Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde allergy: Relationship between patch test and repeated open application test thresholds

British Journal of Dermatology

Volumn 161, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 560-567

  Fischer, L A ^a   Menne T ^a   Avnstorp, C ^b   Kasting, G B ^c   Johansen, J D ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b Skin Clinic in Rødovre   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

Author keywords

Dose response; Elicitation; HICC allergy; Patch test; Repeated exposure; ROAT

Indexed keywords

ALDEHYDE DERIVATIVE; HYDROXYISOHEXYL 3 CYCLOHEXENE CARBOXALDEHYDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG HYPERSENSITIVITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMMUNE FUNCTION TEST; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; PATCH TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPEATED FUNCTION APPLICATION TEST;

ADULT; ALDEHYDES; ALLERGENS; CYCLOHEXANES; CYCLOHEXENES; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATCH TESTS; PERFUME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 69149095593     PISSN: 00070963     EISSN: 13652133     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09256.x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Geier J, Brasch J, Schnuch A et al. Lyral has been included in the patch test standard series in Germany. Contact Dermatitis 2002 46 : 295 297.
2. Ford RA, Api AM, Letizia CS. Monographs on fragrance raw materials. Food Chem Toxicol 1992 30 (Suppl. 1S 138S.
3. Benke GM, Larsen WG. Safety evaluation of perfumed shampoos: dose/response relationships for product use testing by presensitized subjects. J Toxicol 1984 3 : 65 72.
4. de Groot AC. Contact allergy to cosmetics: causative ingredients. Contact Dermatitis 1987 17 : 26 34.
5. Handley J, Burrows D. Allergic contact dermatitis from the synthetic fragrances Lyral and acetyl cedrene in separate underarm deodorant preparations. Contact Dermatitis 1994 31 : 288 290.
6. Baxter KF, Wilkinson SM, Kirk SJ. Hydroxymethyl pentylcyclohexene- carboxaldehyde (Lyral) as a fragrance allergen in the UK. Contact Dermatitis 2003 48 : 117 118.
7. Braendstrup P, Johansen JD. Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (Lyral) is still a frequent allergen. Contact Dermatitis 2008 59 : 187 188.
8. Frosch PJ, Johansen JD, Menne T et al. Lyral is an important sensitizer in patients sensitive to fragrances. Br J Dermatol 1999 141 : 1076 1083.
9. Bruze M, Andersen KE, Goossens A. Recommendation to include fragrance mix 2 and hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (Lyral) in the European baseline patch test series. Contact Dermatitis 2008 58 : 129 133.
10. Patlewicz GY, Wright ZM, Basketter DA et al. Structure - activity relationships for selected fragrance allergens. Contact Dermatitis 2002 47 : 219 226.
11. Noiesen E, Larsen K, Agner T. Compliance in contact allergy with focus on cosmetic labelling: a qualitative research project. Contact Dermatitis 2004 51 : 189 195.
12. Noiesen E, Munk MD, Larsen K et al. Difficulties in avoiding exposure to allergens in cosmetics. Contact Dermatitis 2007 57 : 105 109.
13. Johansen JD, Frosch PJ, Svedman C et al. Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde known as Lyral: quantitative aspects and risk assessment of an important fragrance allergen. Contact Dermatitis 2003 48 : 310 316.
14. Jorgensen PH, Jensen CD, Rastogi S et al. Experimental elicitation with hydroxyisohexyl-3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde-containing deodorants. Contact Dermatitis 2007 56 : 146 150.
15. Johansen JD, Andersen KE, Svedman C et al. Chloroatranol, an extremely potent allergen hidden in perfumes: a dose-response elicitation study. Contact Dermatitis 2003 49 : 180 184.
16. Menne T. Relationship between use test and threshold patch test concentration in patients sensitive to 5-chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one and 2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one (MCI/MI). Contact Dermatitis 1991 24 : 375.
17. Andersen KE, Johansen JD, Bruze M et al. The time-dose-response relationship for elicitation of contact dermatitis in isoeugenol allergic individuals. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2001 170 : 166 171.
18. Farm G. Repeated open application tests (ROAT) in patients allergic to colophony - evaluated visually and with bioengineering techniques. Acta Derm Venereol 1998 78 : 130 135.
19. Svedman C, Bruze M, Johansen JD et al. Deodorants: an experimental provocation study with hydroxycitronellal. Contact Dermatitis 2003 48 : 217 223. (Pubitemid 36776027)
20. Johansen JD, Andersen KE, Rastogi SC et al. Threshold responses in cinnamic-aldehyde-sensitive subjects: results and methodological aspects. Contact Dermatitis 1996 34 : 165 171.
21. Schnuch A, Kelterer D, Bauer A et al. Quantitative patch and repeated open application testing in methyldibromo glutaronitrile-sensitive patients. Contact Dermatitis 2005 52 : 197 206.
22. Liden C, Bruze M, Menne T. Metals. In : Contact Dermatitis (Frosch P, Menne T, Lepoittevin JP, eds 4 edn. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York : Springer, 2006 537 568.
23. European Parliament and Council Directive 94/27/EC of 30 June 1994 amending for the 12th time Directive 76/769/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations; 1994.
24. Commission Directive 2004/96/EC of 27 September 2004 amending Council Directive 76/769/EEC as regards restrictions on the marketing and use of nickel for piercing post assemblies for the purpose of adapting its Annex I to technical progress; 2004.
25. Jensen CS, Lisby S, Baadsgaard O et al. Decrease in nickel sensitization in a Danish schoolgirl population with ears pierced after implementation of a nickel-exposure regulation. Br J Dermatol 2002 146 : 636 642.
26. Johansen J, Menne T, Christophersen J et al. Changes in the pattern of sensitization to common contact allergens in Denmark between 1985-86 and 1997-98, with a special view to the effect of preventive strategies. Br J Dermatol 2000 142 : 490 495.
27. Scientific Committee on Cosmetic Products and Non-Food Products Intended for Consumers. Opinion Concerning Methyldibromo Glutaronitrile. Colipa no. P77. Adopted by the SCCNFP during the 20th plenary meeting of 4 June 2002. 4/6/2002.
28. Scientific Committee on Consumer Products. Opinion on Methyldibromo Glutaronitrile. Colipa no. P77. Adopted by the SCCP 15 March 2005/20 June 2006. 15/3/2005.
29. Johansen JD, Veien N, Laurberg G et al. Decreasing trends in methyldibromo glutaronitrile contact allergy - following regulatory intervention. Contact Dermatitis 2008 59 : 48 51.
30. Fischer LA, Johansen JD, Menne T. Nickel allergy: relationship between patch test and repeated open application test thresholds. Br J Dermatol 2007 157 : 723 729.
31. Fischer LA, Johansen JD, Menne T. Methyldibromo glutaronitrile allergy: relationship between patch test and repeated open application test thresholds. Br J Dermatol 2008 159 : 1138 1143.
32. Hannuksela M, Salo H. The repeated open application test (ROAT). Contact Dermatitis 1986 14 : 221 227.
33. Kasting GB, Saiyasombati P. A physico-chemical properties based model for estimating evaporation and absorption rates of perfumes from skin. Int J Cosmet Sci 2001 23 : 49 58.
34. Wahlberg JE, Lindberg M. Patch testing. In : Contact Dermatitis (Frosch P, Menne T, Lepoittevin JP, eds 4 edn. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York : Springer, 2006 365 390.
35. Hindsén M, Bruze M. The significance of previous contact dermatitis for elicitation of contact allergy to nickel. Acta Derm Venereol 1998 78 : 367 370.
36. Johansen JD, Bruze M, Andersen KE et al. The repeated open application test: suggestions for a scale of evaluation. Contact Dermatitis 1998 39 : 95 6.
37. Lyman W, Reehl W, Rosenblatt D. Handbook of Chemical Property Estimation Methods: Environmental Behavior of Organic Compounds. Washington, DC : American Chemical Society, 1990.
38. Jain N, Yalkowsky SH. Estimation of the aqueous solubility. I. Application to organic nonelectrolytes. J Pharm Sci 2001 90 : 234 252. (Pubitemid 32158051)
39. Johansen JD, Rastogi SC, Bruze M et al. Deodorants: a clinical provocation study in fragrance-sensitive individuals. Contact Dermatitis 1998 39 : 161 165.
40. Magnusson B, Hersle K. Patch test methods. II. Regional variations of patch test responses. Acta Derm Venereol 1965 45 : 257 261.
41. Hextall JM, Alagaratnam NJ, Glendinning AK et al. Dose-time relationships for elicitation of contact allergy to para-phenylenediamine. Contact Dermatitis 2002 47 : 96 9.
42. McFadden JP, Wakelin SH, Holloway DB et al. The effect of patch duration on the elicitation of para-phenylenediamine contact allergy. Contact Dermatitis 1998 39 : 79 81.
43. Fischer LA, Menne T, Johansen JD. Experimental nickel elicitation thresholds - a review focusing on occluded nickel exposure. Contact Dermatitis 2005 52 : 57 64.
44. Friedmann PS, Moss C, Shuster S et al. Quantitative relationships between sensitizing dose of DNCB and reactivity in normal subjects. Clin Exp Immunol 1983 53 : 709 715.
45. Gruvberger B, Andersen KE, Brandao FM et al. Repeated open application test with methyldibromo glutaronitrile, a multicentre study within the EECDRG. Contact Dermatitis 2005 52 : 19 23. (Pubitemid 40293086)
46. Basketter DA, Jefferies D, Safford BJ et al. The impact of exposure variables on the induction of skin sensitization. Contact Dermatitis 2006 55 : 178 185.
47. White JM, Basketter DA, Pease CK et al. Intermittent exposure to low-concentration paraphenylenediamine can be equivalent to single, higher-dose exposure. Contact Dermatitis 2007 56 : 262 265.
48. Jensen CD, J Ohansen JD, Menne T, Andersen KE. Methyldibromo glutaronitrile contact allergy: effect of single versus repeated daily exposure. Contact Dermatitis 2005 52 : 88 92.
49. Bhatia SP, Lalko J, Brain KR et al. In-vitro human skin penetration of the fragrance material HMPCC. Society of Toxicology 46th Annual Meeting and ToxExpo, Charlotte, NC, U.S.A., 25-29 March 2007.
50. Mowitz M, Zimerson E, Svedman C, Bruze M. Stability of fragrance test preparations applied in test chambers. Presented at the 9th Congress of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis, Estoril, Portugal, 28-31 May 2008.
51. Johansen JD, Andersen TF, Kjøller M et al. Identification of risk products for fragrance contact allergy: a case-referent study based on patients' histories. Am J Contact Dermat 1998 9 : 80 7.