A theory of interactive parallel processing: New capacity measures and predictions for a response time inequality series

Psychological Review

Volumn 111, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 1003-1035

  Townsend, James T ^a,b   Wenger, Michael J ^c  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Hanse Wissenschaftskolleg ^*  (Germany)

^c PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROBABILITY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; REACTION TIME; REVIEW; STATISTICS;

COGNITION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PERCEPTION; PROBABILITY; REACTION TIME; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES;

EID: 5644244379     PISSN: 0033295X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1003     Document Type: Review

References (161)

1. Adini, Y., Sagi, D., & Tsodyks, M. (2002, February 14). Context-enabled learning in the human visual system. Nature, 415, 790-793.
2. Allison, P. D. (1995). Survival analysis using the SAS system: A practical guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
3. Amazeen, E. L. (1999). Perceptual independence of size and weight by dynamic touch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 102-119.
4. Anderson, J. A. (1993). The BSB model: A simple nonlinear autoassociative neural network. In M. Hassoun (Ed.), Associative neural memories (pp. 77-103). New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Ashby, F. G. (1982). Deriving exact predictions from the cascade model. Psychological Review, 89, 599-607.
6. Ashby, F. G. (1983). A biased random walk model for two choice reaction times. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 27, 277-297.
7. Ashby, F. G. (1989). Stochastic general recognition theory. In D. Vickers & P. L. Smith (Eds.), Human information processing: Measures, mechanisms, and models (pp. 435-457). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
8. Ashby, F. G. (2000). A stochastic version of general recognition theory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, 310-329.
9. Ashby, F. G., Alfonso-Reese, L. A., Turken, A. U., & Waldron, E. M. (1999). A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. Psychological Review, 105, 442-481.
10. Ashby, F. G., & Townsend, J. T. (1986). Varieties of perceptual independence. Psychological Review, 93, 154-179.
11. Atkinson, R. C., Holmgren, J. R., & Juola, J. F. (1969). Processing time as influenced by the number of elements in a visual display. Perception & Psychophysics, 6, 321-326.
12. Audley, R. J., & Pike, A. R. (1965). Some alternative stochastic models of choice. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 18, 207-225.
13. Bartlett, J. C., & Searcy, J. (1993). Inversion and configuration of faces. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 281-316.
14. Bar-Yam, Y. (1997). Dynamics of complex systems. Reading, MA: Perseus Books.
15. Bernstein, I. H. (1970). Can we see and hear at the same time? Some recent studies of intersensory facilitation of reaction time. Acta Psychologica, 33, 21-35.
16. Biederman, I., & Kalocsai, P. (1998). Neural and psychophysical analysis of object and face recognition. In H. Wechsler, P. J. Phillips, V. Bruce, F. F. Soulie, & T. Huang (Eds.), Face recognition: From theory to applications (Vol. NATO ASI Series F, pp. 3-25). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
17. Bishop, C. M. (1995). Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford, England: Clarendon.
18. Busemeyer, J. B., & Townsend, J. T. (1993). Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. Psychological Review, 100, 432-459.
19. Busey, T. A., & Townsend, J. T. (2001). Independent sampling vs. inter-item dependencies in whole report processing: Contributions of processing architecture and variable attention. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 45, 283-323.
20. Collett, D. (1994). Modeling survival data in medical research. London: Chapman & Hall.
21. Colonius, H. (1990). Possibly dependent probability summation of reaction time. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 34, 253-275.
22. Colonius, H., & Townsend, J. T. (1997). Activation-state representation of models for the redundant-signals-effect. In A. A. J. Marley (Ed.). Choice, decision, and measurement: Essays in honor of R. Duncan Luce (pp. 245-254). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Colonius, H., & Vorberg, D. (1994). Distribution inequalities for parallel models with unlimited capacity. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 38, 35-58.
24. Cooper, G. R., & McGillem, C. D. (1999). Probabilistic methods of signal and system analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
25. Cottrell, G. W., Dailey, M. N., Padgett, C., & Adolphs, R. (2001). Is all face processing holistic? The view from UCSD. In M. J. Wenger & J. T. Townsend (Eds.), Computational, geometric, and process perspectives on facial cognition: Contexts and challenges (pp. 347-396). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Cox, D. R., & Oakes, D. (1984). Analysis of survival data. London: Chapman & Hall.
27. Czerwinski, M., Lightfoot, N., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1992). Automatization and training in visual search. American Journal of Psychology, 105, 271-315.
28. Davenport, W. B., & Roet, W. L. (1958). An introduction to the theory of random signals and noise. New York: McGraw Hill.
29. Diederich, A. (1991). Intersensory facilitation: Race, superposition, and diffusion models for reaction time to multiple stimuli. Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.
30. Diederich, A. (1995). Intersensory facilitation of reaction time: Evaluation of counter and diffusion coactivation models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39, 197-215.
31. Diederich, A., & Colonius, H. (1991). A further test of the superposition model for the redundant-signals effect in bimodal detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 83-86.
32. Dosher, B. A. (1979). Empirical approaches to information processing: Speed-accuracy tradeoff functions or reaction time - A reply. Acta Psychologica, 43, 347-359.
33. Dosher, B. A. (1984). Degree of learning and retrieval speed: Study time and multiple exposures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 541-574.
34. Dosher, B. A., & Liu, Z. L. (1999). Mechanisms of perceptual learning. Vision Research, 39, 3197-3221.
35. Dosher, B. A., & Liu, Z. L. (2000). Noise exclusion in spatial attention. Psychological Science, 11, 139-146.
36. Dosher, B. A., & Sperling, G. (1998). A century of human information-processing theory: Vision, attention, and memory. In J. Hochberg (Ed.), Perception and cognition at century's end. Handbook of perception and cognition (2nd ed., pp. 199-252). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
37. Dzhafarov, E. N. (1993). Grice-representability of response time distribution families. Psychometrika, 58, 281-314.
38. Dzhafarov, E., & Bückenholt, U. (1995). Decomposition of recurrent choices into stochastically independent counts. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39, 40-56.
39. Egeth, H. (1966). Parallel versus serial processes in multidimensional stimulus discrimination. Perception & Psychophysics, 1, 245-252.
40. Egeth, H. E., & Dagenbach, D. (1991). Parallel versus serial processing in visual search: Further evidence from subadditive effects of a visual quality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 550-559.
41. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
42. Eriksen, C. W., & Spencer, T. (1969). Rate of information processing in visual perception: Some results and some methodological considerations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 79(2, Pt. 2), 1-16.
43. Farah, M. J., Wilson, K. D., Drain, M., & Tanaka, J. N. (1998). What is "special" about face perception? Psychological Review, 105, 482-498.
44. Fisher, D. L. (1984). Central capacity limits in consistent mapping, visual search tasks: Four channels or more? Cognitive Psychology, 16, 449-484.
45. Fréchet, M. (1951). Sur les tableaux de corrélation dont les marges sont donnés [On tables of correlation when the margins are given]. Annales de l'Universite de Lyon, Section A, Séries 3, 14, 53-77.
46. Goldstone, R. L. (1998). Perceptual learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 585-612.
47. Goldstone, R. L. (2000). Unitization during category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 86-112.
48. Grice, G. R., Boroughs, J. M., & Canham, L. (1984). Temporal dynamics of associative interference and facilitation produced by visual context. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 499-507.
49. Grice, G. R., Canham, L., & Boroughs, J. M. (1984). Combination rule for redundant information in reaction time tasks with divided attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 451-463.
50. Grice, G. R., Canham, L., & Gwynne, J. W. (1984). Absence of a redundant signals effect in a reaction time task with divided attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 565-570.
51. Grossberg, S. (1978). Competition, decision, and consensus. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 66, 470-493.
52. Grossberg, S. (1991a). Nonlinear neural networks: Principles, mechanisms, and architectures. In G. A. Carpenter & S. Grossberg (Eds.), Pattern recognition by self-organizing neural networks (pp. 36-109). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
53. Grossberg, S. (1991b). Unitization, automaticity, temporal order, and word recognition. In G. A. Carpenter & S. Grossberg (Eds.), Pattern recognition by self-organizing neural networks (pp. 595-614). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54. Heath, R. A. (2000). Nonlinear dynamics: Techniques and applications in psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
55. Hughes, H. C., & Townsend, J. T. (1998). Varieties of binocular interaction in human vision. Psychological Science, 9, 53-60.
56. Ingvalson, E. M., & Wenger, M. J. (in press). A strong test of the dual mode hypothesis. Perception & Psychophysics.
57. Kadlec, H. (1992). Information processing of stimulus modules and dimensions in visual perception: Independence and interactions. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
58. Kadlec, H. (1999, July). Emergent properties as perceptual interactions in the general recognition theory. Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Society for Mathematical Psychology, Santa Cruz, CA.
59. Kadlec, H., & Hicks, C. L. (1998). Invariance of perceptual spaces and perceptual separability of stimulus dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 80-104.
60. Kadlec, H., & Townsend, J. T. (1992a). Implications of marginal and conditional detection parameters for the separabilities and independence of perceptual dimensions. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 36, 325-374.
61. Kadlec, H., & Townsend, J. T. (1992b). Signal detection analysis of dimensional interactions. In F. G. Ashby (Ed.), Multidimensional models of perception and cognition (pp. 181-228). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
62. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
63. Kantowitz, B. H. (1978). On the accuracy of speed-accuracy tradeoff. Acta Psychologica, 42, 79-80.
64. Kantowitz, B. H. (1985). Channels and stages in human information processing: A limited analysis of theory and methodology. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 29, 135-174.
65. Kantowitz, B. H., & Knight, J. L. (1976). On experimenter-limited processes. Psychological Review, 83, 502-507.
66. Kohonen, T. (1989). Self-organization and associative memory (3rd ed.). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
67. Kuehn, S. M., & Jolicoeur, P. (1994). Impact of the quality of the image, orientation, and similarity of the stimuli on visual search for faces. Perception, 23, 95-122.
68. Lacouture, Y., & Marley, A. A. J. (1995). A mapping model of bow effects in absolute identification. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39, 383-395.
69. Link, S. W., & Heath, R. A. (1975). A sequential theory of psychological discrimination. Psychometrika, 40, 77-105.
70. Liu, Y. (1996). Queuing network modeling of elementary mental processes. Psychological Review, 103, 116-136.
71. Loftus, G. R., Busey, T. A., & Senders, J. W. (1993). Providing a sensory basis for models of visual information acquisition. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 535-554.
72. Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527.
73. Logan, G. D., Taylor, S. E., & Etherton, J. L. (1996). Attention in the acquisition and expression of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 620-638.
74. Luce, R. D. (1986). Reaction times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
75. Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997, November 20). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279-281.
76. Luenberger, D. G. (1979). Introduction to dynamic systems: Theory, models and applications. New York: Wiley.
77. Maddox, W. T. (1992). Perceptual and decisional separability. In F. G. Ashby (Ed.), Multidimensional models of perception and cognition (pp. 147-180). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
78. Marley, A. A. J. (1992). Developing and characterizing multidimensional Thurstone and Luce models for identification and preference. In F. G. Ashby (Ed.), Multidimensional models of perception and cognition (pp. 299-334). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
79. Massaro, D. W. (1998). Perceiving talking faces: From speech perception to a general principle. Cambridge, MA: Bradford.
80. MathWorks. (2001). Matlab 6.1 [Computer software]. Natick, MA: Author.
81. McClelland, J. L. (1979). On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. Psychological Review, 86, 287-330.
82. Mignault, A., & Marley, A. A. J. (in press). A real-time neuronal model of classical conditioning. Adaptive Behavior.
83. Miller, J. O. (1982). Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 247-279.
84. Miller, J. (1986). Timecourse and coactivation in bimodal divided attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 331-343.
85. Miller, J. (1991). Channel interaction and the redundant-targets effect in bimodal divided attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 160-169.
86. Miller, J. O. (1993). A queue-series model for reaction time, with discretestage and continuous-flow models as special cases. Psychological Review, 100, 702-715.
87. Miller, J. (1999). Effects of stimulus-response probability on choice reaction time: Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1521-1534.
88. Mordkoff, J. T. (1996). Selective attention and internal constraints: There is more to the flanker effect than biased contingencies. In A. F. Kramer & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.), Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 483-502). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
89. Mordkoff, J. T., & Egeth, H. E. (1993). Response time and accuracy revisited: Converging support for the interactive race model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 981-991.
90. Mordkoff, J. T., & Yantis, S. (1991). An interactive race model of divided attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 520-538.
91. Movellan, J. R., & McClelland, J. L. (2001). The Morton-Massaro law of information integration: Implications for models of perception. Psychological Review, 108, 113-148.
92. O'Toole, A. J., Wenger, M. J., & Townsend, J. T. (2001). Quantitative models of perceiving and remembering faces: Precedents and possibilities. In M. J. Wenger & J. T. Townsend (Eds.), Computational, geometric, and process perspectives on facial cognition: Contexts and challenges (pp. 1-38). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
93. Pachella, R. (1974). The interpretation of reaction time in information processing research. In B. H. Kantowitz (Ed.), Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition (pp. 41-82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
94. Pansky, A., & Algom, D. (1999). Stroop and Garner effects in comparative judgment of numerals: The role of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 39-59.
95. Papoulis, A. (1991). Probability, random variables, and stochastic processes. New York: McGraw-Hill.
96. Parzen, E. (1960). Modern probability theory and its applications. New York: Wiley.
97. Perrin, N. A. (1992). Uniting identification, similarity, and preference: General recognition theory. In F. G. Ashby (Ed.), Multidimensional models of perception and cognition (pp. 123-146). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
98. Pike, A. R. (1973). Response latency models for signal detection. Psychological Review, 80, 53-68.
99. Pizlo, Z., Salach-Golyska, M., & Rosenfeld, A. (1997). Curve detection in a noisy image. Vision Research, 37, 1217-1241.
100. Raab, D. H. (1962). Statistical facilitation of simple reaction times. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 24, 574-590.
101. Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59-108.
102. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1997). A counter model for implicit priming in perceptual word identification. Psychological Review, 104, 319-343.
103. Ratcliff, R., Van Zandt, T., & McKoon, G. (1999). Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. Psychological Review, 106, 261-300.
104. Reicher, G. M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 275-280.
105. Ross, S. M. (1997). Introduction to probability models (6th ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
106. Rouder, J. N. (2000). Assessing the roles of change discrimination and luminance integration: Evidence for a hybrid race model of perceptual decision making in luminance discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 359-378.
107. Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
108. Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: II. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review, 89, 60-94.
109. Schweickert, R. (1989). Separable effects of factors on activation functions in discrete and continuous models: d′ and evoked potentials. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 318-328.
110. Schweickert, R., & Boggs, G. J. (1984). Models of central capacity and concurrency. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 28, 223-281.
111. Schweickert, R., & Mounts, J. (1998). Additive effects of factors on reaction time and evoked potentials in continuous-flow models. In C. E. Dowling & F. S. Roberts (Eds.), Recent progress in mathematical psychology: Psychophysics, knowledge, representation, cognition, and measurement (pp. 311-327). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
112. Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379-423.
113. Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1963). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
114. Shiffrin, R. M. (1976). Capacity limitations in information processing, attention, and memory. In W. K. Estes (Ed.), Handbook of learning and cognitive processes: Memory processes (Vol. 4, pp. 25-68). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
115. Shiffrin, R. M., & Gardner, G. T. (1972). Visual processing capacity and attentional control. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 93, 72-82.
116. Shiffrin, R. M., & Steyvers, M. (1997). A model for recognition memory: REM - Retrieving effectively from memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 145-166.
117. Smith, P. L. (1995). Psychophysically principled models of visual simple reaction time. Psychological Review, 102, 567-593.
118. Smith, P. L. (2000). Stochastic dynamic models of response time and accuracy: A foundational primer. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, 408-463.
119. Smith, P. L., & Vickers, D. (1989). Modeling evidence accumulation with partial loss in expanded judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 797-815.
120. Smith, P. L., & Zandt, T. V. (2000). Time-dependent Poisson counter models of response latency in simple judgment. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 53, 293-315.
121. Sternberg, S. (1966, August 5). High-speed scanning in human memory. Science, 153, 652-654.
122. Suzuki, S., & Cavanagh, P. (1995). Facial organization blocks access to low-level features: An object inferiority effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 901-913.
123. Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 46(A), 225-245.
124. Tanaka, J. W., & Sengco, J. A. (1997). Features and their configuration in face recognition. Memory & Cognition, 25, 583-592.
125. Thomas, E. A. (1971). Sufficient conditions for monotone hazard rate: An application to latency-probability curves. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 8, 303-332.
126. Thomas, R. D. (1995). Gaussian general recognition theory and perceptual independence. Psychological Review, 102, 192-200.
127. Thomas, R. D. (1996). Separability and independence of dimensions within the same-different judgment task. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 40, 318-341.
128. Townsend, J. T. (1971). Theoretical analysis of an alphabetic confusion matrix. Perception & Psychophysics, 9, 40-50.
129. Townsend, J. T. (1972). Some results concerning the identifiability of parallel and serial processes. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 25, 168-199.
130. Townsend, J. T. (1974). Issues and models concerning the processing of a finite number of inputs. In B. H. Kantowitz (Ed.), Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition (pp. 133-168). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
131. Townsend, J. T. (1976). Serial and within-stage independent parallel model equivalence on the minimum completion time. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 14, 219-238.
132. Townsend, J. T. (1981). Some characteristics of visual whole report behavior. Acta Psychologica, 47, 149-173.
133. Townsend, J. T. (1984). Uncovering mental processes with factorial experiments. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 28, 363-400.
134. Townsend, J. T. (1990a). Serial vs. parallel processing: Sometimes they look like tweedledum and tweedledee but they can (and should be) distinguished. Psychological Sciences, 1, 46-54.
135. Townsend, J. T. (1990b). Truth and consequences of ordinal differences in statistical distributions: Toward a theory of hierarchical inference. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 551-567.
136. Townsend, J. T. (1992). Chaos theory: A brief tutorial and discussion. In A. F. Healy, S. M. Kosslyn, & R. M. Shiffrin (Eds.), From learning theory to connectionist theory: Essays in honor of William K. Estes (Vol. 1, pp. 65-96). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
137. Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1978). Methods of modeling capacity in simple processing systems. In J. Castellan & F. Restle (Eds.), Cognitive theory (Vol. 3, pp. 200-239). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
138. Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1983). Stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
139. Townsend, J. T., & Fikes, T. (1995). A beginning quantitative taxonomy of cognitive activation systems and application to continuous flow processes (Tech. Rep. No. 131). Indiana University Bloomington, Cognitive Science Program.
140. Townsend, J. T., Hu, G. G., & Evans, R. J. (1984). Modeling feature perception in brief displays with evidence for positive interdependencies. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 35-49.
141. Townsend, J. T., & Nozawa, G. (1995). On the spatio-temporal properties of elementary perception: An investigation of parallel, serial, and coactive theories. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39, 321-359.
142. Townsend, J. T., & Nozawa, G. (1997). Serial exhaustive models can violate the race model inequality: Implications for architecture and capacity. Psychological Review, 104, 595-602.
143. Townsend, J. T., & Wenger, M. J. (1996). Evidence monitoring theory: A dynamic extension of general recognition theory and cognitive stochastic processing theory. Chapel Hill, NC: Society for Mathematical Psychology.
144. Townsend, J. T., & Wenger, M. J. (1999, November). Evidence monitoring theory: Foundation and experimental application. Paper presented at the 40th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles, CA.
145. Townsend, J. T., & Wenger, M. J. (2004a). The costs and benefits of faces and words. Manuscript in preparation.
146. Townsend, J. T., & Wenger, M. J. (2004b). The serial-parallel dilemma: A case study in a linkage of theory and method. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 391-418.
147. Usher, M., & McClelland, J. L. (2001). On the time course of perceptual choice: The leaky competing accumulator model. Psychological Review, 108, 550-592.
148. Van Gelder, T. (1998). The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 1-14.
149. Van Zandt, T. (2002). Analysis of response time distributions. In J. T. Wixted (Ed.), Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology (3rd ed., pp. 461-516). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
150. Van Zandt, T., Colonius, H., & Proctor, R. W. (2000). A comparison of two response time models applied to perceptual matching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 208-256.
151. Ward, L. M. (2002). Dynamical cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
152. Weisstein, N., & Harris, C. S. (1974, November 22). Visual detection of line segments: An object superiority effect. Science, 186, 752-755.
153. Wenger, M. J. (1999). On the whats and hows of retrieval in the acquisition of a simple skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1137-1160.
154. Wenger, M. J., & Gibson, B. S. (2004). Using hazard functions to assess changes in processing capacity in an attentional cuing paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 708-719.
155. Wenger, M. J., & Ingvalson, E. M. (2002). A decisional component of holistic encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 872-892.
156. Wenger, M. J., & Ingvalson, E. M. (2003). Preserving informational separability and violating decisional separability in facial perception and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1106-1118.
157. Wenger, M. J., & Townsend, J. T. (2000a). Basic response time tools for studying general processing capacity in attention, perception, and cognition. Journal of General Psychology, 127, 67-99.
158. Wenger, M. J., & Townsend, J. T. (2000b, July). Tracking capacity in object and face perception: New measures and new findings. Paper presented at the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Society for Mathematical Psychology, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
159. Wenger, M. J., & Townsend, J. T. (2001). Faces as gestalt stimuli: Process characteristics. In M. J. Wenger & J. T. Townsend (Eds.), Computational, geometric, and process perspectives on facial cognition (pp. 229-284). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
160. Wheeler, D. D. (1970). Processes in word identification. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 59-85.
161. Wickelgren, W. A. (1977). Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics. Acta Psychologica, 41, 67-85.