A reproducibility-based evaluation procedure for quantifying the differences between MS/MS peak intensity normalization methods

Proteomics

Volumn 11, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1172-1180

  Degroeve, Sven ^a,b   Colaert, Niklaas ^a,b   Vandekerckhove, Joël ^a,b   Gevaert, Kris ^a,b   Martens, Lennart ^a,b  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SYSTEMS BIOLOGY   (Belgium)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Bioinformatics; Intensity normalization; Peptide fragmentation; Peptide identification

Indexed keywords

METHANEARSONATE DISODIUM; PEPTIDE FRAGMENT; PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATA MINING; DISPERSION; FLOOD TIDE; FRAGMENTATION REACTION; INFORMATION; KNOWLEDGE; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PIPELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRODUCTIVITY; PROTEOMICS; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DATABASES, PROTEIN; HUMANS; PEPTIDES; PROTEOMICS; QUALITY CONTROL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

EID: 79952308634     PISSN: 16159853     EISSN: 16159861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201000605     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Aebersold, R., Mann, M., Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature 2003, 422, 198-207.
2. Roepstorff, P., Fohlman, J., Proposal for a common nomenclature for sequence ions in mass spectra of peptides. Biomed. Mass Spectrom. 1984, 11, 601.
3. Johnson, R. S., Martin, S. A., Biemann, K., Stults, J. T., Watson, J. T., Novel fragmentation process of peptides by collision-induced decomposition in a tandem mass spectrometer: differentiation of leucine and isoleucine. Anal. Chem. 1987, 59, 2621-2625.
4. Nesvizhskii, A. I., Aebersold, R., Interpretation of shotgun proteomic data: the protein inference problem. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2005, 4, 1419-1440.
5. Vizcaíno, J. A., Côté, R., Reisinger, F., Foster, J. M. et al., A guide to the proteomics identifications database proteomics data repository. Proteomics 2009, 9, 4276-4283.
6. Craig, R., Cortens, J. P., Beavis, R. C., Open source system for analyzing, validating, and storing protein identification data. J. Proteome Res. 2004, 3, 1234-1242.
7. Desiere, F., Deutsch, E. W., King, N. L., Nesvizhskii, A. I. et al., The PeptideAtlas project. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, D655-D658.
8. Frank, A. M., Predicting intensity ranks of peptide fragment ions research articles. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 2226-2240.
9. Elias, J. E., Gibbons, F. D., King, O. D., Roth, F. P., Gygi, S. P., Intensity-based protein identification by machine learning from a library of tandem mass spectra. Nat. Biotechnol. 2004, 22, 214-219.
10. Klammer, A. A., Reynolds, S. M., Bilmes, J. A., Maccoss, M. J., Noble, W. S., Modeling peptide fragmentation with dynamic Bayesian networks for peptide identification. Bioinformatics 2008, 24, 348-356.
11. Wan, Y., Yang, A., Chen, T., PepHMM: a hidden Markov model based scoring function for mass spectrometry database search. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 432-437.
12. Havilio, M., Haddad, Y., Similansky, Z., Intensity-based statistical scorer for tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem 2003, 75, 435-444.
13. Colinge, J., Peptide fragment intensity statistical modeling. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79, 7286-7290.
14. Zhou, C., Bowler, L. D., Feng, J., A machine learning approach to explore the spectra intensity pattern of peptides using tandem mass spectrometry data. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 17.
15. Na, S., Paek, E., Quality assessment of tandem mass spectra based on cumulative intensity normalization. J. Proteome Res. 2006, 5, 3241-3248.
16. Nesvizhskii, A. I., Roos, F. F., Grossmann, J., Vogelzang, M. et al., Dynamic spectrum quality assessment and iterative computational analysis of shotgun proteomic data: toward more efficient identification of post-translational modifications, sequence polymorphisms, and novel peptides. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2006, 5, 652-670.
17. Bern, M., Goldberg, D., McDonald, W. H., Yates, J. R., Automatic quality assessment of peptide tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics 2004, 20, i49-i54.
18. Wong, J. W. H., Sullivan, M. J., Cartwright, H. M., Cagney, G., msmsEval: tandem mass spectral quality assignment for high-throughput proteomics. BMC Bioinformatics 2007, 8, 51.
19. Flikka, K., Martens, L., Vandekerckhove, J., Gevaert, K., Eidhammer, I., Improving the reliability and throughput of mass spectrometry-based proteomics by spectrum quality filtering. Proteomics 2006, 6, 2086-2094.
20. Beer, I., Barnea, E., Ziv, T., Admon, A., Improving large-scale proteomics by clustering of mass spectrometry data. Proteomics 2004, 4, 950-960.
21. Flikka, K., Meukens, J., Helsens, K., Vandekerckhove, J. et al., Implementation and application of a versatile clustering tool for tandem mass spectrometry data. Proteomics 2007, 7, 3245-3258.
22. Tabb, D. L., MacCoss, M. J., Wu, C. C., Anderson, S. D., Yates, J. R., Similarity among tandem mass spectra from proteomic experiments: detection, significance, and utility. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 2470-2477.
23. Tabb, D. L., Thompson, M. R., Khalsa-Moyers, G., VerBerkmoes, N. C., McDonald, W. H., MS2Grouper: group assessment and synthetic replacement of duplicate proteomic tandem mass spectra. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2005, 16, 1250-1261.
24. Frank, A. M., Bandeira, N., Shen, Z., Tanner, S. et al., Clustering millions of tandem mass spectra research articles. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 113-122.
25. Lam, H., Deutsch, E. W., Eddes, J. S., Eng, J. K. et al., Development and validation of a spectral library searching method for peptide identification from MS/MS. Proteomics 2007, 7, 655-667.
26. Hummel, J., Niemann, M., Wienkoop, S., Schulze, W. et al., ProMEX: a mass spectral reference database for proteins and protein phosphorylation sites. BMC Bioinformatics 2007, 8, 216.
27. Frewen, B. E., Merrihew, G. E., Wu, C. C., Noble, W. S., MacCoss, M. J., Analysis of peptide MS/MS spectra from large-scale proteomics experiments using spectrum libraries. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 5678-5684.
28. Yen, C., Meyer-Arendt, K., Eichelberger, B., Sun, S. et al., A simulated MS/MS library for spectrum-to-spectrum searching in large scale identification of proteins. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2009, 8, 857-869.
29. Mylonas, R., Mauron, Y., Masselot, A., Binz, P. et al., X-Rank: a robust algorithm for small molecule identification using tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 7604-7610.
30. Renard, B. Y., Kirchner, M., Monigatti, F., Ivanov, A. R. et al., When less can yield more - computational preprocessing of MS/MS spectra for peptide identification. Proteomics 2009, 9, 4978-4984.
31. Helsens, K., Colaert, N., Barsnes, H., Muth, T. et al., ms-lims, a simple yet powerful open source laboratory information management system for MS-driven proteomics. Proteomics 2010, 10, 1261-1264.
32. Gevaert, K., Goethals, M., Martens, L., Van Damme, J. et al., Exploring proteomes and analyzing protein processing by mass spectrometric identification of sorted N-terminal peptides. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003, 21, 566-569.
33. Staes, A., Van Damme, P., Helsens, K., Demol, H. et al., Improved recovery of proteome-informative, protein N-terminal peptides by combined fractional diagonal chromatography (COFRADIC). Proteomics 2008, 8, 1362-1370.
34. Rudnick, P. A., Clauser, K. R., Kilpatrick, L. E., Tchekhovskoi, D. V. et al., Performance metrics for liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry systems in proteomics analyses. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2010, 9, 225-241.
35. Mortensen, P., Gouw, J. W., Olsen, J. V., Ong, S. et al., MSQuant, an open source platform for mass spectrometry-based quantitative proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9, 393-403.
36. Barsnes, H., Eidhammer, I., Martens, L., Fragmentation Analyzer: an open-source tool to analyze MS/MS fragmentation data. Proteomics 2010, 1087-1090.