Changing publication patterns in the Social Sciences and Humanities, 2000-2009

Scientometrics

Volumn 93, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 373-390

  Engels, Tim C E ^a,b   Ossenblok, Truyken L B ^a   Spruyt, Eric H J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^b ANTWERP MARITIME ACADEMY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Books; Flanders; Humanities; Language use; Publication types; Social Sciences

Indexed keywords

EID: 84868001497     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-012-0680-2     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Adams, J., & Testa, J. (2011). Thomson Reuters book citation index. In E. Noyons, P. Ngulube, & J. Leta (Eds.), The 13th conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics (pp. 13-18). Durban, South Africa: ISSI, Leiden University and University of Zululand.
2. Archambault, E., Vignola-Gagne, E., Cote, G., Lariviere, V., & Gingras, Y. (2006). Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases. Scientometrics, 68, 329-342.
3. Debackere, K., & Glänzel, W. (2004). Using a bibliometric approach to support research policy making: The case of the Flemish BOF-key. Scientometrics, 59, 253-276.
4. Debackere, K., & Glänzel, W. (2008). Evidence-based bibliometrics: A decade of bibliometrics-based science policy in Flanders. In J. Gorraiz & E. Schiebel (Eds.), 10th international conference on science and technology indicators (pp. 123-125). Vienna, Austria: Austrian Research Centres.
5. Engels, T. C. E., Spruyt, E. H. J., Glänzel, W., & Debackere, K. (2009). Het Vlaams Academisch Bibliografisch Bestand voor de Sociale en Humane Wetenschappen: Instrument ten dienste van een optimaal wetenschapsbeleid? Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsrecht and Onderwijsbeleid, 2008-09, 395-403.
6. Fry, J., Creaser, C., Butters, G., Craven, J., Griffiths, J., & Hartley, D. (2009). Communicating knowledge: How and why researchers publish and disseminate their findings. Supporting paper 4: Literature review. London: Research information Network.
7. Ghesquière, P., van Bendegem, J.-P., Gillis, S., Willems, D., & Cornelissen, K. (2011). Het VABB-SHW: eerste versie klaar, nu verfijnen. In K. Debackere & R. Veugelers (Eds.), Vlaams Indicatorenboek 2011 (pp. 260-264). Brussel: Expertisecentrum O& O Monitoring.
8. Hicks, D. (2004). The four literatures of social science. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research: The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of SandT systems (pp. 473-496). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
9. Hicks, D. (2012). Performance-based university research funding systems. Research Policy, 41, 251-261.
10. Hornbostel, S. (2008). Gesucht: Aussagekräftige Indikatoren und belastbare Datenkollektionen. Desiderate geisteswissenschaftlicher Evaluierung in Deutschland. In E. Lack & C. Markschies (Eds.), What the hell is quality? (pp. 55-73). Campus Verlag: Frankfurt/New York.
11. Johnston, R., Richards, K., Gandy, M., Taylor, Z., Paasi, A., Fox, R., et al. (2009). The future of research monographs: An international set of perspectives. Progress in Human Geography, 33, 101-126.
12. Kyvik, S. (2003). Changing trends in publishing behaviour among university faculty, 1980-2000. Scientometrics, 58, 35-48.
13. Luwel, M. (2000). A bibliometric profile of Flemish research in natural, life and technical sciences. Scientometrics, 47, 281-302.
14. Martin, B., Tang, P., Morgan, M., Glänzel, W., Hornbostel, S., Lauer, G., et al. (2010). Towards a bibliometric database for the social sciences and humanities-A European scoping project: A report produced for DFG, ESRC, AHRC, NWO, ANR and ESF. Sussex: Science and Technology Policy Research Unit.
15. Moed, H. F., Linmans, A. J. M., Nederhof, A., Zuccala, A., López Illescas, C., & de Moya Anegón, F. (2009). Options for a comprehensive database of research outputs in social sciences and humanities. Research report to the project board of the scoping study "Towards a bibliometric database for the social sciences and humanities". Leiden and Madrid: CWTS and CSIC.
16. Moed, H. F., Luwel, M., Houben, J. A., Spruyt, E., & van Den Berghe, H. (1998). The effects of changes in the funding structure of the Flemish universities on their research capacity, productivity and impact during the 1980's and early 1990's. Scientometrics, 43, 231-255.
17. Moed, H. F., Luwel, M., & Nederhof, J. (2002). Towards research performance in the humanities. Library trends, 50, 498-520.
18. Nederhof, A. J. (2006). Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A review. Scientometrics, 66, 81-100.
19. Nederhof, A. J., van Leeuwen, T., & van Raan, A. (2010). Highly cited non-journal publications in political science, economics and psychology: A first exploration. Scientometrics, 83, 363-374.
20. Ossenblok, T. L. B., Engels, T. C. E., & Sivertsen, G. (2012). The representation of the social sciences and humanities in the Web of Science. A comparison of publications patterns and incentive structures in Flanders and Norway (2005-2009). Manuscript under review.
21. Prpic, K. (2007). Changes of scientific knowledge production and research productivity in a transitional society. Scientometrics, 72, 487-511.
22. Schneider, P. (2009). An outline of the bibliometric indicator used for performance-based funding of research institutions in Norway. European Political Science, 8, 364-378.
23. Sivertsen, G. (2009). Publication patterns in all fields. In F. Aström, R. Danell, B. Larsen, & J. W. Schneider (Eds.), Celebrating scholarly communication studies: A Festschrift for Olle Persson at his 60th birthday (pp. 55-60). Rio de Janeiro: ISSI.
24. Sivertsen, G. (2010). A performance indicator based on complete data for the scientific publication output at research institutions. ISSI Newsletter, 6, 22-28.
25. Thompson, J. W. (2002). The death of the scholarly monograph in the humanities? Citation patterns in literary scholarship. Libri, 52, 121-136.
26. Williams, P., Stevenson, I., Nicholas, D., Watkinson, A., & Rowlands, I. (2009). The role and future of the monograph in arts and humanities research. Aslib Proceedings, 61, 67-82.