An automatic method for CASP9 free modeling structure prediction assessment

Bioinformatics

Volumn 27, Issue 24, 2011, Pages 3371-3378

  Cong, Qian ^a   Kinch, Lisa N ^b   Pei, Jimin ^b   Shi, Shuoyong ^b   Grishin, Vyacheslav N ^b   Li, Wenlin ^a   Grishin, Nick V ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BIOLOGY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; METHODOLOGY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE;

AUTOMATION; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS;

EID: 83355177242     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr572     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Aloy, P. et al. (2003) Predictions without templates: new folds, secondary structure, and contacts in CASP5. Proteins, 53 (Suppl. 6), 436-456.
2. Ben-David, M. et al. (2009) Assessment of CASP8 structure predictions for template free targets. Proteins, 77 (Suppl. 9), 50-65.
3. Jauch, R. et al. (2007) Assessment of CASP7 structure predictions for template free targets. Proteins, 69 (Suppl. 8), 57-67.
4. Kinch, L.N. et al. (2003) CASP5 assessment of fold recognition target predictions. Proteins, 53 (Suppl. 6), 395-409.
5. Kinch, L.N. et al. (2011a) CASP9 target classification. Proteins, [Epub ahead of print, doi: 10.1002/prot.23190, September 14, 2011].
6. Kinch, L.N. et al. (2011b) CASP9 assessment of free modeling target predictions. Proteins, [Epub ahead of print, doi: 10.1002/prot.23181, September 14, 2011].
7. Kryshtafovych, A. et al. (2005) Progress over the first decade of CASP experiments. Proteins, 61 (Suppl. 7), 225-236.
8. Majumdar, I. et al. (2005) PALSSE: a program to delineate linear secondary structural elements from protein structures. BMC Bioinformatics, 6, 202.
9. Moult, J. et al. (1995) A large-scale experiment to assess protein structure prediction methods. Proteins, 23, ii-v.
10. Moult, J. (2006) Rigorous performance evaluation in protein structure modelling and implication for computational biology. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 1467, 453-458.
11. Moult, J. et al. (2009) Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction - Round VIII. Proteins, 77 (Suppl. 9), 1-4.
12. Ortiz, A.R. et al. (2002) MAMMOTH (matching molecular models obtained from theory): an automated method for model comparison. Protein Sci., 11, 2606-2621.
13. Shi, S. et al. (2009) Analysis of CASP8 targets, predictions and assessment methods. Database, 2009, bap003.
14. Tai, C.H. et al. (2005) Evaluation of domain prediction in CASP6. Proteins, 61 (Suppl. 7), 183-192.
15. Zemla, A. et al. (1999a) A modified definition of Sov, a segment-based measure for protein secondary structure prediction assessment. Proteins, 34, 220-223.
16. Zemla, A. et al. (1999b) Processing and analysis of CASP3 protein structure predictions. Proteins, (Suppl. 3), 22-29.
17. Zemla, A. et al. (2001) Processing and evaluation of predictions in CASP4. Proteins, 45 (Suppl. 5), 13-21.
18. Zemla, A. (2003) LGA: amethod for finding 3Dsimilarities in protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res., 31, 3370-3374.
19. Zhang, Y. and Skolnick, J. (2005) TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score. Nucleic Acids Res., 33, 2302-2309.