist learning environment. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 14: 61-79.
13. Kaplan, A. M. and Haenlein, M. 2011. The early bird catches the news: Nine things you should know about micro-blogging. Business Horizons, 54: 105-113.
14. Kuutti, K. 1991. "AT and its applications to information systems research and development.". In Information systems research: Contemporary approaches and emergent traditions Edited by: Nissen, H. E., Klein, H. K. and Hirscheim, R. 529-549. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
15. Kuutti, K. 1996. "AT as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research.". In Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction Edited by: Nardi, B. A. 17-44. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Mann, C. and Stewart, F. 2000. Internet communication and qualitative research Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. McLuhan, M. 1964. Understanding media: The extensions of man (Critical Ed.) Berkeley, CA: Ginko Press.
18. Nardi, B. A. 1996. "Studying context: A comparison of AT, situated action models, and distributed cognition.". In Context and consciousness: AT and human-computer interaction Edited by: Nardi, B. A. 7-16. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. O'Toole, P. and Were, P. 2008. Observing places, using space and material culture in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 8: 616-634.
20. Prensky, M. 2001. Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9: 1-6.
21. Rheingold, H. 1993. The virtual community: Homesteading the electronic frontier. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Rheingold, H. 2002. Smart mobs: The next social revolution. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.
23. Rice, K. L. 2006. A comprehensive look at distance education in the K-12 context. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38: 425-448.
24. Roth, M. and Lee, Y. 2007. "Vygotsky's neglected legacy": Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 77: 186-232.
25. Sieckenius de Souza, C. and Preece, J. 2004. A framework for analyzing and understanding online communities. Interacting With Computers, 16: 579-610.
26. Song, F. W. 2009. Virtual communities: Bowling alone, online together. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
27. Wellman, B. 2001. Physical place and cyber place: The rise of networked individualism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25: 227-252.
28. Wellman, B., Boase, J. and Chen, W. 2002. The networked nature of community: Online and offline. IT & Society, 1: 151-165.
29. Wertsch, J. V. 1998. Mind as action New York: Oxford University Press.
30. Wertsch, J. V. 2002. Computer mediation, PBL, and dialogicality. Distance Education, 23: 105-108.