Scientific collaboration in finance does not lead to better quality research

Scientometrics

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 173-184

  Avkiran, N K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041124966     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02457446     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. D. J. DE S. PRICE, Little Science, Big Science, Columbia University Press, New York, 1963.
2. H. A. ZUKERMAN, R. K. MERTON, Age, aging, and age structure in science, In: The Sociology of Science, N. STORER (Ed.), The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1973.
3. R. OVER, Collaborative research and publication in psychology, American Psychologist, 37 (1982) No. 9, 996-1001.
4. J. C. SMART, A. E. BAYER, Author collaboration and impact: A note on citation rates of single and multiple authored articles, Scientometrics, 10 (1986) 297-305.
5. K. D. WHITE, L. DALGLEISH, G. ARNOLD, Authorship patterns in psychology: National and international trends, Bulletin of the Pyschonomic Society, 20 (1982) No. 4, 190-192.
6. C. SCHWESER, The economics of academic publishing, The Journal of Economic Education, 14 (1983) No. 1, 60-64.
7. D. CRASE, F. D. ROSATO, Single versus multiple authorship in professional journals, Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dancing, 63 (1992) No. 7, 28-31.
8. M. A. HARSANYI, Multiple authors, multiple problems-Bibliometrics and the study of scholarly collaboration: A literature review, Library and Information Science Research, 15 (1993) No. 4, 325-354.
9. G. P. O'NEILL, Authorship patterns in AJER: Forty years in the making, The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 41 (1995) No. 4, 474-481.
10. HARSANYI, op. cit.
11. N. PATEL, Collaboration in the professional growth of American Sociology, Social Science Information, 12 (1972) No. 6, 77-92, p. 80.
12. D. DEB BEAVER, R. ROSEN, Studies in scientific collaboration. Part I. The professional origins of scientific co-authorship, Scientometrics, 1 (1978) 65-84.
13. D. DEB BEAVER, R. ROSEN, Studies in scientific collaboration. Part II. Scientific co-authorship, research productivity and visibility in the French scientific elite, 1799-1830, Scientometrics, 1 (1979) 133-149.
14. W. O. HAGSTROM, The Scientific Community, Basic Books, New York, 1965.
15. M. MENDENHALL, K. L. HIGBEE, Psychology of the scientist: XLVIII. Recent trends in multiple authorship in psychology, Psychological Reports, 51 (1982) 1019-1022.
16. M. F. FOX, C. A. FAVER, Independence and cooperation in research: The motivations and costs of collaboration, Journal of Higher Education, 55 (1984) 347-359.
17. CRASE and ROSATO, op. cit.
18. G. M. CROW, L. LEVINE, N. NAGER, Are three heads better than one? Reflections on doing collaborative interdisciplinary research, American Educational Research Journal, 29 (1992) No. 4, 737-753.
19. L. N. GITLIN, K. J. LYONS, E. KOLODNER, A model to build collaborative research or educational teams of health professionals in gerontology, Educational Gerontology, 20 (1994) 15-36.
20. H. A. ABT, Citations to single and multiauthored papers, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 96 (1984) 746-749.
21. CROW, LEVINE and NAGER, op. cit.
22. A. J. PENNY, S. APPEL, K. HARLEY, R. K. MUIR, Collaborative research in education: Exploring an epigenetic landscape, Studies in Higher Education, 19 (1994) No. 1, 21-31.
23. GITLIN, LYONS and KOLODNER, op. cit., p. 32.
24. H. CHEN, K. J. LYNCH, A. K. HIMLER, S. E. GOODMAN, Information management in research collaboration, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 36 (1992) No. 3, 419-445.
25. FOX and FAVER, op. cit.
26. ABT, op. cit.
27. D. DEB BEAVER, Collaboration and teamwork in physics, Czechoslovak Journal of Physics B, 36 (1986) 14-18, p. 14.
28. CROW, LEVINE and NAGER, op. cit.
29. ibid.
30. CRASE and ROSATO, op. cit.
31. M. OROMANER, Collaboration and impact: The career of multi-authored publications, Social Science Information, 14 (1975) 147-155.
32. D. LINDSEY, The Scientific Publication System in Social Science, 1st ed., Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California, 1978.
33. A. E. BAYER, A bibliometric analysis of marriage and family literature, Journal of Marriage and Family, 44 (1982) 527-538.
34. SMART and BAYER, op. cit.
35. M. BRIDGSTOCX, The quality of single and multiple authored papers: An unresolved problem, Scientometrics, 21 (1991) 37-48.
36. BAYER, op. cit.
37. J. R. COLE, S. COLE, Social Stratification in Science, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1973, p. 24.
38. A. F. FURNHAM, Quantifying quality: An argument in favour of citation counts, Journal of further and Higher Education, 14 (1990) No. 2, 105-110.
39. COLE and COLE, op. cit.
40. S. M. LAWANI, Citation analysis and the quality of scientific productivity, Bioscience, 27 (1977) 26-31.
41. S. M. LAWANI, A. E. BAYER, Validity of citation criteria for assessing the influence of scientific publications: New evidence with peer assessment, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 34 (1983) No. 1, 59-66.
42. E. GARFIELD, Citation Indexing - Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1979.
43. COLE and COLE, op. cit., p. 25.
44. K. S. BORDENS, B. B. ABBOTT, Research Design and Methods: A Process Approach, Mayfield Publishing Company, Mountain View, California, 1988, p. 192.
45. W. G. ZIKMUND, Business Research Methods, 3rd ed. HBJ College Publishers, Orlando, Florida, 1991.
46. LINDSEY, op. cit.
47. BAYER, op. cit.
48. ibid.
49. CRASE and ROSATO, op. cit., p. 31.
50. BAYER, op. cit.