Effect of guide materials developed in "adaptation and natural selection" subject on remedying grade 8 students alternative conceptions;Adaptasyon ve doǧal seçilim konusunda geliştirilen rehber materyallerin sekizinci sinif öǧrencilerinin alternatif kavramlarinin giderilmesine etkisi

Egitim ve Bilim

Volumn 38, Issue 168, 2013, Pages 215-229

  Bakirci, Hasan ^a   Çalik, Muammer ^a  

^a KARADENIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Alternative conceptions; Guide material; Natural selection

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892718892     PISSN: 13001337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Adeniyi, E. O. (1985). Misconceptions of selected ecological concepts held by Nigerian students. Journal of Biological Education, 19, 311-316.
2. Akyol, G., Sungur, S., & Tekkaya, C. (2010). The contribution of understanding of evolutionary theory and nature of science to pre-service science teachers' acceptance of evolutionary theory. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1889-1893.
3. Asghar, A., Wiles, J., & Alter, B. (2007). Discovering international perspectives on biological evolution across religions and cultures. international Journal of Diversity in Organizations, Communities and Nations, 6, 81-88.
4. Alles, D. (2001). Using evolution as the framework for teaching biology. The American Biology Teacher, 63(1), 20-24.
5. Amir, R. & Tamir, P. (1994). in depth analysis of misconceptions as a basis for developing researchbased remedial instructions: The case of photosynthesis. The American Biology Teacher, 56, 94-100.
6. Apaydin, Z. & Sürmeli, H. (2009). Undergraduate students' attitudes towards the theory of evolution. Elementary Education Online, 8(3), 820-842.
7. Asghar, A., Wiles, J. R., & Alters, B. (2007). Canadian pre-service elementary teachers' conceptions of biological evolution and evolution education. Mcgill Journal of Education, 42(2), 189-209.
8. Bishop, B. A. & Anderson, C. W. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 415-427.
9. Brem, S. K., Ranney, M. & Shindel, J. (2002). Perceived consequences of evolution: College students perceive negative personal and social impact in evolutionary theory. Science Education, 20, 1-26.
10. Brown, D. E. (1992). Using examples and analogies to remediate misconceptions in physics: Factors influencing conceptual change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(1), 17-34.
11. Brumby, M. (1984). Misconceptions about the concept of natural selection. Science Education, 68, 493-503.
12. Bybee, R.W., Taylor, A.J., Gardner, A., Scotter, P.V., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A. & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins, effectiveness and applications. Retrieved May 13, 2011 from http://www.bscs.org/pdf/bscs5eexecsummary.pdf.
13. Cahyadi, V. (2004). The effect of interactive engagement teaching on student understanding of introductory physics at the faculty of engineering, University of Surabaya, indonesia. Higher Education Research and Development, 23(4), 455-464.
14. Coll, R. K., France, B. & Taylor, I., (2005). The role of models/and analogies in science education: Implications from research. international Journal of Science Education, 27(2), 183-198.
15. Calik, M. (2013). Effect of technology-embedded scientific inquiry on senior science student teachers' self-efficacy. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education (in press).
16. Calik, M. & Ayas, A. (2005). A comparison of level of understanding of grade 8 students and science student teachers related to selected chemistry concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6), 638-667.
17. Calik, M., Ayas, A. & Coll, R.K. (2010a). investigating the effectiveness of usage of different methods embedded with four-step constructivist teaching strategy. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(1), 32-48.
18. Calik, M., KolomuC, A. & Karagölge, Z. (2010b). The effect of conceptual change pedagogy on students' conceptions of rate of reaction. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19, 422-433.
19. Calik, M., Okur, M. & Taylor, N. (2011). A comparison of different conceptual change pedagogies employed within the topic of "sound propagation". Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20, 729-742.
20. Calik, M. & Coll, R.K. (2012). investigating socioscientific issues via scientific habits of mind: development and validation of the scientific habits of mind survey (SHOMS). international Journal of Science Education, 34(12), 1909-1930.
21. Cepni, S. (2009). Arastirma ve proje Calismalarina giris. Celepler Matbaacilik 4. Baski, Trabzon.
22. Coruhlu-Senel, T., Calik, M. & Cepni, S. (2012). Effect of conceptual change pedagogies on students' alternative conceptions of electricity resistance and electricity current. Energy, Education, Science and Technology Part B Social and Educational Studies, 4(1), 141-152.
23. Dagher, Z. R. & Boujaoude, S., (2005). Students' perceptions of the nature of evolutionary theory. Science Education, 89, 378-391.
24. Demircioglu, H., Demircioglu, G. & Calik, M. (2009). investigating effectiveness of the storylines embedded within context based learning: A case for the periodic table. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 10, 241-249.
25. Dole, J. A. (2000). Readers, texts and conceptual change learning. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 16, 99-118.
26. Er Nas, S., Calik, M. & Cepni, S. (2012). Effect of different conceptual change pedagogies embedded within 5E model on grade 6 students' alternative conceptions of 'heat transfer'. Energy, Education, Science and Technology Part B Social and Educational Studies, 4(1), 177-186.
27. Fisher, K.M., & Moody, D.E. (2002). Student misconception in biology. in K.M. Fisher, J. M. Wandersee & D.E. Moody (Eds.), Mapping Biology Knowledge, pp. 55-75. New York, Boston, Dordrecht, London, Moscow: Kluwer.
28. Gallegos, L., Jerezano, M.E. & Flores, F. (1994). Preconceptions and relations used by children in the construction of food chains. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 259-272.
29. Graf, D., Tekkaya, C., KiliC, D.S. & Özcan, G. (2011). Alman ve Türk fen bilgisi ögretmen adaylarinin evrim ögretimine iliskin pedagojik alan bilgisinin, tutumlarinin ve pedagojik alan kaygilarinin arastirilmasi. 2nd international Conference on New Trends in Education and Their implications, Antalya, 418-425.
30. Greene, E. D. (1990). The logic of university students' misunderstanding of natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(9), 875-885.
31. Gregory, T. R. (2009). Understanding natural selection: Essential concepts and common misconceptions. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 2(2), 156-175.
32. Gökdere, M & Calik, M. (2010). A cross-age study of Turkish students' mental models: An "Atom" concept. Didactica Slovenica-Pedagoska Obzorja, 25(2), 185-199.
33. Guzzetti, B.J., Snyder, T.E., Glass, G.V, & Gamas, W.W. (1993). Promoting conceptual change in science: A comparative meta-analysis of interventions from reading education and science education. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 116-159.
34. Guzzetti, B. J., Williams, W. O., Skeels, S. A. & Wu, S. M. (1997). influence of text structure on learning counterintuitive physics concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 7, 701-719.
35. Guzzetti, B. J. (2000). Learning counter-intuitive science concepts: what have we learned from over a decade of research. Reading, Writing, Quarterly, 16(2), 89-95.
36. Hammer, D. (1996). More than misconception: Multiple perspectives on student knowledge and reasoning, and an appropriate role for education research. American Journal of Physics, 64(10), 1316-1325.
37. Harrison, A.G., & Treagust, D. F. (2001). Conceptual change using multiple interpretive perspectives: Two case studies in secondary school chemistry. instructional Science, 29, 45- 85.
38. HirCa, N., Calik, M. & Seven, S. (2011). 5E modeline göre gelistirilen materyallerin ögrencilerin kavramsal degisimine ve fizik dersine karsi tutumlarina etkisi: "is, güC ve enerji" ünitesi örnegi. Türk Fen Egitimi Dergisi, 8(1), 139-152.
39. Irez, S., & Özyeral Bakanay, C.D. (2011). Biyoloji ögretmen adaylarinin evrim teorisine ve bilimin dogasina bakis aCilari üzerine bir arastirma. Egitim ve Bilim, 36(162), 39-55.
40. Karatas, F. Ö., Köse, S., & Costu, B. (2003). Ögrenci yanilgilarini ve anlama düzeylerini belirlemede kullanilan iki asamali testler. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(1), 54- 69.
41. Karsli, F. & Calik, M. (2012). Can freshman science student teachers' alternative conceptions of 'electrochemical cells' be fully diminished? Asian Journal of Chemistry, 24(2), 485-491.
42. Kolomu, C A., & Calik, M. (2012). A comparison of chemistry teachers' and grade 11 students' alternative conceptions of 'Rate of Reaction'. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 11(4), 333- 34.
43. KiliC, D.S (2012). Biyoloji ögretmenlerinin evrim ögretimi niyetlerinin planlanmis davranis teorisi CerCevesinde incelenmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 43, 294-305.
44. KiliC, D.S., Soran, H., & Graf, D. (2011). Evrim ögretimini etkileyen faktörler. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 41, 255-266.
45. Kurt, S. & Akdeniz, A. R. (2002). Fizik ögretiminde enerji konusunda gelistirilen Calisma yapraklarinin uygulanmasi. V. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Egitimi Kongresi, ODTÜ, Ankara.
46. Lawson, A. E. & Thompson, L. D. (1988). Formal reasoning ability and misconceptions concerning genetics and natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(9), 733-746.
47. Marek, E. A., Cowan, C. C. & Cavallio, A. M. L. (1994). Students' misconceptions about diffusion: How can they be eliminated? The American Biology Teacher, 56, 74-77.
48. Moore, R., Mitchell, G., Bally, R., inglis, M., Day, J., & Jacobs, D. (2002). Undergraduates' understanding of evolution: Ascriptions of agency as a problem for student learning. Journal of Biological Education, 36(2), 65-71.
49. Orgill, M. & Bodner, G. (2004). What research tells us about using analogies to teach chemistry? Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 5(1), 15-32.
50. Özmen H., Ayas, A. & Costu, B. (2002). Fen bilgisi ögretmen adaylarinin maddenin tanecikli yapisi hakkindaki anlama seviyelerinin ve yanilgilarinin belirlenmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 2(2), 507-529.
51. Palmer, D. (1993). How consistently do students use their alternative conceptions? Research in Science Education, 23(1), 228-235.
52. Passmore, C. & Stewart, J. (2002). A modeling approach to teaching evolutionary biology in high schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39 (3), 185-204.
53. Rudolph, J. L. & Stewart, J. (1998). Evolution and the nature of science: On the historical discord and its implications for education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(10), 1069- 1089.
54. Sander, M. (1993). Erroneous ideas about respiration: The teacher factor. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 919-934.
55. Simpson, W.D. & Marek, E. A. (1988). Understandings and misconceptions of biology concepts held by students attending small high schools and students attending large high schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 361-374.
56. Sinatra, G. M., Southerland, S. A., McConaughy, F., & Demastes, J.W. (2003). intentions and beliefs in students understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 510-528.
57. Smith, E. L. & Anderson, C.W. (1984). Plants as a producers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21, 685- 698.
58. Smith, J. P, diSessa, A. A. & Roschelle, J. (1993). Misconception reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Science, 3(2), 115-163.
59. Storey, R. D. (1991). Textbook errors and misconceptions in biology; cell metabolism. The American Biology Teacher, 53, 339-343.
60. Taber, K.S. (2000). Chemistry lessons for universities? A review of constructivist ideas. University Chemistry Education, 4(2), 63-72.
61. Taber, K. S. (2001). The mismatch between assumed prior knowledge and the learner's conceptions: A typology of learning impediments. Educational Studies, 27(2), 159-171.
62. Tekin, S., KolomuC, A. & Ayas, A. (2004). Kavramsal degisim metinleri kullanarak Cözünürlük kavramini daha etkili ögretebilir miyim? Türk Fen Egitimi Dergisi, 1(2), 85-102.
63. Tekkaya, C., & KiliC, D. S. (2012). Biyoloji ögretmen adaylarinin evrim ögretimine iliskin pedagojik alan bilgileri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 42, 406-417.
64. Treagust, D. F., Harrison, A. G. & Venville, G. J. (1998). Teaching science effectively with analogies: An approach for pre-service and in-service teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 9(2), 85-101.
65. Trochim, W. M. K., (2001). The research methods knowledge base. Atomic Dog, Cincinnati.
66. Trowbridge, J. E. & Mintzes, J. (1988). Alternative conceptions in animal classification: A cross-age study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 547-571.
67. Webb, P. & Boltt, G. (1990). Food chain to food web: A natural progression. Journal of Biological Education, 24(3), 187-190.
68. Yildirim, A & Simsek, H. (2006). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel arastirma yöntemleri, SeCkin Yayincilik, Ankara.
69. Zukerman, J. T. (1994). Problem solvers conceptions about osmosis. The American Biology Teacher, 56, 22-25.