Fragrance allergy and quality of life - A case-control study

Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 70, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 81-89

  Heisterberg, Maria V ^a   Menné, Torkil ^a   Johansen, Jeanne D ^a  

^a GENTOFTE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

allergic contact dermatitis; eczema; FQL index; fragrance; quality of life; questionnaire

Indexed keywords

ALDEHYDE DERIVATIVE; FRAGRANCE;

ADULT; AGED; ALLERGY; ARTICLE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CONTACT ALLERGY; CONTACT DERMATITIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; DERMATOLOGY LIFE QUALITY INDEX; FEMALE; FRAGRANCE ALLERGY; FRAGRANCE QUALITY OF LIFE INDEX; GROUPS BY AGE; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYROXYLON; MYROXYLON PEREIRAE; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; PATCH TEST; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEX DIFFERENCE; YOUNG ADULT;

ALLERGIC CONTACT DERMATITIS; ECZEMA; FQL INDEX; FRAGRANCE; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; ECZEMA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATCH TESTS; PERFUME; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SEX FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84892933596     PISSN: 01051873     EISSN: 16000536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cod.12128     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Uter W, Aberer W, Armario-Hita J C, et al. Current patch test results with the European baseline series and extensions to it from the 'European Surveillance System on Contact Allergy' network, 2007-2008. Contact Dermatitis 2012: 67: 9-19.
2. Lysdal S H, Johansen J D,. Fragrance contact allergic patients: strategies for use of cosmetic products and perceived impact on life situation. Contact Dermatitis 2009: 61: 320-324.
3. Noiesen E, Munk M D, Larsen K, Johansen J D, Agner T,. Difficulties in avoiding exposure to allergens in cosmetics. Contact Dermatitis 2007: 57: 105-109.
4. Wallenhammar L M, Nyfjall M, Lindberg M, Meding B,. Health-related quality of life and hand eczema-a comparison of two instruments, including factor analysis. J Invest Dermatol 2004: 122: 1381-1389.
5. Agner T, Andersen K E, Brandão F M, et al. Hand eczema severity and quality of life: a cross-sectional, multicentre study of hand eczema patients. Contact Dermatitis 2008: 59: 43-47.
6. Thomson K F, Wilkinson S M, Sommer S, Pollock B,. Eczema: quality of life by body site and the effect of patch testing. Br J Dermatol 2002: 146: 627-630.
7. Haeck I M, Ten B O, van Velsen S G, de Bruin-Weller M S, Bruijnzeel-Koomen C A, Knol M J,. Moderate correlation between quality of life and disease activity in adult patients with atopic dermatitis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2012: 26: 236-241.
8. Mortz C G, Andersen K E,. Fragrance mix I patch test reactions in 5006 consecutive dermatitis patients tested simultaneously with TRUE Test(R) and Trolab(R) test material. Contact Dermatitis 2010: 63: 248-253.
9. Bruze M, Andersen K E, Goossens A,. Recommendation to include fragrance mix 2 and hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (Lyral) in the European baseline patch test series. Contact Dermatitis 2008: 58: 129-133.
10. Chang A M, Chau J P, Holroyd E,. Translation of questionnaires and issues of equivalence. J Adv Nurs 1999: 29: 316-322.
11. Bracken B A, Barona A,. State of the art procedures for translating, validating and using psychoeducational tests in cross-cultural assessment. Sch Psychol Int 1991: 12: 119-132.
12. Finlay A Y, Khan G K,. Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)-a simple practical measure for routine clinical use. Clin Exp Dermatol 1994: 19: 210-216.
13. Wahlberg J E,. Identification of new allergens and non-irritant patch test preparations. Contact Dermatitis 1998: 39: 155-156.
14. Wilkinson D S, Fregert S, Magnusson B, et al. Terminology of contact dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol 1970: 50: 287-292.
15. Heisterberg M V, Andersen K E, Avnstorp C, et al. Fragrance mix II in the baseline series contributes significantly to detection of fragrance allergy. Contact Dermatitis 2010: 63: 270-276.
16. The European Commission. Consolidated version of Cosmetics Directive 76/768/EEC of 27 July 1976 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products, Cosmetic Restriction III/I, 79, 2005. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CONSLEG:1976L0768: 20100301:en:PDF (last accessed November 2012).
17. Frosch P J, Pirker C, Rastogi S C, et al. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix detects additional patients sensitive to perfumes and missed by the current fragrance mix. Contact Dermatitis 2005: 52: 207-215.
18. Larsen W G,. Perfume dermatitis. A study of 20 patients. Arch Dermatol 1977: 113: 623-626.
19. Modjtahedi B S, Modjtahedi S P, Maibach H I,. The sex of the individual as a factor in allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 2004: 50: 53-59.
20. Kwangsukstith C, Maibach H I,. Effect of age and sex on the induction and elicitation of allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1995: 33: 289-298.
21. Meding B,. Differences between the sexes with regard to work-related skin disease. Contact Dermatitis 2000: 43: 65-71.
22. Rajagopalan R, Kallal J E, Fowler J F Jr, Sherertz E F,. A retrospective evaluation of patch testing in patients diagnosed with allergic contact dermatitis. Cutis 1996: 57: 360-364.
23. Boehm D, Schmid-Ott G, Finkeldey F, John S M, Dwinger C, Werfel T, Diepgen T L, Breuer K,. Anxiety, depression and impaired health-related quality of life in patients with occupational hand eczema. Contact Dermatitis 2012: 67: 184-192.
24. Benyamini Y, Goner-Shilo D, Lazarov A,. Illness perception and quality of life in patients with contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 2012: 67: 193-199.
25. Rastogi S C, Heydorn S, Johansen J D, Basketter D A,. Fragrance chemicals in domestic and occupational products. Contact Dermatitis 2001: 45: 221-225.
26. Buckley D A,. Fragrance ingredient labelling in products on sale in the U.K. Br J Dermatol 2007: 157: 295-300.
27. Fischer L A, Menné T, Avnstorp C, Kasting G B, Johansen J D,. Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde allergy: relationship between patch test and repeated open application test thresholds. Br J Dermatol 2009: 161: 560-567.
28. Heisterberg M V, Laurberg G, Veien N K, et al. Prevalence of allergic contact dermatitis caused by hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde has not changed in Denmark. Contact Dermatitis 2012: 67: 49-51.
29. Schnuch A, Uter W, Dickel H, et al. Quantitative patch and repeated open application testing in hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde sensitive-patients. Contact Dermatitis 2009: 61: 152-162.
30. Jorgensen P H, Jensen C D, Rastogi S, Andersen K E, Johansen J D,. Experimental elicitation with hydroxyisohexyl-3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde- containing deodorants. Contact Dermatitis 2007: 56: 146-150.
31. Bonefeld C M, Nielsen M M, Rubin I M, et al. Enhanced sensitization and elicitation responses caused by mixtures of common fragrance allergens. Contact Dermatitis 2011: 65: 336-342.
32. Johansen J D, Skov L, Volund A, Andersen K, Menné T,. Allergens in combination have a synergistic effect on the elicitation response: a study of fragrance-sensitized individuals. Br J Dermatol 1998: 139: 264-270.
33. Schollhammer L, Andersen K E, Mortz C G,. The diagnostic value of patch tests with two fragrance mix I preparations for detection of clinically relevant perfume allergy. Contact Dermatitis 2012: 66: 350-352.
34. Heisterberg M V, Torkil M, Johansen J D,. Fragrance allergy and quality of life-development and validation of a disease-specific quality of life instrument. Contact Dermatitis 2014: 70: 69-80.