Computer-based teaching module design: Principles derived from learning theories

Medical Education

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 247-254

  Lau, K H Vincent ^a  

^a YALE NEW HAVEN HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EDUCATIONAL MODEL; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; HUMAN; LEARNING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; METHODOLOGY; MULTIMEDIA; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; REVIEW; TEACHING;

COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; HUMANS; LEARNING; MODELS, EDUCATIONAL; MULTIMEDIA; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; SOFTWARE DESIGN; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84894030144     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: 13652923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/medu.12357     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Williams C, Aubin S, Harkin P, Cottrell D. A randomised, controlled, single-blind trial of teaching provided by a computer-based multimedia package versus lecture. Med Educ 2001;35:847-54.
2. Jenkins S, Goel R, Morrell D. Computer-assisted instruction versus traditional lecture for medical student teaching of dermatology morphology: a randomised control trial. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008;59:255-9.
3. Schultze-Mosgau S, Zielinski T, Lochner J. Interactive, web-based e-lectures with a multimedia online examination. Med Educ 2004;38:1184.
4. Glicksman J, Brandt M, Moukarbel R, Rotenberg B, Fung K. Computer-assisted teaching of epistaxis management: a randomised controlled trial. Laryngoscope 2009;119:466-72.
5. Davis J, Crabb S, Rogers E, Zamora J, Khan K. Computer-based teaching is as good as face-to-face lecture-based teaching of evidence-based medicine: a randomised controlled trial. Med Teach 2008;30:302-7.
6. McDonough M, Marks IM. Teaching medical students exposure therapy for phobia/panic - randomised, controlled comparison of face-to-face tutorial in small groups vs. solo computer instruction. Med Educ 2002;36:412-7.
7. Miedzybrodzka Z, Hamilton NM, Gregory H, Milner B, Frade I, Sinclair T, Mollison J, Haites N. Teaching undergraduates about familial breast cancer: comparison of a computer-assisted learning (CAL) package with a traditional tutorial approach. Eur J Hum Genet 2001;9:953-6.
8. Issa N, Schuller M, Santacaterina S, Shapiro M, Wang E, Mayer RE, DaRosa DA. Applying multimedia design principles enhances learning in medical education. Med Educ 2011;45:818-26.
9. Garde S, Heid J, Haag M, Bauch M, Weires T, Leven F. Can design principles of traditional learning theories be fulfilled by computer-based training systems in medicine: the example of CAMPUS. Int J Med Inform 2007;76:124-9.
10. Cook D, Dupras D. A practical guide to developing effective web-based learning. J Gen Intern Med 2004;19: 698-707.
11. Moreno R, Mayer R. Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: the role of modality and contiguity. J Educ Psychol 1999;91:358-68.
12. Mayer R. Applying the science of learning to medical education. Med Educ 2010;44:543-9.
13. Nagowah L, Nagowah S. A reflection on the dominant learning theories: behaviourism, cognitivism and constructivism. Int J Learn 2009;16:279-86.
14. Olson J. Constructivism and education: a productive alliance. Interchange 1982;13:70-5.
15. Jones V. Humanistic behaviourism: a tool for creating healthy learning environments. J School Psychol 1977;15:320-8.
16. Cooper G. Cognitive load theory as an aid for instructional design. Australas J Educ Technol 1990;6:108-13.
17. Sweller J. Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learn Instr 1994;4:295-312.
18. Collins J. Education techniques for lifelong learning: making a PowerPoint presentation. Radiographics 2004;24:1177-83.
19. Reigeluth C. Elaborating the elaboration theory. Educ Tech Res Dev 1992;40:80-6.
20. Wilson B, Cole P. A critical review of elaboration theory. Educ Tech Res Dev 1992;40:63-79.
21. Sun L, Li F. Online instructional design based on meaningful discovery learning theory. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Education Technology and Computers, 22-24 June 2010, Shanghai, China; 237-239.
22. Xu W, Zhang J. Functional design of the virtual learning community based on the connectivism learning theory. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, 16-18 Sept 2011, Yichang, China; 6599-602.
23. Cook D. Learning and cognitive styles in web-based learning: theory, evidence, and application. Acad Med 2005;80:266-78.
24. Cook DA, Gelula MH, Dupras DM, Schwartz A. Instructional methods and cognitive and learning styles in web-based learning: report of two randomised trials. Med Educ 2007;41:897-905.
25. Cook D. Revisiting cognitive and learning styles in computer-assisted instruction: not so useful after all. Acad Med 2012;87:778-84.
26. Yelland N, Masters J. Rethinking scaffolding in the information age. Comput Educ 2007;48:362-82.
27. Green M, Ellis P. Impact of an evidence-based medicine curriculum based on adult learning theory. J Gen Intern Med 1997;12:742-50.
28. Roman B, Kay J. Fostering curiosity: using the educator-learner relationship to promote a facilitative learning environment. Psychiatry 2007;70:205-8.
29. Roman B. Curiosity: a best practice in education. Med Educ 2011;45:654-6.
30. Felder R, Silverman L. Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Eng Educ 1988;78:674-81.
31. Khalil M, Paas F, Johnson T, Payer A. Design of interactive and dynamic anatomical visualisations: the implication of cognitive load theory. Anat Rec B New Anat 2005;286:15-20.
32. Cheuh H, Barnett G. 'Just-in-time' clinical information. Acad Med 1997;72:512-7.
33. Dempster F. Spacing effects and their implications for theory and practice. Educ Psychol Rev 1989;1:309-30.
34. Gunderman R, McCammack K IV. PowerPoint: know your medium. J Am Coll Radiol 2010;7:711-4.
35. James C, Linte C. Tips on effective presentation design and delivery. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 31 August-4 September 2010, Buenos Aires, Argentina; 1108.
36. Lim F. Wake up to better PowerPoint presentations. Nursing 2012;42:46-8.
37. Lahaie U. Web-based instruction: getting faculty onboard. J Prof Nurs 2007;23:335-42.