An assessment into pre-service biology teachers' approaches to the theory of evolution and nature of science

Egitim ve Bilim

Volumn 36, Issue 162, 2011, Pages 39-55

  Irez, Serhat ^a   Özyeral Bakanay, Çiçek Dilek ^a  

^a MARMARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Nature of science; Pre service biology teachers; The theory of evolution

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892707319     PISSN: 13001337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., Lederman, N.G., Bell, R.L., & Schwartz, R.S. (2001). Views of nature of science questionnaire (VNOS): Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Paper presented at the Annual International Conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science (AETS), Costa Mesa, CA.
2. Abell, S. K., & Bryan, L. A. (1997). Reconceptualizing the elementary science methods course using a reflection orientation. Journal ofScience Teacher Education, 8(3), 153- 166.
3. Abell, S. K. & Smith, D.C. (1994). What is science?: Pre-service elementary teachers' conceptions of the nature of science. International Journal ofScience Education, 16(A), 475-487.
4. Aikenhead, G. & Ryan, A. (1992). The Development of a new instrument: Views on science-technology-society (VOSTS). Science Education, 76, 477-491.
5. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993). Benchmarks for scientific literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Brickhouse, N., Dagher, Z., Letts, W., & Shipman, H. (2000). Diversity of students' views about evidence, theory, and the interface between science and religion in an astronomy course. Journal ofResearch in Science Teaching, 37, 340-362.
7. Chalmers, A. F. (1999). What is this thing called science? (3rd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.
8. Cobern, W. W. (1994). Belief, understanding and the teaching of evolution. Journal ofResearch in Science Teaching, 31. 583-590.
9. Dagher, Z. R., & Boujaoude, S. (1997). Scientific views and religious beliefs of college students: The case of biological evolution. Journal ofResearch in Science Teaching, 34, 429-445.
10. Dagher, Z. R., & Boujaoude, S. (1997). (2005). Student's perceptions of the nature of evolutionary theory. Science Education, 89, 378-391.
11. Demastes, S. S., Good, R. G., Sundberg, M., & Dini., M. (1992). Students' conceptions of natural selection: A replication study and more. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Boston, MA.
12. Deniz, H., Donnelly, L. A., & Yilmaz, I. (2008). Exploring the factors related to acceptance of evolutionary theory among Turkish pre-service biology teachers: Toward a more informative conceptual ecology for biological evolution. Journal ofResearch in Science Teaching, 45, 420-443.
13. Dobzhansky, T. (1973). Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 35:125-129.
14. Eichinger, D. C., Abell, S. K., & Dagher, Z. R. (1997). Developing a graduate level science education course on the nature of science. Science & Education, 6, 417- 429.
15. Hokayem, H., & Boujaoude, S. (2008) College Students' Perceptions of the Theory of Evolution, Journal ofResearch in Science Teaching, 45(4), 395-419.
16. Irez, S. (2006). Are we prepared?: An assessment of preservice science teacher educators' beliefs about nature of science. Science Education, 90(6), 1113 - 1143.
17. Kampourakis, K., & Zogza, V. (2007). Students' preconceptions about evolution: How accurate is the characterization as Lamarckian" when considering the history of evolutionary thought? Science & Education, 16(3-5), 393-422.
18. Lanier, J. E., & Little, J.W. (1986). Research on teacher education. In M. C.Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook ofresearch on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 527- 569). New York: Macmillan.
19. Lakin, S., & Wellington, J. (1994). Who will teach the 'nature of science'?: Teachers' views of science and their implications for science education. International Journal of Science Education, 16(2), 175- 190.
20. Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal ofResearch in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331-359.
21. Lederman, N. G. (1992). (1998) The state of science education: subject matter without content. Electronic Journal ofScience Education, 3(2), 1-12.
22. Lederman, N. G. (1992). (1999) Teachers' Understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(8), 916-929.
23. Lederman, N. G. (1992). (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831-880). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Lederman, N. G., & O'Malley, M. (1990). Students' perceptions of tentativeness in science: Development, use, and sources of change. Science Education, 74(2), 225- 239.
25. Lederman, N. G., & Zeidler, D. L. (1987). Science teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: Do they really influence teacher behavior? Science Education, 71(5), 721- 734.
26. Marshall, M N. (1996). Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice, 13, 522-525.
27. McComas, W. F. (1998). The principal elements of the nature of science: dispelling the myths. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The Nature of Science in Science Education: Rationales and Strategies (pp. 53-70). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
28. McComas, W.F., & Olson, J.K. (1998). The Nature of science in international science education standards documents. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The Nature of Science in Science Education: Rationales and Strategies (pp. 41-52). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
29. McComas, W. F., Clough, M. P., & Almozroa, H. (1998). The role and character of the nature of science in science education. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature ofscience in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 3 - 39). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
30. Mellado, V. (1997). Preservice teachers' classroom practice and their conceptions of the nature of science. Science & Education, 6, 331- 354.
31. Miller, J.D., Scott, E. J., & Okamoto, S. (2006). Science communication: public acceptance of evolution. Science, 313 (5788), 765-766.
32. Mueller, C. L., & Wavering, M.J. (1999). Science Interns' beliefs about the nature ofscience and teaching. Paper presented at the Annual International Conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, Austin, Texas.
33. National Research Council, (1998). Teaching about evolution and the nature ofscience. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
34. Nehm, R.H., & Schonfeld, I.S. (2007). Does increasing biology teacher knowledge of evolution and the nature of science lead to greater preference for the teaching of evolution in school? Journal ofSicence Teacher Education 18, 699-723.
35. Nehm, R.H., Kim, S.Y., & Sheppard, K. (2009). Academic preparation in biology and advocacy for teaching evolution: biology versus non-biology teachers. Science Education. 93:6, 1122-1146.
36. Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratclifle, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What Tdeas-about-Science' Should Be Taught in School Science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692-720.
37. Peker, D., Comert, G. G., & Kence, A. (2010). Three decades of anti-evolution campaign and its results: Turkish undergraduates' acceptance and understanding of the biological evolution theory. Science & Education, 19, (6-8), 739-755.
38. Rutledge, M. L., & Warden, M. A. (1999). The development and validation of the measure of acceptance of the theory of evolution instrument. School Science and Mathematics, 99, 13-18.
39. Rutledge, M. L., & Warden, M. A. (1999). (2000). Evolutionary theory, the nature of science & high school biology teachers: Critical relationships. The American Biology Teacher, 62, 23-31.
40. Settlage, J. (1994). Conceptions of natural selection: A snapshot of the sense-making process. Journal ofResearch in Science Teaching, 31, 449-457.
41. Scharmann, L.C., & Harris, W. M. (1992). Teaching evolution: Understanding and applying the nature of science. Journal ofResearch in Science Teaching, 29(4), 375-388.
42. Schwartz, R. S., & Lederman, N. G. (2002). 'It's the nature of beast': The influence of knowledge and intentions on learning and teaching nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(3), 205- 236.
43. Smith, M.U. (2010). Current status of research in teaching and learning evolution: II. Pedagogical Issues. Science & Education, 19 (6-8), 539-571.
44. Smith, M.U., & Scharmann, L. (2008). A multi-year program developing an explicit reflective pedagogy for teaching pre-service teachers the nature of science by ostention. Science & Education, 17, 219-248.
45. Somel, R.N.O., (2007). Turkiye'de biyolojik evrim egitiminin tarihsel ve sosyolojik bir de- gerlendirmesi. A.N. Bozcuk, M. Ozmen, & B. Ciplak (eds), Biyoloji Egitiminde Evrim (pp. 199-213). Inonu Universitesi Matbaasi: Malatya.
46. Somel, R.N., Somel, M., Tan, M.G., & Kence, A. (2006). Turkiye'de Evrim Kurami Uzerine Tartigma ve Ogretmenler. Cumhuriyet Bilim Teknik, 20(1018), 20-31.