Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities

Scientometrics

Volumn 68, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 519-533

  Larivière, Vincent ^a   Gingras, Yves ^a   Archambault, Éric ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b Science Metrix   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746459721     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-006-0127-8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. AJIFERUKE, I. (2005), Interuniversity collaboration in Canada, In: INGWERSEN, P., B. LARSEN (Eds), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI), Stockholm: Karolinska University Press, pp. 527-533.
2. ARCHAMBAULT, É., VIGNOLA GAGNÉ, É. (2004), The Use of Bibliometrics in the Social Sciences and Humanities, Report presented to the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, Montreal: Science-Metrix.
3. BORGATTI, S. P. (2002), NetDraw: Graph Visualization Software. Harvard: Analytic Technologies.
4. BORGATTI, S. P., EVERETT, M. G., FREEMAN, L. C. (2002), Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard: Analytic Technologies.
5. GINGRAS, Y. (1984). La valeur d'une langue dans un champ scientifique. Recherches Sociographiques. 25 (2): 286-296.
6. GINGRAS, Y. (2002), Les formes spécifiques de l'internationalité du champ scientifique. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, No. 141-142: 31-45.
7. GLÄNZEL, W. (1995), International scientific cooperation in a changing Europe: A bibliometric analysis of co-authorship links and profiles of 5 Eastern European Countries in the Sciences and Social Sciences, 1984-1993. Science and Science of Science, 4: 24-31.
8. GLÄNZEL, W. (1996), A bibliometric approach to social sciences: National research performance in 6 selected social science areas 1990-1992. Scientometrics, 35 (3): 291-307.
9. GLÄNZEL, W., SCHOEPFLIN U. (1999), A bibliometric study of reference literature in the sciences and social sciences. Information Processing and Management, 35: 31-44.
10. GODIN, B. (1998), Measuring knowledge flows between countries: The use of scientific meeting database. Scientometrics, 42 (3): 313-323.
11. HICKS, D. (1999), The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequences. Scientometrics, 44 (2): 193-215.
12. HICKS, D. (2004), The four literatures of social science. In: MOED, H. F., GLÄNZEL, W., SCHMOCH, U. (Eds), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, pp. 476-496.
13. INGWERSEN, P. (1997), The Central International Visibility of Danish and Scandinavian Research 1988-1996: A General Overview of Science & Technology, the Humanities and Social Sciences by Online Publication Analysis. CIS Report 5.3. Centre for Informetric Studies, Royal School of Library and Information Science, Denmark.
14. LARIVIÈRE, V., ARCHAMBAULT, E., GINGRAS, Y., VIGNOLA-GAGNE, E. (2006), The place of serials in referencing practices: Comparing natural sciences and engineering with social sciences and humanities, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 51 (8): 997-1004.
15. LARIVIÈRE, V., GINGRAS, Y., ARCHAMBAULT, R. (2005), Comparative analysis of networks of collaboration of Canadian researchers in the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities, In: INGWERSEN, P., LARSEN, B. (Eds), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI), Stockholm: Karolinska University Press, pp. 565-574.
16. LARIVIÈRE, V., LEBEL, J., LEMELIN, P. (2004), Collaborative Research in the Social Sciences and Humanities: Bibliometric Analysis of Practices. Report presented to the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, Montreal: OST.
17. LINE, M. B. (1999), Social Science information - the poor relation. 65th IFLA Council and General Conference.
18. MOED, H. F. (1996), Differences in the construction of SCI-based bibliometric indicators among various producers: A first overview. Scientometrics, 35 (2): 177-191.
19. Moed, H. F., Nederhof A. J., Luwel, M. (2002), Towards performance in the humanities. Library Trends, 50: 498-520.
20. MOODY, J. (2004), The structure of a social science collaboration network: Disciplinary cohesion from 1963-1999. American Sociological Review, 69 (2): 213-239.
21. NEDERHOF, A. J., ZWAAN, R. A. (1991), Quality judgments of journals as indicators of research performance in the humanities and the social and behavioral sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42 (5): 332-340.
22. NEDERHOF, A. J., ZWAAN, R. A., DEBRUIN, R. E., DEKKER, P. J. (1989), Assessing the usefulness of bibliometric indicators for the humanities and the social and behavioral sciences: A comparative study. Scientometrics, 15 (5-6): 423-435.
23. VAN RAAN, A. F. J. (2003), The use of bibliometric analysis in research performance assessment and monitoring of interdisciplinary scientific developments. Technikfolgenahscliätzung, 12 (1): 20-29. English translation available: http://www.itas.fzk.de/tatup/031/raan03a.htm
24. STEFANIAK, B. (2001), International co-operation in science and in the social sciences as reflected in multinational papers indexed in SCI and SSCI. Scientometrics, 52 (2): 193-210.
25. WEBSTER, B. M. (1998), Polish Sociology Citation Index as an example of usage of national citation indexes in scientometric analysis of social science. Journal of Information Science, 24 (1): 19-32.
26. WINCLAWSKA, B. M. (1996), Polish Sociology Citation Index (Principles for creation and the first results). Scientometrics, 35 (3): 387-391.
27. ZITT, M., BASSECOULARD, E., OKUBO, Y. (2000), Shadows of the past in international collaboration: Collaboration profiles of the top five producers of science. Scientometrics, 47 (3): 627-657.