Distinct functions of human cohesin-SA1 and cohesin-SA2 in double-strand break repair

Molecular and Cellular Biology

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 685-698

  Kong, Xiangduo ^a   Ball Jr , Alexander R ^a   Pham, Hoang Xuan ^a   Zeng, Weihua ^a   Chen, Hsiao Yuan ^a,c   Schmiesing, John A ^a   Kim, Jong Soo ^a,d   Berns, Michael ^b,c   Yokomori, Kyoko ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d Chungbuk National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEX; PROTEIN COHESIN SA1; PROTEIN COHESIN SA2; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA REPAIR; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; RECOMBINATION REPAIR; S PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; SOMATIC CELL;

ANIMALS; CELL CYCLE; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CELL DIVISION; CELLS, CULTURED; CHROMATIDS; CHROMOSOMAL PROTEINS, NON-HISTONE; CHROMOSOMES; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA REPAIR; HUMANS; NUCLEAR PROTEINS;

EID: 84892974472     PISSN: 02707306     EISSN: 10985549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.01503-13     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Ciccia A, Elledge SJ. 2010. The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives. Mol. Cell 40:179-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j .molcel.2010.09.019.
2. Derheimer FA, Kastan MB. 2010. Multiple roles of ATM in monitoring and maintaining DNA integrity. FEBS Lett. 584:3675-3681. http://dx.doi .org/10.1016/j.febslet.2010.05.031.
3. Shiloh Y. 2003. ATM and related protein kinases: safeguarding genome integrity. Nat. Rev. Cancer 3:155-168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrc1011.
4. Carretero M, Remeseiro S, Losada A. 2010. Cohesin ties up the genome. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 22:781-787. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2010 .07.004.
5. Nasmyth K, Haering CH. 2009. Cohesin: its roles and mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Genet. 43:525-528. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet -102108-134233.
6. Onn I, Heidinger-Pauli JM, Guacci V, Unal E, Koshland DE. 2008. Sister chromatid cohesion: a simple concept with a complex reality. Annu. Rev. Dev. Biol. 24:105-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.24 .110707.175350.
7. Peters JM, Tedeschi A, Schmitz J. 2008. The cohesin complex and its roles in chromosome biology. Genes Dev. 22:3089-3114. http://dx.doi .org/10.1101/gad.1724308.
8. Shintomi K, Hirano T. 2010. Sister chromatid resolution: a cohesin releasing network and beyond. Chromosoma 119:459-467. http://dx.doi .org/10.1007/s00412-010-0271-z.
9. Losada A, Yokochi T, Kobayashi R, Hirano T. 2000. Identification and characterization of SA/Scc3p subunits in the Xenopus and human cohesin complexes. J. Cell Biol. 150:405-416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.150.3 .405.
10. Sumara I, Vorlaufer E, Gieffers C, Peters BH, Peters J-M. 2000. Characterization of vertebrate cohesin complexes and their regulation in prophase. J. Cell Biol. 151:749-761. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.151.4.749.
11. Canudas S, Houghtaling BR, Kim JY, Dynek JN, Chang WG, Smith S. 2007. Protein requirements for sister telomere association in human cells. EMBO J. 26:4867-4878. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601903.
12. Canudas S, Smith S. 2009. Differential regulation of telomere and centromere cohesion by the Scc3 homologues SA1 and SA2, respectively, in human cells. J. Cell Biol. 187:165-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb .200903096.
13. Remeseiro S, Cuadrado A, Gómez-López G, Pisano DG, Losada A. 2012. A unique role of cohesin-SA1 in gene regulation and development. EMBO J. 31:2090-2102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2012.60.
14. Hou F, Zou H. 2005. Two human orthologues of EcoI/Ctf7 acetyltransferases are both required for proper sister-chromatid cohesion. Mol. Biol. Cell 16:3908-3918. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E04-12-1063.
15. Nishiyama T, Ladurner R, Schmitz J, Kreidl E, Schleiffer A, Bhaskara V, Bando M, Shirahige K, Hyman AA, Mechtler K, Peters JM. 2010. Sororin mediates sister chromatid cohesion by antagonizing Wapl. Cell 143:737-749. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.10.031.
16. Seitan VC, Banks P, Laval S, Majid NA, Dorsett D, Rana A, Smith J, Bateman A, Krpic S, Hostert A, Rollins RA, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Benard CY, Hekimi S, Newbury SF, Strachan T. 2006. Metazoan Scc4 homologs link sister chromatid cohesion to cell and axon migration guidance. PLoS Biol. 4:1544-9173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371 /journal.pbio.0040242.
17. Watrin E, Schleiffer A, Tanaka K, Eisenhaber F, Nasmyth K, Peters JM. 2006. Human Scc4 is required for cohesin binding to chromatin, sisterchromatid cohesion, and mitotic progression. Curr. Biol. 16:863-874. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.03.049.
18. Wu N, Yu H. 2012. The Smc complexes in DNA damage response. Cell Biosci. 2:5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-3701-2-5.
19. Kim J-S, Krasieva TB, LaMorte VJ, Taylor AMR, Yokomori K. 2002. Specific recruitment ofhumancohesin to laser-inducedDNAdamage. J. Biol. Chem. 277:45149-45153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M209123200.
20. Potts PR, Porteus MH, Yu H. 2006. Human SMC5/6 complex promotes sister chromatid homologous recombination by recruiting the SMC1/3 cohesin complex to double-strand breaks. EMBO J. 25:3377-3388. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601218.
21. Ström L, Lindroos HB, Shirahige K, Sjögren C. 2004. Postreplicative recruitment of cohesin to double-strand breaks is required for DNA repair. Mol. Cell 16:1003-1015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2004.11 .026.
22. Ü nal E, Arbel-Eden A, Sattler U, Shroff R, Lichten M, Haber JE, Koshland D. 2004. DNA damage response pathway uses histone modification to assemble a double-strand break-specific cohesin domain. Mol. Cell 16:991-1002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2004.11.027.
23. Ström L, Karlsson C, Lindroos HB, Wedahl S, Katou Y, Shirahige K, Sjögren C. 2007. Postreplicative formation of cohesion is required for repair and induced by a single DNA break. Science 317:242-245. http://dx .doi.org/10.1126/science.1140649.
24. Ü nal E, Heidinger-Pauli JM, Koshland D. 2007. DNA double-strand breaks trigger genome-wide sister-chromatid cohesion through EcoI (Ctf7). Science 317:245-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1140637.
25. Kim S-T, Xu B, Kastan MB. 2002. Involvement of the cohesin protein, Smc1, in Atm-dependent and independent responses to DNA damage. Genes Dev. 16:560-570. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.970602.
26. Watrin E, Peters JM. 2009. The cohesin complex is required for the DNA damage-induced G2/M checkpoint in mammalian cells. EMBO J. 28: 2625-2635. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2009.202.
27. Yazdi PT, Wang Y, Zhao S, Patel N, Lee EY-HP, Qin J. 2002. SMC1 is a downstream effector in the ATM/NBS1 branch of the human S-phase checkpoint. Genes Dev. 16:571-582. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.970702.
28. Luo H, Li Y, Mu JJ, Zhang J, Tonaka T, Hamamori Y, Jung SY, Wang Y, Qin J. 2008. Regulation of intra-S phase checkpoint by IR-dependent and IR-independent phosphorylation of SMC3. J. Biol. Chem. 283:0021- 9258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M802299200.
29. Sjögren C, Ström L. 2010. S-phase and DNA damage activated establishment of sister chromatid cohesion: importance for DNA repair. Exp. Cell Res. 316:1445-1453. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2009.12.018.
30. Kitagawa R, Bakkenist CJ, McKinnon PJ, Kastan MB. 2004. Phosphorylation ofSMC1is a critical downstream event in theATM-NBS1-BRCA1pathway. Genes Dev. 18:1423-1438. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1200304.
31. Jessberger R. 2009. Cohesin's dual role in the DNA damage response: repair and checkpoint activation. EMBO J. 28:2491-2493. http://dx.doi .org/10.1038/emboj.2009.217.
32. Paschal CR, Bhalla N. 2011. The cohesin complex: a platform for checkpoint activation andDNArepair? Curr. Biol. 21:R649-R650. http://dx.doi .org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.07.039.
33. Hou F, Chu CW, Kong X, Yokomori K, Zou H. 2007. The acetyltransferase activity of San stabilizes the mitotic cohesin at the centromeres in a shugoshin-independent manner. J. Cell Biol. 177:587-597. http://dx.doi .org/10.1083/jcb.200701043.
34. Gregson HC, Schmiesing JA, Kim J-S, Kobayashi T, Zhou S, Yokomori K. 2001. A potential role for human cohesin in mitotic spindle aster assembly. J. Biol. Chem. 276:47575-47582. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc .M103364200.
35. Kong X, Mohanty SK, Stephens J, Heale JT, Gomez-Godinez V, Shi LZ, Kim JS, Yokomori K, Berns MW. 2009. Comparative analysis of different laser systems to study cellular responses to DNA damage in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 37:e68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp221.
36. Kong X, Stephens J, Ball AR, Jr, Heale JT, Newkirk DA, Berns MW, Yokomori K. 2011. Condensin I recruitment to base damage-enriched DNA lesions is modulated by PARP1. PLoS One 6:e23548. http://dx.doi .org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023548.
37. Berkovich E, Monnat RJ, Jr, Kastan MB. 2008. Assessment of protein dynamics and DNA repair following generation of DNA double-strand breaks at defined genomic sites. Nat. Protoc. 3:915-922. http://dx.doi.org /10.1038/nprot.2008.54.
38. Ball J, Schmiesing ARJA, Zhou C, Gregson HC, Okada Y, Doi T, Yokomori K. 2002. Identification of a chromosome targeting domain in the human condensin subunit CNAP1/hCAP-D2/Eg7. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:5769-5781. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.22.16.5769-5781.2002.
39. Heale JT, Ball JAR, Schmiesing JA, Kim JS, Kong X, Zhou S, Hudson D, Earnshaw WC, Yokomori K. 2006. Condensin I interacts with the PARP- 1-XRCC1 complex and functions in DNA single-stranded break repair. Mol. Cell 21:837-848. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2006.01.036.
40. Kong X, Ball ARJ, Sonoda E, Feng J, Takeda S, Fukagawa T, Yen TJ, Yokomori K. 2009. Cohesin associates with spindle poles in a mitosisspecific manner and functions in spindle assembly in vertebrate cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 20:1289-1301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E08-04-0419.
41. Sonoda E, Sasaki MS, Morrison C, Yamaguchi-Iwai Y, Takata M, Takeda S. 1999. Sister chromatid exchanges are mediated by homologous recombination in vertebrate cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:5166-5169.
42. Falck J, Forment JV, Coates J, Mistrik M, Lukas J, Bartek J, Jackson SP. 2012. CDK targeting of NBS1 promotes DNA-end resection, replication restart and homologous recombination. EMBO Rep. 13:561-568. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1038/embor.2012.58.
43. Zhao S, Renthal W, Lee EY. 2002. Functional analysis of FHA and BRCT domains of NBS1 in chromatin association and DNA damage responses. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:4815-4822. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkf612.
44. Wu N, Kong X, Ji Z, Zeng W, Potts PR, Yokomori K, Yu H. 2012. Scc1 sumoylation by Mms21 promotes sister chromatid recombination through counteracting Wapl. Genes Dev. 26:1473-1485. http://dx.doi.org /10.1101/gad.193615.112.
45. Zeng W, de Greef JC, Chen Y-Y, Chien R, Kong X, Gregson HC, Winokur ST, Pyle A, Robertson KD, Schmiesing JA, Kimonis VE, Balog JFRR, Ball JAR, Lock LF, Donovan PJ, van der Maarel S, Yokomori K. 2009. Specific loss of histoneH3lysine 9 trimethylation and HP1/cohesin binding at D4Z4 repeats is associated with facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD). PLoS Genet. 5:e1000559. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000559.
46. Wendt KS, Yoshida K, Itoh T, Bando M, Koch B, Schirghuber E, Tsutsumi S, Nagae G, Ishihara K, Mishiro T, Yahata K, Imamoto F, Aburatani H, Nakao M, Imamoto N, Maeshima K, Shirahige K, Peters JM. 2008. Cohesin mediates transcriptional insulation by CCCTC-binding factor. Nature 451: 796-801. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06634.
47. Kim J-S, Krasieva TB, Kurumizaka H, Chen DJ, Taylor AM, Yokomori K. 2005. Independent and sequential recruitment of NHEJ andHRfactors to DNA damage sites in mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol. 170:341-347. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200411083.
48. Caron P, Aymard F, Iacovoni JS, Briois S, Canitrot Y, Bugler B, Massip L, Losada A, Legube G. 2012. Cohesin protects genes against H2AX Induced by DNA double-strand breaks. PLoS Genet. 8:e1002460. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002460.
49. Monnat J, Hackmann RJAFM, Cantrell MA. 1999. Generation of highly site-specific DNA double-strand breaks in human cells by the homing endonucleases I-PpoI and I-CreI. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 255: 88-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1999.0152.
50. Oka Y, Suzuki K, Yamauchi M, Mitsutake N, Yamashita S. 2011. Recruitment of the cohesin loading factor NIPBL to DNA double-strand breaks depends on MDC1, RNF168, and HP1 in human cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 411:762-767. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc .2011.07.021.
51. Tashiro S, Walter J, Shinohara A, Kamada N, Cremer T. 2000. Rad51 accumulation at sites of DNA damage and in postreplicative chromatin. J. Cell Biol. 150:283-291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.150.2.283.
52. Bermudez VP, Farina A, Higashi TL, Du F, Tappin I, Takahashi TS, Hurwitz J. 2012. In vitro loading of human cohesin on DNA by the human Scc2-Scc4 loader complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109: 9366-9371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1206840109.
53. Haering CH, Lowe J, Hochwagen A, Nasmyth K. 2002. Molecular architecture of SMC proteins and the yeast cohesin complex. Mol. Cell 9:773-788. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00515-4.
54. Tarnowski LJ, Kowalec P, Milewski M, Jurek M, Plochocka D, Fronk J, Kurlandzka A. 2012. Nuclear import and export signals of human cohesins SA1/STAG1 and SA2/STAG2 expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS One 7:e38740. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038740.
55. West SC. 2003. Molecular views of recombination proteins and their control. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 4:435-445. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038 /nrm1127.
56. Sjogren C, Nasmyth K. 2001. Sister chromatid cohesion is required for postreplicative double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr. Biol. 11:991-995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00271-8.
57. Painter RB. 1981. Radioresistant DNA synthesis: an intrinsic feature of ataxia telangiectasia. Mutat. Res.:183-190.
58. Kim BJ, Li Y, Zhang J, Xi Y, Li Y, Yang T, Jung SY, Pan X, Chen R, Li W, Wang Y, Qin J. 2010. Genome-wide reinforcement of cohesin binding at preexisting cohesin sites in response to ionizing radiation in human cells. J. Biol. Chem. 285:22784 -22792. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1074/jbc.M110.134577.
59. Solomon DA, Kim T, Diaz-Martinez LA, Fair J, Elkahloun AG, Harris BT, Toretsky JA, Rosenberg SA, Shukla N, Ladanyi M, Samuels Y, James CD, Yu H, Kim JS, Waldman T. 2011. Mutational inactivation of STAG2 causes aneuploidy in human cancer. Science 333:1039-1043. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1203619.
60. Remeseiro S, Cuadrado A, Carretero M, Martínez P, Drosopoulos WC, Cañamero M, Schildkraut CL, Blasco MA, Losada A. 2012. Cohesin-SA1 deficiency drives aneuploidy and tumourigenesis in mice due to impaired replication of telomeres. EMBO J. 31:2076-2089. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1038/emboj.2012.11.
61. Kulemzina I, Schumacher MR, Verma V, Reiter J, Metzler J, Failla AV, Lanz C, Sreedharan VT, Rätsch G, Ivanov D. 2012. Cohesin rings devoid of Scc3 and Pds5 maintain their stable association with the DNA. PLoS Genet. 8:e1002856. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002856.