Teaching style, ICT experience and teachers' attitudes toward teaching with Web 2.0

Education and Information Technologies

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 41-60

  Kale, Ugur ^a   Goh, Debbie ^b  

^a WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Information communication technologies; Internet; Teacher attitudes; Teacher professional development; Teaching style; Web 2.0

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893724268     PISSN: 13602357     EISSN: 15737608     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10639-012-9210-3     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Albion, P. R. (2008). Web 2. 0 in teacher education: Two imperatives for action. Computers in the Schools, 25(3/4), 181-198.
2. Allen, D. (1998). Assessing student learning: From grading to understanding. New York: Teachers College Press.
3. Appalachian Regional Commission (2006). Program and Impact Summary: Telecommunications and Technology in Appalachia. Retrieved June 25, 2012, from http://www. arc. gov/program_areas/ProgramandImpactSummaryTelecommunicationsandTechnologyinAppalachia. asp.
4. Athina, M., & George, H. (2005). Pedagogical obstacles in teacher training in information and communication technology. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 14(2), 241-254.
5. Banyard, P., Underwoord, J., & Twinner, A. (2006). Do enhanced communication technologies inhibit or facilitate self-regulated learning? European Journal of Education, 41(3/4), 473-489.
6. Barab, S., & Dede, C. (2007). Games and immersive participatory simulations for science education: An emerging type of curricula. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(1), 1-3.
7. Becker, H. J. (1999). Internet use by teachers: Conditions of professional use and teacher-centered student use. Irvine: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations. Retrieved December 11, 2011, from http://www. crito. uci. edu/tlc/findings/internet-use/text-tables. pdf.
8. Behar-Horenstein, L. S., Mitchell, G. S., Notzer, N., Penfield, R., & Eli, I. (2006). Teaching style beliefs among U. S. and Israeli faculty. Journal of Dental Education, 70(8), 851-856.
9. Brush, T., & Saye, J. (2007, April). Evaluation of the persistent issues in history laboratory for virtual field experience (PIH-LVFE). Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Instructional Technology Special Interest Group, Chicago, IL.
10. Calibrate (2008). Calibrating elearning in schools. Retrieved August 10, 2009, from http://calibrate. eun. org/shared/data/calibrate/deliverables/CALIBRATEFinalReport. pdf.
11. Cavas, B., Cavas, P., Karaoglan, B., & Kisla, T. (2009). A Study on science teachers' attitudes toward information and communication technologies in education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(2), 20-32.
12. Chaney-Cullen, T., & Duffy, T. (1998). Strategic teaching frameworks: Multimedia to support teacher change. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 1-40.
13. Crook, C., & Harrison, C. (2008). Web 2. 0 technologies for learning at key stages 3 and 4: Summary report, Becta. Retrieved September 2, 2011, from http://dera. ioe. ac. uk/1478/.
14. Dawson, V. (2008). Use of information communication technology by early career science teachers in Western Australia. International Journal of Science Education, 30(2), 203-219.
15. den Brok, P., Bergen, T., Stahl, R. J., & Brekelmans, M. (2004). Students' perceptions of teacher control behaviors. Learning and Instruction, 14(4), 425-443.
16. Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284.
17. Grasha, A. F. (1994). A matter of style: The teacher as expert, formal authority, personal model, facilitator, and delegator. College Teaching, 42(4), 12.
18. Goos, M., Dole, S., & Geiger, V. (2011). Improving numeracy education in rural schools: A Professional development approach. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 23(2), 129-148.
19. Harvey-Buschel, P. (2009). A quantitative examination of factors that impact technology integration in urban public secondary mathematics classrooms. Ed. D. dissertation, Bowie State University, United States - Maryland. Retrieved May 18, 2012, from Dissertations & Theses: Full Text. (Publication No. AAT 3365812).
20. Hernandez-Encuentra, E., Pousada, M., & Gomez-Zuniga, B. (2009). ICT and older people: Beyond usability. Educational Gerontology, 35(3), 226-245.
21. Inan, F. A., Lowther, D. L., Ross, S. M., & Strahl, D. (2010). Pattern of classroom activities during students' use of computers: Relations between instructional strategies and computer applications. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 26(3), 540-546.
22. Interactive Educational Systems Design. (2009). Safe schools in a web 2. 0 world initiative national online survey of district technology directors exploring district use of web 2. 0 technologies (p. 73). New York: IESD.
23. Jenkins, H. (2006, November 6). Eight Traits of the New Media Landscape. Confessions of an Aca-Fan: The Official Weblog of Henry Jenkins. Retrieved November 6, 2009, from http://www. henryjenkins. org/2006/11/eight_traits_of_the_new_media. html.
24. Kozma, R. B., & Anderson, R. E. (2002). Qualitative case studies of innovative pedagogical practices using ICT. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(4), 387-394.
25. Kramer, B., Walker, A., & Brill, J. (2007). The underutilization of information and communication technology-assisted collaborative project-based learning among international educators: A Delphi study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(5), 527-543.
26. Kuskaya-Mumcu, F., & Kocak-Usluel, Y. (2010). ICT in vocational and technical schools: Teachers' instructional, managerial and personal use matters. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 9(1), 98-106.
27. Latio, G. (2010). Examination of factors that influence computer technology use for classroom instruction by teachers in Ohio public high schools. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A, 70, Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
28. Lee, M., & Tsai, C. (2010). Exploring teachers' perceived self-efficacy and technological pedagogical content knowledge with respect to educational use of the world wide web. Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 38(1), 1-21.
29. Light, D. (2011). Do web 2. 0 right. Learning & Leading with Technology, 38(5), 10-12.
30. Light, D., & Polin, D. K. (2010). Integrating web 2. 0 tools into the classroom: Changing the culture of learning. New York: EDC/Center for Children and Technology.
31. Lyons, T. (2007). The Professional development, resource and support needs of rural and urban ICT teachers. Australian Educational Computing, 22(2), 22-31.
32. Lyons, T., Cooksey, R., Panizzon, D., Parnell, A., & Pegg, J. (2006). Science, ICT and mathematics education in rural and regional Australia: The SiMERR national survey (Abridged report). Retrieved April 28, 2012, from http://www. une. edu. au/simerr/pages/projects/1nationalsurvey/Abridged%20report/AbridgedFull. pdf.
33. Mayrath, M. C., Traphagan, T., Jarmon, L., Trivedi, A., & Resta, P. (2010). Teaching with virtual worlds: Factors to consider for instructional use of second life. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43(4), 403-444.
34. Miller, P. (2011). Broadband access lacking in West Virginia. Retrieved May 23, 2012, from www. wvpolicy. org/downloads/Broadband102411. pdf.
35. Moylan, W. A. (2008). Learning by project: Developing essential 21st century skills using student team projects. International Journal of Learning, 15(9), 287-292.
36. Mumtaz, S. (2000). Factors affecting teachers' use of information and communications technology: A review of the literature. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9(3), 319-342.
37. National Center for Children in Poverty (2010). West Virginia: Demographics of low-Income children. Retrieved, July 25, 2012, from http://nccp. org/profiles/WV_profile_6. html.
38. National Center for Children in Poverty (2010). West Virginia: Demographics of poor children. Retrieved, July 24, 2012, from http://nccp. org/profiles/WV_profile_7. html.
39. Norton, P., & Hathaway, D. (2008). On its way to k-12 classrooms, web 2. 0 goes to graduate school. Computers in the Schools, 25(3/4), 163-180.
40. Pan, S. (2011). The relationship between teachers' self-efficacy and the integration of Web 2. 0 tools in k-12. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A, 71, Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
41. Park, S. H., & Ertmer, P. A. (2008). Impact of problem-based learning (PBL) on teachers' beliefs regarding technology use. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(2), 247-267.
42. st Century Skills. (2004). 21st century learning environments white paper. Retrieved July 1, 2009, from http://www. 21stcenturyskills. org/documents/le_white_paper-1. pdf.
43. Pew Internet & American Life Project. (2007). A Typology of information and communication technology users. Retrieved September 13, 2009, from http://www. pewinternet. org/~/media//Files/Reports/2007/PIP_ICT_Typology. pdf. pdf.
44. Polly, D., & Hannafin, M. J. (2010). Reexamining technology's role in learner-centered professional development. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(5), 557-571.
45. Robinson, L. K., Brown, A., & Green, T. (2007). The threat of security: Hindering technology integration in the classroom. Learning and Leading with Technology, 35(2), 18-23.
46. Rosen, D., & Nelson, C. (2008). Web 2. 0: A new generation of learners and education. Computers in the Schools, 25(3/4), 211-225.
47. Rosenfeld, B., & Martinez-Pons, M. (2005). Promoting classroom technology use. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6(2), 145-153.
48. Selwood, I., & Pilkington, R. (2005). Teacher workload: using ICT to release time to teach. Educational Review, 57(2), 163-174.
49. Sherin, M. G., & Han, S. Y. (2004). Teacher learning in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 163-183.
50. Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers' professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 20-37.
51. Solomon, G., & Schrum, L. (2007). Web 2. 0: New tools, new schools. Eugene: International Society for Technology in Education.
52. Tondeur, J., Devos, G., van Houtte, M., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2009). Understanding structural and cultural school characteristics in relation to educational change: The case of ICT integration. Educational Studies, 35(2), 223-235.
53. Trinidad, S., & Broadley, T. (2008). Using Web2. 0 Applications to Close the Digital Divide in Western Australia. Education in Rural Australia, 18(1), 3-11.
54. Trucano, M. (2005). Knowledge Maps: ICTs in Education. Washington: infoDev / World Bank.
55. U. S. Census Bureau (2010). State median income. Retrieved, July13, 2012, from http://www. census. gov/hhes/www/income/statemedfaminc. html.
56. stcentury learning preview. Retrieved August 28, 2011, from http://www. vzwbusinesstools. com/mobilelearning/.
57. Webb, M., & Cox, M. (2004). A Review of pedagogy related to information and communications technology. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(3), 235-286.
58. West Virginia Department of Education (2009-2010). Closing the achievement gap report for 21st century learners in West Virginia. Retrieved, July 26, 2012, from http://wvde. state. wv. us/data/cag2009. pdf.
59. West Virginia Department of Education (n. d. a). Division of curriculum and instruction. Retrieved August 28, 2011, from http://wvde. state. wv. us/dci/.
60. West Virginia Department of Education (n. d. b). Global21: Professional development. Retrieved August 27, 2011, from http://wvde. state. wv. us/global21/professional-development. html.
61. West Virginia State Educational Technology Plan (2010). Retrieved, July 25, 2012, from http://wvde. state. wv. us/technology/techplan/documents/WVStateEducationalTechnologyPlanRevisedJan2009. pdf.
62. Williams, D., Coles, L., Wilson, K., Richardson, A., & Tuson, J. (2000). Teachers and ICT: current use and future needs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(4), 307.
63. Wilson, J., & Ringstaff, C. (2010). Going the distance for rural science teachers: California consortium develops strategies to provide science content professional development for isolated teachers. Journal of Staff Development, 31(5), 44-47.
64. Zakopoulos, V. (2005). An evaluation of the quality of ICT teaching within an ICT-rich environment: The case of two primary schools. Education and Information Technologies, 10(4), 323-340.