Experimental elicitation with hydroxyisohexyl-3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde-containing deodorants

Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 56, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 146-150

  Jørgensen, Pia Haslund ^a   Jensen, Charlotte Devantier ^a,b   Rastogi, Suresh ^c   Andersen, Klaus Ejner ^a,b   Johansen, Jeanne Duus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b ODENSE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^c Department of Inland Fisheries   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Axilla; Deodorants; Fragrance allergy; Hydroxyisohexyl 3 cyclohexene carboxaldehyde; Lyral; Risk assessment; Thresholds

Indexed keywords

ALLERGEN; CYCLOHEXENE DERIVATIVE; DEODORANT AGENT; HYDROXYISOHEXYL 3 CYCLOHEXENE CARBOXALDEHYDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; ALLERGIC REACTION; ARTICLE; AXILLA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; CONTACT ALLERGY; CONTACT SENSITIZATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ECZEMA; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PATCH TEST; SIMULATION; SKIN ALLERGY;

ADULT; ALDEHYDES; ALLERGENS; CYCLOHEXANECARBOXYLIC ACIDS; CYCLOHEXENES; DEODORANTS; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATCH TESTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; THRESHOLD LIMIT VALUES;

EID: 33846905088     PISSN: 01051873     EISSN: 16000536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01028.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Frosch P J, Johansen J D, Menné T et al. Lyral is an important sensitizer in patients sensitive to fragrances. Br J Dermatol 1999: 141: 1076-1083.
2. Geier J, Brasch J, Schnuch A, Lessmann H, Pirker C, Frosch P J. Lyral® has been included in the patch test standard series in Germany. Contact Dermatitis 2002: 46: 295-297.
3. Baxter K F, Wilkinson S M, Kirk S J. Hydroxymethyl pentylcyclohexene- carboxaldehyde (Lyral®) as a fragrance allergen in UK. Contact Dermatitis 2003: 48: 117-118.
4. Frosch P J, Rastogi S C, Pirker C et al. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix - reactivity to the individual constituents and chemical detection in relevant cosmetics. Contact Dermatitis 2005: 52: 216-225.
5. An S, Lee A Y, Lee C H et al. Fragrance contact dermatitis in Korea: a joint study. Contact Dermatitis 2005: 53: 320-323.
6. Belsito D, Fowler J F, Marks J G, De Leo V A, Storrs F. Delayed-typehypersensitivity to fragrancematerials ina select North American population. Dermatitis 2006: 17: 23-28.
7. Johansen J D, Frosch P J, Svendman C, Andersen K E, Bruze M, Pirker C, Menné T. Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde - known as Lyral: quantitative aspects and risk assessment of an important fragrance allergen. Contact Dermatitis 2003: 48: 310-316.
8. Rastogi S C, Johansen J D, Frosch P J et al. Deodorants on the European market: quantitative chemical analysis of 21 fragrances. Contact Dermatitis 1998: 38: 29-35.
9. Wilkinson D S, Fregert S, Magnusson B et al. Terminology of contact dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol 1970: 50: 287-292.
10. Hannuksela M. The repeat open application test (ROAT). Contact Dermatitis 1986: 14: 221-227.
11. Bruze M, Johansen J D, Andersen K E et al. Deodorants: an experimental provocation study with cinnamic aldehyde. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003: 48: 194-200.
12. Bruze M, Johansen J D, Andersen K E et al. Deodorants: an experimental provocation study with isoeugenol. Contact dermatitis 2005: 52: 260-267.
13. Svedman C, Bruze M, Johansen J D et al. Deodorants: an experimental provocation study with hydroxycitronellal. Contact Dermatitis 2003: 48: 217-223.
14. Johansen J D, Bruze M, Andersen K E et al. The repeated open application test: suggestions for a scale of evaluation. Contact Dermatitis 1998: 39: 95-96.
15. Vølund A. Potency evaluation of contact allergens. Statistical appendix. Nordiske Seminar Og Arbejdsrapporter 1993: 570: 83-107.
16. Felter S P, Ryan C, Basketter D A, Gilnour N J, Gerberick F. Application of the risk assessment paradigm to the induction of allergic contact dermatitis. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2003: 37: 1-10.
17. Johansen J D, Andersen T F, Kjoller M, Veien N, Avnstorp C, Andersen K E, Menne T. Identification of risk products for fragrance contact allergy: a case-referent study based on patients' histories. Am J Contact Dermat 1998: 9: 80-86.
18. de Groot A C. Adverse reactions to cosmetics. Thesis, Groningen, State University of Groningen, 1988.
19. Handley J, Burrows D. Allergic contact dermatitis fromthe synthetic fragrance Lyral and acetyl cedrene in separate underarm deodorant preparations. Contact Dermatitis 1994: 31: 288-290.
20. Hendricks S A, Bousema M T, van Ginkel C J. Allergic contact dermatitis from the fragrance ingredient Lyral in underarm deodorant. Contact Dermatitis 1999: 41: 119.
21. Frosch P J, Pilz B, Andersen K E et al. Patch testing with fragrances: results of a multicentre study of the European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Group with 48 frequently used constituents of perfumes. Contact Dermatitis 1995: 33: 333-342.
22. Frosch P J, Pirker C, Rastogi S C et al. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix detects additional patients sensitive to perfumes and missed by the current fragrance mix. Contact Dermatitis 2005: 52: 207-215.
23. Menné T, Wahlberg J E, European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Risk assessment failures of chemicals commonly used in consumer products. Contact Dermatitis 2002: 46: 189-190.
24. Hansen M B, Johansen J D, Menne T. Chromium allergy: significance of both Cr(III) and Cr(VI). Contact Dermatitis 2003: 49: 206-212.
25. Fischer L A, Menne T, Johansen J D. Experimental nickel elicitation thresholds - a review focusing on occluded nickel exposure. Contact Dermatitis 2005: 52: 57-64.
26. Uter W, Balzer C, Geier J, Frosch P J, Schnuch A. Patch testing with patients' own cosmetics and toiletries - results of the IVDK*, 1998-2002. Contact Dermatitis 2005: 53: 226-233.
27. International Fragrance Association. Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde. IFRA Standards 2003. (available at www.ifraorg.org)