Fragrance mix II in the baseline series contributes significantly to detection of fragrance allergy

Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 63, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 270-276

  Heisterberg, Maria V ^a   Andersen, Klaus E ^b   Avnstorp, Christian ^c   Kristensen, Berit ^c   Kristensen, Ove ^c   Kaaber, Knud ^d   Laurberg, Grete ^e   Menné, Torkil ^a   Nielsen, Niels Henrik ^f   Sommerlund, Mette ^g   Thormann, Jens ^h   Veien, Niels K ^e   Vissing, Susanne ⁱ   Johansen, Jeanne D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b ODENSE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^c Dermatology Clinic   (Denmark)

^d Dermatology Clinic   (Denmark)

^e Dermatology Clinic Aalborg   (Denmark)

^f Dermatology Clinic   (Denmark)

^g AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^h Dermatology Clinic   (Denmark)

ⁱ Dermatology Clinic   (Denmark)

Author keywords

allergic contact dermatitis; clinical relevance of a patch test; cosmetics; FM II; fragrance; fragrance mix II

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER; FRAGRANCE; HYDROXYISOHEXYL 3 CYCLOHEXENE CARBOXALDEHYDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ALLERGY; ARTICLE; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FRAGRANCE MIX 1; FRAGRANCE MIX 2; HUMAN; INFANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MYROXYLON; PATCH TEST; PRESCHOOL CHILD; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCHOOL CHILD; SCREENING TEST;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALDEHYDES; ALLERGENS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COSMETICS; CYCLOHEXENES; DENMARK; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYROXYLON; PATCH TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78349278098     PISSN: 01051873     EISSN: 16000536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2010.01737.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Rastogi S C, Heydorn S, Johansen J D, Basketter D A., Fragrance chemicals in domestic and occupational products. Contact Dermatitis 2001: 45 (4): 221-225.
2. Johansen J D., Allergens of special interest. In: Contact Dermatitis, 4th edition, Frosch P J, Menné T, Lepottevin J-P, (eds): Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag, 2006: p. 516.
3. Rastogi S C, Menné T, Johansen J D., The composition of fine fragrances is changing. Contact Dermatitis 2003: 48 (3): 130-132.
4. Frosch P J, Pirker C, Rastogi S C, et al., Patch testing with a new fragrance mix detects additional patients sensitive to perfumes and missed by the current fragrance mix. Contact Dermatitis 2005: 52 (4): 207-215.
5. Frosch P J, Johansen J D, Menné T, et al., Further important sensitizers in patients sensitive to fragrances. Contact Dermatitis 2002: 47 (5): 279-287.
6. Wohrl S, Hemmer W, Focke M, Gotz M, Jarisch R., The significance of fragrance mix, balsam of Peru, colophony and propolis as screening tools in the detection of fragrance allergy. Br J Dermatol 2001: 145 (2): 268-273.
7. Saha M, Srinivas C R, Shenoy S D, Balachandran C, Acharya S., Footwear dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1993: 28 (5): 260-4.
8. Andersen K E, White I R, Goossens A., Allergens form the standard series. In: Contact Dermatitis, 4th edition, Frosch P J, Menné T, Lepoittevin J-P, (eds): Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, Springer-Verlag, 2006: pp. 466-467.
9. Gollhausen R, Przybilla B, Ring J., Reproducibility of patch test results: comparison of TRUE Test and Finn Chamber test results. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989: 21 (4 Pt 2): 843-846.
10. Lazarov A, David M, Abraham D, Trattner A., Comparison of reactivity to allergens using the TRUE Test and IQ chamber system. Contact Dermatitis 2007: 56 (3): 140-145.
11. Wahlberg J E, Lindberg M., Patch testing. In: Contact Dermatitis, 4th edition, Frosch P J, Menné T, Lepoittevin J-P, (eds): Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, Springer-Verlag, 2006: pp. 365-390.
12. Wilkinson D S, Fregert S, Magnusson B, et al., Terminology of contact dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol 1970: 50 (4): 287-292.
13. Buckley D A, Wakelin S H, Seed P T, Holloway D, Rycroft R J, White I R, McFadden J P., The frequency of fragrance allergy in a patch-test population over a 17-year period. Br J Dermatol 2000: 142 (2): 279-283.
14. Laguna C, De La Cuadra J, Martin-González B, Zaragoza V, Martinez-Casimiro L, Alegre V., Allergic contact dermatitis to cosmetics. Actas Dermosifiliogr 2009: 100 (1): 53-60.
15. Schnuch A, Lessmann H, Geier J, Frosch P J, Uter W., Contact allergy to fragrances: frequencies of sensitization from 1996 to 2002. Results of the IVDK. Contact Dermatitis 2004: 50 (2): 65-76.
16. Johansen J, Menné T, Christophersen J, Kaaber K, Veien N., Changes in the pattern of sensitization to common contact allergens in Denmark between 1985-86 and 1997-98, with a special view to the effect of preventive strategies. Br J Dermatol 2000: 142 (3): 490-495.
17. Nardelli A, Carbonez A, Ottoy W, Drieghe J, Goossens A., Frequency of and trends in fragrance allergy over a 15-year period. Contact Dermatitis 2008: 58 (3): 134-141.
18. Garg S, McDonagh A J, Gawkrodger D J., Age- and sex-related variations in allergic contact dermatitis to common allergens. Contact Dermatitis 2009: 61 (1): 46-47.
19. Wohrl S, Hemmer W, Focke M, Gotz M, Jarisch R., The significance of fragrance mix, balsam of Peru, colophony and propolis as screening tools in the detection of fragrance allergy. Br J Dermatol 2001: 145 (2): 268-273.
20. Larsen W, Nakayama H, Fischer T, et al., A study of new fragrance mixtures. Am J Contact Dermat 1998: 9 (4): 202-206.
21. Thyssen J P, Carlsen B C, Menné T, Johansen J D., Trends of contact allergy to fragrance mix I and Myroxylon pereirae among Danish eczema patients tested between 1985 and 2007. Contact Dermatitis 2008: 59 (4): 238-244.
22. Larsen W, Nakayama H, Fischer T, et al., A study of new fragrance mixtures. Am J Contact Dermat 1998: 9 (4): 202-206.
23. Braendstrup P, Johansen J D., Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (Lyral) is still a frequent allergen. Contact Dermatitis 2008: 59 (3): 187-188.
24. Frosch P J, Rastogi S C, Pirker C, et al., Patch testing with a new fragrance mix-reactivity to the individual constituents and chemical detection in relevant cosmetic products. Contact Dermatitis 2005: 52 (4): 216-225.
25. Militello G, James W., Lyral: a fragrance allergen. Dermatitis 2005: 16 (1): 41-44.
26. Frosch P J, Johansen J D, Menné T, et al., Lyral is an important sensitizer in patients sensitive to fragrances. Br J Dermatol 1999: 141 (6): 1076-1083.
27. Baxter K F, Wilkinson S M, Kirk S J., Hydroxymethyl pentylcyclohexene- carboxaldehyde (Lyral) as a fragrance allergen in the UK. Contact Dermatitis 2003: 48 (2): 117-118.
28. Rastogi S C, Johansen J D, Bossi R., Selected important fragrance sensitizers in perfumes-current exposures. Contact Dermatitis 2007: 56 (4): 201-204.
29. Fischer L A, Menné T, Avnstorp C, Kasting G B, Johansen J D., Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde allergy: relationship between patch test and repeated open application test thresholds. Br J Dermatol 2009: 161 (3): 560-567.
30. Jorgensen P H, Jensen C D, Rastogi S, Andersen K E, Johansen J D., Experimental elicitation with hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde- containing deodorants. Contact Dermatitis 2007: 56 (3): 146-150.
31. Schnuch A, Uter W, Dickel H, et al., Quantitative patch and repeated open application testing in hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde sensitive-patients. Contact Dermatitis 2009: 61 (3): 152-162.
32. Buckley D A., Fragrance ingredient labelling in products on sale in the U.K. Br J Dermatol 2007: 157 (2): 295-300.
33. Consolidated version of Cosmetics Directive 76/768/EEC, Cosmetic Restriction III/1,79. Available at. Accessed November 2009.
34. SCCNFP. Opinion of The Scientific Committee on Cosmetic Products and Non-Food Products intended for consumers concerning hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde. Available at:. Accessed November 2009.
35. IFRA (International Fragrance Association). Restrictions on hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde included in the 43rd Amendment, 2008. Available at. Accessed November 2009.
36. Tanaka S, Royds C, Buckley D, et al., Contact allergy to isoeugenol and its derivatives: problems with allergen substitution. Contact Dermatitis 2004: 51 (5-6): 288-291.
37. Hagvall L, Backtorp C, Svensson S, Nyman G, Borje A, Karlberg A T., Fragrance compound geraniol forms contact allergens on air exposure. Identification and quantification of oxidation products and effect on skin sensitization. Chem Res Toxicol 2007: 20 (5): 807-814.