Structural footprinting in protein structure comparison: The impact of structural fragments

BMC Structural Biology

Volumn 7, Issue , 2007, Pages

  Zotenko, Elena ^a,c   Islamaj Dogan, Rezarta ^a,c   Wilbur, W John ^c   O'Leary, Dianne P ^a,b   Przytycka, Teresa M ^c  

^a University of Maryland ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DNA FOOTPRINTING; PEPTIDE MAPPING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STRUCTURAL FOOTPRINTING; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL MODEL; EVALUATION; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; STATISTICS; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY;

DATABASES, PROTEIN; MODELS, CHEMICAL; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY, PROTEIN;

EID: 36348947870     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726807     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6807-7-53     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Secondary structure spatial conformation footprint: a novel method for fast protein structure comparison and classification. E Zotenko D O'Leary T Przytycka, BMC Struct Biol 2006 6 12 16762072 10.1186/1472-6807-6-12
2. Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. L Holm C Sander, J Mol Biol 1993 233 123 138 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1489 8377180
3. Automatic classification of protein structure by using Gauss integrals. P Rogen B Fain, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003 100 119 124 12506205 10.1073/pnas.2636460100
4. A simple topological representation of protein structure: implications for new, fast, and robust structural classification. D Bostick M Shen I Vaisman, Proteins 2004 56 3 487 501 10.1002/prot.20146 15229882
5. Local feature frequency profile: a method to measure structural similarity in proteins. I Choi J Kwon S Kim, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004 101 3797 3802 14985506 10.1073/pnas.0308656100
6. Protein fold similarity estimated by a probabilistic approach based on C[alpha]-C[alpha] distance comparison. O Carugo S Pongor, J Mol Biol 2002 315 887 898 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5250 11812155
7. Efficient recognition of folds in protein 3D structures by the improved PRIDE algorithm. Z Gáspári K Vlahovicek S Pongor, Bioinformatics 2005 21 15 3322 3323 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti513 15914542
8. A new family of protein shape descriptors. P Rogen H Bohr, Mathematical Biosciences 2003 182 167 181 10.1016/S0025-5564(02)00216-X 12591623
9. The writhing number of a space curve. F Fuller, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 1971 68 815 819 10.1073/pnas.68.4.815
10. CATH - A hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. C Orengo A Michie S Jones D Jones M Swindells J Thornton, Structure 1997 5 1093 1108 10.1016/S0969-2126(97)00260-8 9309224
11. Structural diversity of domain superfamilies in the CATH database. G Reeves T Dallman O Redfern A Akpor C Orengo, Journal of Molecular Biology 2006 360 3 725 741 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.05.035 16780872
12. Quantifying the similarities within fold space. A Harrison F Pearl R Mott J Thornton C Orengo, Journal of Molecular Biology 2002 323 5 909 926 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00992-0 12417203
13. Connecting the protein structure universe by using sparse recurring fragments. I Friedberg A Godzik, Structure 2005 13 8 1213 1224 10.1016/j.str.2005.05.009 16084393
14. ROC and confusion analysis of structure comparison methods identify the main causes of divergence from manual protein classification. V Sam C Tai J Garnier J Gibrat B Lee P Munson, BMC Bioinformatics 2006 7 206 16613604 10.1186/1471-2105-7-206
15. Use of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to evaluate sequence matching. M Gribskov NL Robinson, Comput Chem 1996 20 1 25 33 10.1016/S0097-8485(96)80004-0 16718863
16. PAS domains: internal sensors of oxygen, redox potential, and light. BL Taylor IB Zhulin, Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 1999 63 2 479 506 10357859
17. Conservation and specialization in PAS domain dynamics. A Pandini L Bonati, Protein Eng Des Sel 2005 18 3 127 137 10.1093/protein/gzi017 15820977
18. N Cristianini J Shawe-Taylor, An introduction to Support Vector Machines and other kernel-based learning methods Cambridge University Press 2000
19. D Sheskin, Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures Chapman and Hall CRC fourth 2007
20. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. A Murzin S Brenner T Hubbard C Chotia, J Mol Biol 1995 247 536 540 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0159 7723011
21. T Joachims, Advances in Kernel Methods: Support Vector Learning, chap. Making large-scale SVM learning practical The MIT Press, Bernhard Scholkopf, Christopher JC Burges, Alexander J Smola, 1998 169 184
22. The BioPython Project. http://www.biopython.org
23. The CATH Dictionary of Homologous Superfamilies (DHS): a consensus approach for identifying distant structural homologues. JE Bray AE Todd FM Pearl JM Thornton CA Orengo, Protein Engineering 2000 13 3 153 165 10.1093/protein/13.3.153 10775657
24. SSAP: sequential structure alignment program for protein structure comparison. CA Orengo WR Taylor, Methods in Enzymology 1996 266 617 635 8743709
25. Secondary structure definition by the program DSSP. W Kabsch C Sander, Biopolymers 1983 22 2577 2637 10.1002/bip.360221211 6667333
26. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System (2002). WL DeLano, http://pymol.sourceforge.net
27. The Cytoscape Website. http://www.cytoscape.org/
28. R Fenn, Geometry Springer Undergraduate Mathematics Series, Springer-Verlag 2001