Erratum: A direct method for trajectory optimization of rigid bodies through contact (The International Journal of Robotics Research (2014) 33:1 (69-81) DOI: 10.1177/0278364913506757);A direct method for trajectory optimization of rigid bodies through contact

International Journal of Robotics Research

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 69-81

  Posa, Michael ^a   Cantu, Cecilia ^a   Tedrake, Russ ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

locomotion planning; optimal control; planning with contacts; planning with impacts and friction; Trajectory optimization

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMICS; FRICTION; QUADRATIC PROGRAMMING; RIGID STRUCTURES; TRAJECTORIES;

COMPLEMENTARITY CONSTRAINT; LINEAR COMPLEMENTARITY PROBLEMS; LOCOMOTION PLANNING; MATHEMATICAL PROGRAM WITH COMPLEMENTARITY CONSTRAINTS; OPTIMAL CONTROLS; SEQUENTIAL QUADRATIC PROGRAMMING; STATE-OF-THE-ART TECHNIQUES; TRAJECTORY OPTIMIZATION;

ROBOT PROGRAMMING;

EID: 84892720625     PISSN: 02783649     EISSN: 17413176     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0278364914533878     Document Type: Erratum

References (39)

1. Acary V, Brogliato B Numerical Methods for Nonsmooth Dynamical Systems: Applications in Mechanics and Electronics. Berlin: Springer ; 2008:
2. Acary V, Brogliato B, Daniilidis A, Lemaréchal C. On the equivalence between complementarity systems, projected systems and unilateral differential inclusions. 2004 2004 ;:
3. Anitescu M. On using the elastic mode in nonlinear programming approaches to mathematical programs with complementarity constraints. SIAM Journal on Optimization. 2005 ; 15 (4). 1203-1236
4. Anitescu M, Potra F. Formulating dynamic multi-rigid-body contact problems with friction as solvable linear complementarity problems. Nonlinear Dynamics. 1997 ; 14 (3). 231-247
5. Berard S, Nguyen B, Anderson K, Trinkle J. Sources of error in a simulation of rigid parts on a vibrating rigid plate. ASME Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics. 2010 ; 5 (4). 041003-1
6. Betts JT. Survey of numerical methods for trajectory optimization. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics. 1998 ; 21 (2). 193-207
7. Betts JT Practical Methods for Optimal Control Using Nonlinear Programming (SIAM Advances in Design and Control). Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics ; 2001:
8. Brogliato B Nonsmooth Mechanics: Models, Dynamics, and Control. Springer Verlag ; 1999:
9. Byl K, Tedrake R. Approximate optimal control of the compass gait on rough terrain. Proceedings of IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA) ; 2008 Pasadena, CA ; 2008. 1258.
10. Chen C, Mangasarian O. A class of smoothing functions for nonlinear and mixed complementarity problems. Computational Optimization and Applications. 1996 ; 5 (2). 97-138
11. Collins SH, Ruina A, Tedrake R, Wisse M. Efficient bipedal robots based on passive-dynamic walkers. Science. 2005 ; 307: 1082-1085
12. Cotton S, Olaru I, Bellman M, van der Ven T, Godowski J, Pratt J. Fastrunner: A fast, efficient and robust bipedal robot. Concept and planar simulation. Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA) ; 2012 Saint Paul, MN ; 2012. 2358.
13. Dimitrov D, Sherikov A, Wieber PB. A sparse model predictive control formulation for walking motion generation. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS) ; 2011 San Francisco, CA ; 2011. 2292.
14. Erez T, Todorov E. Trajectory optimization for domains with contacts using inverse dynamics. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS) ; 2012 Algarve, Portugal ; 2012. 4914.
15. Fischer A. A special newton-type optimization method. Optimization. 1992 ; 24 (3-4). 269-284
16. Fletcher R, Leyffer S, Ralph D, Scholtes S. Local convergence of SQP methods for mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints. SIAM Journal on Optimization. 2006 ; 17 (1). 259-286
17. Fukushima M, Luo Z, Pang J. A globally convergent sequential quadratic programming algorithm for mathematical programs with linear complementarity constraints. Computational Optimization and Applications. 1998 ; 10 (1). 5-34
18. Gill PE, Murray W, Saunders MA. SNOPT: An SQP algorithm for large-scale constrained optimization. SIAM Review. 2005 ; 47 (1). 99-131
19. Hargraves CR, Paris SW. Direct trajectory optimization using nonlinear programming and collocation. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics. 1987 ; 10 (4). 338-342
20. Jacobson DH, Mayne DQ Differential Dynamic Programming. New York: American Elsevier Publishing Company ; 1970:
21. Koenig N, Howard A. Design and use paradigms for gazebo, an open-source multi-robot simulator. Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS) ; 2004 ; 2004. 2149.
22. Luo Z, Pang J, Ralph D Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press ; 1996:
23. Miller A, Christensen H. Implementation of multi-rigid-body dynamics within a robotic grasping simulator. Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA) ; 2003 Taipei ; 2003. 2262.
24. Mordatch I, Popović Z, Todorov E. Contact-invariant optimization for hand manipulation. Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics symposium on computer animation ; 2012a Lausanne, Switzerland ; 2012a. 137.
25. Mordatch I, Todorov E, Popović Z. Discovery of complex behaviors through contact-invariant optimization. ACM SIGGRAPH. 2012b ; 31 (4). 43
26. Nguyen B, Trinkle J. Modeling non-convex configuration space using linear complementarity problems. Proceedings of 2010 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA) ; 2010 Anchorage, AK ; 2010. 2316.
27. Posa M, Tedrake R. Direct trajectory optimization of rigid body dynamical systems through contact. Proceedings of the 10th workshop on the algorithmic foundations of robotics (WAFR) ; 2012 Cambridge, MA ; 2012. 527.
28. Pratt J Exploiting inherent robustness and natural dynamics in the control of bipedal walking robots. USA: Computer Science Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology ; 2000:
29. Pratt J, Pratt G. Intuitive control of a planar bipedal walking robot. Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA) ; 1998 Leuven, Belgium ; 1998. 2014.
30. Schultz G, Mombaur K. Modeling and optimal control of human-like running. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics. 2010 ; 15 ( 5 ):
31. Shkolnik A, Levashov M, Manchester IR, Tedrake R. Bounding on rough terrain with the littledog robot. The International Journal of Robotics Research. 2011 ; 30 (2). 192-215
32. Srinivasan M, Ruina A. Computer optimization of a minimal biped model discovers walking and running. Nature. 2006 ; 439: 72-75
33. Stewart D. Rigid-body dynamics with friction and impact. SIAM Review. 2000 ; 42 (1). 3-39
34. Stewart D, Trinkle J. An implicit time-stepping scheme for rigid body dynamics with inelastic collisions and coulomb friction. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering. 1996 ; 39 (15). 2673-2691
35. Tassa Y, Erez T, Todorov E. Synthesis and stabilization of complex behaviors through online trajectory optimization. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS) ; 2012 Algarve, Portugal ; 2012. 4906.
36. Tassa Y, Todorov E. Stochastic complementarity for local control of discontinuous dynamics. Proceedings of 2010 Robotics: science and systems conference (RSS) ; 2010 Zaragoza, Spain ; 2010. 169.
37. Trinkle J, Pang J, Sudarsky S, Lo G. On dynamic multi-rigid-body contact problems with coulomb friction. ZAMM - Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics. 1997 ; 77 (4). 267-279
38. Wampler K, Popović Z. Optimal gait and form for animal locomotion. Proceedings of the 36th international conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques (SIGGRAPH) ; 2009 New Orleans, LA ; 2009.
39. Westervelt ER, Grizzle JW, Chevallereau C, Choi JH, Morris B Feedback Control of Dynamic Bipedal Robot Locomotion. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press ; 2007: