MS2PIP: A tool for MS/MS peak intensity prediction

Bioinformatics

Volumn 29, Issue 24, 2013, Pages 3199-3203

  Degroeve, Sven ^a,b   Martens, Lennart ^a,b   Jurisica, Igor ^c  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SYSTEMS BIOLOGY   (Belgium)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PEPTIDE FRAGMENT; PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; HUMAN; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEOMICS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOFTWARE; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; HUMANS; PEPTIDE FRAGMENTS; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOFTWARE; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84893048557     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt544     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Arnold, R.J. et al. (2006) A machine learning approach to predicting peptide fragmentation spectra. In: Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. pp. 219-230.
2. Barton, S.J. and Whittaker, J.C. (2009) Review of factors that influence the abundance of ions produced in a tandem mass spectrometer and statistical methods for discovering these factors. Mass Spectrom. Rev., 28, 177-187.
3. Breiman, L. (2001) Random Forests. Machine Learning, 45, 5-32.
4. Craig, R. and Beavis, R.C. (2004) TANDEM: matching proteins with tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics, 20, 1466-1467.
5. Degroeve, S. et al. (2011) A reproducibility-based evaluation procedure for quantifying the differences between MS/MS peak intensity normalization methods. Proteomics, 11, 1172-1180.
6. Elias, J.E. et al. (2004) Intensity-based protein identification by machine learning from a library of tandem mass spectra. Nat. Biotechnol., 22, 214-219.
7. Geer, L.Y. et al. (2004) Open mass spectrometry search algorithm. J. Proteome Res., 3, 958-964.
8. Helsens, K. et al. (2010) ms-lims, a simple yet powerful open source laboratory information management system for MS-driven proteomics. Proteomics, 10, 1261-1264.
9. Lam, H. et al. (2007) Development and validation of a spectral library searching method for peptide identification from MS/MS. Proteomics, 7, 655-667.
10. Li, S. et al. (2011) On the accuracy and limits of peptide fragmentation spectrum prediction. Anal. Chem., 83, 790-796.
11. Narasimhan, C. et al. (2005) MASPIC: intensity-based tandem mass spectrometry scoring scheme that improves peptide identification at high confidence. Anal. Chem., 77, 7581-7593.
12. Paulovich, A.G. et al. (2010) Interlaboratory study characterizing a yeast performance standard for benchmarking LC-MS platform performance. Mol. Cell. Proteomics, 9, 242-254.
13. Perkins, D.N. et al. (1999) Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis, 20, 3551-3567.
14. Sadygov, R. et al. (2006) Central limit theorem as an approximation for intensity based scoring function. Anal. Chem., 78, 89-95.
15. Tabb, D.L. et al. (2007) MyriMatch: highly accurate tandem mass spectral peptide identification by multivariate hypergeometric analysis. J. Proteome Res., 6, 654-661.
16. Vandermarliere, E. et al. (2013) Getting intimate with trypsin, the leading protease in proteomics. Mass Spectrom. Rev., [Epub ahead of print, doi:10.1002/mas.21376, June 15, 2013].
17. Vaudel, M. et al. (2011) Peptide identification quality control. Proteomics, 11, 2105-2114.
18. Zhang, Z. (2004) Prediction of low-energy collision-induced dissociation spectra of peptides. Anal. Chem., 76, 3908-3922.
19. Zhang, Z. (2005) Prediction of low-energy collision-induced dissociation spectra of peptides with three or more charges. Anal. Chem., 77, 6364-6373.
20. Zhou, C. et al. (2008) A machine learning approach to explore the spectra intensity pattern of peptides using tandem mass spectrometry data. BMC Bioinformatics, 9, 325.