No citation advantage for monograph-based collaborations?

Journal of Informetrics

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 276-283

  Thelwall, Mike ^a   Sud, Pardeep ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLVERHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Citation impact; Co authorship; Collaboration; Humanities; Monographs; Social sciences

Indexed keywords

SOCIAL SCIENCES;

CITATION IMPACT; CO-AUTHORSHIPS; COLLABORATION; HUMANITIES; MONOGRAPHS;

COMPUTER APPLICATIONS;

EID: 84892641118     PISSN: 17511577     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2013.12.008     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Abdullah A., Thelwall M. Can the impact of non-western academic books be measured? An investigation of Google books and Google scholar for Malaysia. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2014, (in press).
2. Acedo F., Barroso C., Casanueva C., Galán J. Co-authorship in management and organizational studies: An empirical and network analysis. Journal of Management Studies 2006, 43(5):957-983. 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00625.x.
3. Avkiran N.K. Scientific collaboration in finance does not lead to better quality research. Scientometrics 1997, 39(2):173-184.
4. Bordons M., Gomez I., Fernandez M.T., Zulueta M.A., Mendez A. Local, domestic and international scientific collaboration in biomedical research. Scientometrics 1996, 37(2):279-295.
5. Bornmann L., Schier H., Marx W., Daniel H. What factors determine citation counts of publications in chemistry besides their quality?. Journal of Informetrics 2012, 6(1):11-18.
6. Cronin B. Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2001, 52(7):558-569. 10.1002/asi.1097.
7. Cronin B. Collaboration in art and science: Approaches to attribution, authorship and acknowledgment. Information & Culture 2012, 47(1):18-37.
8. Cronin B., Shaw D., La Barre K. A cast of thousands: Coauthorship and subauthorship collaboration in the 20th century as manifested in the scholarly journal literature of psychology and philosophy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2003, 54(9):855-871.
9. deB Beaver D., Rosen R. Studies in scientific collaboration. Part I: The professional origins of scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics 1978, 1(1):65-84.
10. Didegah F., Thelwall M. Which factors help authors produce the highest impact research? Collaboration, journal and document properties. Journal of Informetrics 2013, 7(4):861-873.
11. Ede L., Lunsford A. Collaboration and concepts of authorship. PMLA 2001, 116(2):354-369.
12. Engels T.C.E., Ossenblok T.L.B., Spruyt E.H.J. Changing publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities, 2000-2009. Scientometrics 2012, 93(2):373-390.
13. Francescheta M., Costantini A. The effect of scholar collaboration on impact and quality of academic papers. Journal of Informetrics 2010, 4(4):540-553.
14. Frenken K., Hölzl W., de Vor F. The citation impact of research collaborations: The case of European biotechnology and applied microbiology (1988-2002). Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 2005, 22(1):9-30.
15. Gazni A., Sugimoto C.R., Didegah F. Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology 2012, 63(2):323-335.
16. Gibbons M., Limoges C., Nowotny H., Schwartzman S., Scott P., Trow M. The new production of knowledge 1994, Sage, London, UK.
17. Glänzel W. Coauthorship patterns and trends in the sciences (1980-1998): A bibliometric study with implications for database indexing and search strategies. Library Trends 2002, 50(3):461-473.
18. Gorraiz J., Purnell P.J., Glänzel W. Opportunities for and limitations of the Book Citation Index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2013, 64(7):1388-1398.
19. Green C. The third hand: Collaboration in art from conceptualism to postmodernism 2001, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.
20. Haslam N., Ban L., Kaufmann L., Loughnan S., Peters L., Whelan S., et al. What makes an article influential? Predicting impact in social and personality psychology. Scientometrics 2008, 76(1):169-185.
21. Hellqvist B. Referencing in the humanities and its implications for citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2010, 61(2):310-318.
22. Katz J.S., Hicks D. How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model. Scientometrics 1997, 40(3):451-554.
23. Katz J.S., Martin B.R. What is research collaboration?. Research Policy 1997, 26(1):1-18.
24. Kousha K., Thelwall M. Google book search: Citation analysis for social science and the humanities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2009, 60(8):1537-1549.
25. Lariviere V., Gingras Y., Archambault É. Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities. Scientometrics 2006, 68(3):519-533.
26. Leimu R., Koricheva J. Does scientific collaboration increase the impact of ecological articles?. Bioscience 2005, 55(5):438-443.
27. Levitt J., Thelwall M. Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2009, 60(3):434-442.
28. Levitt J., Thelwall M. Does the higher citation of collaborative research differ from region to region? A case study of economics. Scientometrics 2010, 85(1):171-183.
29. Leydesdorff L., Felt U. Edited volumes, monographs, and book chapters in the Book Citation Index (BCI) and Science Citation Index (SCI, SoSCI, A&HCI). Journal of Scientometric Research 2012, 1(1):28-34.
30. Linmans A.J.M. Why with bibliometrics the humanities does not need to be the weakest link: Indicators for research evaluation based on citations, library holdings, and productivity measures. Scientometrics 2010, 83(2):337-354. 10.1007/s11192-009-0088-9.
31. Ma N., Guan J.C. An exploratory study on collaboration profiles of Chinese publications in molecular biology. Scientometrics 2005, 65(3):343-355.
32. Moody J. The structure of a social science collaboration network: Disciplinary cohesion from 1963 to 1999. American Sociological Review 2004, 69:213-238.
33. Nederhof A. Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: A review. Scientometrics 2006, 66(1):81-100.
34. Ossenblok T., Verleysen F., Engels T. Patterns of co-authorship in journal articles in the social sciences and humanities (2000-2010). Proceedings of the 17th international conference on Science and Technology Indicators (STI) 2012, 640-650. Science-Metrix and OST, Montréal.
35. Pereira J.C.R., Fischer A.L., Escuder M.M.L. Driving factors of high performance in Brazilian management sciences for the 1981-1995 period. Scientometrics 2000, 49(2):307-319.
36. Persson O., Glänzel W., Danell R. Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies. Scientometrics 2004, 60(3):421-432.
37. Price D.J.d.S. Little science, big science 1963, Columbia University Press, New York.
38. Sonnenwald D.H. Scientific collaboration. Annual review of information science and technology 2007, 643-681. Information Today, Medford, NJ. 41st ed. B. Cronin (Ed.).
39. Sooryamoorthy R. Do types of collaboration change citation? Collaboration and citation patterns of South African science publications. Scientometrics 2009, 81(1):177-193.
40. Thompson J.W. The death of the scholarly monograph in the humanities? Citation patterns in literary scholarship. Libri - International Journal of Libraries and Information Services 2007, 52(3):121-131.
41. Torres-Salinas D., Robinson-Garcia N., Cabezas-Clavijo Á., Jiménez-Contreras E. Analyzing the citation characteristics of books: Edited books, book series and types of publishers in the book citation index 2013, ArXiv.Org. arxiv:1305.1483.
42. Torres-Salinas D., Rodriguez-Sánchez R., Robinson-Garcia N., Fdez-Valdivia J., García J.A. Mapping citation patterns of book chapters in the book citation index. Journal of Informetrics 2013, 7(2):412-424. 10.1016/j.joi.2013.01.004.
43. Van Raan A.F.J. The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research results. Scientometrics 1998, 42(3):423-428.
44. White H.D., Boell S.K., Yu H., Davis M., Wilson C.S., Cole F.T.H. Libcitations: A measure for comparative assessment of book publications in the humanities and social sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2009, 60(6):1083-1096.
45. Wuchty S., Jones B., Uzzi B. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 2007, 316:1036-1038.