Correction to Unfalsifiability and mutual translatability of major modeling schemes for choice reaction time (Psychological Review, (2013)) DOI:10.1037/a0034190;Unfalsifiability and mutual translatability of major modeling schemes for choice reaction time

Psychological Review

Volumn 121, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 1-32

  Jones, Matt ^a   Dzhafarov, Ehtibar N ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Choice reaction time; Diffusion model; Grice framework; Linear ballistic accumulator; Model falsifiability

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; PROBABILITY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; REACTION TIME; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DECISION MAKING; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROBABILITY; REACTION TIME; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTIONS; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES;

EID: 84893482823     PISSN: 0033295X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0035482     Document Type: Erratum

References (59)

1. Bogacz, R., & Gurney, K. (2007). The basal ganglia and cortex implement optimal decision making between alternative actions. Neural Computation, 19, 442-477. doi:10.1162/neco.2007.19.2.442
2. Brown, S., & Heathcote, A. (2005). A ballistic model of choice response time. Psychological Review, 112, 117-128. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.117
3. Brown, S., & Heathcote, A. (2008). The simplest complete model of choice response time: Linear ballistic accumulation. Cognitive Psychology, 57, 153-178. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.12.002
4. Buonocore, A., Nobile, A. G., & Ricciardi, L. M. (1987). A new integral equation for the evaluation of first-passage-time probability densities. Advances in Applied Probability, 19, 784-800. doi:10.2307/1427102
5. Busemeyer, J., & Townsend, J. T. (1993). Decision field theory: A dynamiccognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. Psychological Review, 100, 432-459. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.432
6. Diederich, A. (1997). Dynamic stochastic models for decision making under time constraints. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 41, 260-274. doi:10.1006/jmps.1997.1167
7. Diller, D. E., Nobel, P. A., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2001). An ARC-REM model for accuracy and response time in recognition and recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 414-435. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.27.2.414
8. Donkin, C., Averell, L., Brown, S. D., & Heathcote, A. (2009). Getting more from accuracy and response time data: Methods for fitting the linear ballistic accumulator model. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 41, 1095-1110. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.1095
9. Donkin, C., Brown, S. D., & Heathcote, A. (2009). The over-constraint of response time models: Rethinking the scaling problem. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 1129-1135. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.6.1129
10. Donkin, C., Brown, S., Heathcote, A., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2011). Diffusion versus linear ballistic accumulation: Different models for response time, same conclusions about psychological mechanisms? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 55, 140-151.
11. Donkin, C., & Little, D. R. (2013). Response time models without withintrial variability are robust to changes in their distributional assumptions. Manuscript submitted for publication.
12. Draglia, V. P., Tartakovsky, A. G., & Veeravalli, V. V. (1999). Multihypothesis sequential probability ratio tests. Part I: Asymptotic optimality. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 45, 2448-2461. doi:10.1109/18.796383
13. Durbin, J. (1971). Boundary-crossing probabilities for the Brownian motion and Poisson processes and techniques for computing the power of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Journal of Applied Probability, 8, 431-453. doi:10.2307/3212169
14. Dzhafarov, E. N. (1993). Grice-representability of response time distribution families. Psychometrika, 58, 281-314. doi:10.1007/BF02294577
15. Feller, W. (1968). An introduction to probability theory and its applications (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Wiley.
16. Filimon, F., Philiastides, M. G., Nelson, J. D., Kloosterman, N. A., & Heekeren, H. R. (2013). How embodied is perceptual decision making? Evidence for separate processing of perceptual and motor decisions. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 2121-2136. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2334-12.2013
17. Fortet, R. (1943). Les fonctions aléatoires du type Markoffassociées á certaines équations linéaires aux derivées partielles du type parabolique [Random functions of Markov type associated with certain linear partial differential equations of parabolic type]. Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées, 22, 177-243.
18. Grice, G. R. (1968). Stimulus intensity and response evocation. Psychological Review, 75, 359-373. doi:10.1037/h0026287
19. Grice, G. R. (1972). Application of a variable criterion model to auditory reaction time as a function of the type of catch trial. Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 103-107. doi:10.3758/BF03212853
20. Grice, G. R., Canham, L., & Boroughs, J. M. (1984). Combination rule for redundant information in reaction time tasks with divided attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 451-463. doi:10.3758/BF03203922
21. Grice, G. R., Nullmeyer, R., & Spiker, V. A. (1982). Human reaction time: Toward a general theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 135-153. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.111.1.135
22. Hanes, D. P., & Schall, J. D. (1996). Neural control of voluntary movement initiation. Science, 274, 427-430. doi:10.1126/science.274.5286.427
23. Heathcote, A., & Love, J. (2012). Linear deterministic accumulator models of simple choice. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 292. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00292
24. Jones, M., Curran, T., Mozer, M. C., & Wilder, M. H. (2013). Sequential effects in response time reveal learning mechanisms and event representations. Psychological Review, 120, 628-666.
25. Jones, M., Mozer, M. C., & Kinoshita, S. (2009). Optimal response initiation: Why recent experience matters. In D. Koller, D. Schuurmans, Y. Bengio, & L. Bottou (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (Vol. 21, pp. 788-795). Redhook, NY: Curran Associates.
26. Krajbich, I., Armel, C., & Rangel, A. (2010). Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice. Nature Neuroscience, 13, 1292-1298. doi:10.1038/nn.2635
27. Laming, D. R. J. (1968). Information theory of choice reaction time. New York, NY: Wiley.
28. Link, S. W., & Heath, R. A. (1975). A sequential theory of psychological discrimination. Psychometrika, 40, 77-105. doi:10.1007/BF02291481
29. Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
30. Malmberg, K. J. (2008). Recognition memory: A review of the critical findings and an integrated theory for relating them. Cognitive Psychology, 57, 335-384. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.02.004
31. Marley, A. A. J., & Colonius, H. (1992). The "horse race" random utility model for choice probabilities and reaction times, and its competing risk interpretation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 36, 1-20. doi: 10.1016/0022-2496(92)90050-H
32. Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. New York, NY: Freeman.
33. Mazurek, M. E., Roitman, J. D., Ditterich, J., & Shadlen, M. N. (2003). A role for neural integrators in perceptual decision making. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 1257-1269. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhg097
34. McClelland, J. L. (1979). On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. Psychological Review, 86, 287-330. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.86.4.287
35. Nosofsky, R. M., & Palmeri, T. J. (1997). An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. Psychological Review, 104, 266-300. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.266
36. Palmer, J., Huk, A. C., & Shadlen, M. N. (2005). The effect of stimulus strength on the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision. Journal of Vision, 5, 376-404. doi:10.1167/5.5.1
37. Pólya, G. (1920). Über den zentralen Grenzwertsatz der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung und das Momentenproblem [On the central limit theorem of probability theory and the moment problem]. Mathematische Zeitschrift, 8, 171-181. doi:10.1007/BF01206525
38. Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59-108. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.85.2.59
39. Ratcliff, R. (2013). Parameter variability and distributional assumptions in the diffusion model. Psychological Review, 120, 281-292. doi:10.1037/a0030775
40. Ratcliff, R., Gomez, P., & McKoon, G. (2004). A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task. Psychological Review, 111, 159-182. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.1.159
41. Ratcliff, R., & Rouder, J. N. (1998). Modeling response times for twochoice decisions. Psychological Science, 9, 347-356. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00067
42. Ratcliff, R., & Smith, P. L. (2004). A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. Psychological Review, 111, 333-367. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.333
43. Ratcliff, R., & Starns, J. J. (2009). Modeling confidence and response time in recognition memory. Psychological Review, 116, 59-83. doi: 10.1037/a0014086
44. Ratcliff, R., Thapar, A., & McKoon, G. (2001). The effects of aging on reaction time in a signal detection task. Psychology and Aging, 16, 323-341. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.16.2.323
45. Ratcliff, R., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2002). Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 438-481. doi:10.3758/BF03196302
46. Ratcliff, R., Van Zandt, T., & McKoon, G. (1999). Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. Psychological Review, 106, 261-300. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.106.2.261
47. Ricciardi, L. M., & Sato, S. (1988). First-passage-time density and moments of the Ornstein Uhlenbeck process. Journal of Applied Probability, 25, 43-57. doi:10.2307/3214232
48. Roe, R. M., Busemeyer, J., & Townsend, J. T. (2001). Multialternative decision field theory: A dynamic artificial neural network model of decision making. Psychological Review, 108, 370-392. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.370
49. Roitman, J. D., & Shadlen, M. N. (2002). Response of neurons in the lateral intraparietal area during a combined visual discrimination reaction time task. The Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 9475-9489.
50. Smith, P. L. (2000). Stochastic dynamic models of response time and accuracy: A foundational primer. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, 408-463. doi:10.1006/jmps.1999.1260
51. Spivey, M. J., Grosjean, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 10393-10398. doi:10.1073/pnas.0503903102
52. Starns, J. J., Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2012). Evaluating the unequalvariability and dualprocess explanations of zROC slopes with response time data and the diffusion model. Cognitive Psychology, 64, 1-34. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.10.002
53. Stone, M. (1960). Models for choice reaction time. Psychometrika, 25, 251-260. doi:10.1007/BF02289729
54. Thomas, R. D. (2006). Processing time predictions of current models of perception in the classic additive factors paradigm. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 50, 441-455. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2006.05.006
55. Townsend, J. T. (1976). Serial and within-stage independent parallel model equivalence on the minimum completion time. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 14, 219-238. doi:10.1016/0022-2496(76)90003-1
56. Townsend, J. T., & Altieri, N. (2012). An accuracy-response time capacity assessment function that measures performance against standard parallel predictions. Psychological Review, 119, 500-516. doi:10.1037/a0028448
57. Townsend, J. T., Houpt, J. W., & Silbert, N. H. (2012). General recognition theory extended to include response times: Predictions for a class of parallel systems. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56, 476-494. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2012.09.001
58. Townsend, J. T., & Wenger, M. J. (2004). A theory of interactive parallel processing: New capacity measures and predictions for a response time inequality series. Psychological Review, 111, 1003-1035. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1003
59. Usher, M., & McClelland, J. L. (2001). The time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychological Review, 108, 550-592. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.550