The death of the scholarly monograph in the humanities? Citation patterns in literary scholarship

Libri

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 121-136

  Thompson, Jennifer Wolfe ^a,b  

^a KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 52649129162     PISSN: 00242667     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/LIBR.2002.121     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Albanese, Andrew Richard. 2001. Revolution or evolution. Library Journal 126(18): 48-51. [Journal on-line]; available from Wilson, URL: http://wilsontxt.hwwilson.com/pdfhtml/01872/P1DQR/5F4.htm [viewed 5 March 2002].
2. Association of Research Libraries. 1999. "New challenges for scholarly communication in the digital era: changing roles and expectations in the academic community," Issues in Scholarly Communication. [Web page on-line]; available from URL: http://www.arl. org/scomm/ncsc/conf.html [viewed 6 March 2001].
3. Association of Research Libraries. 2000. "Principles for emerging systems of scholarly publishing," Issues in Scholarly Communication. [Web page on-line]; available from URL: http://www.arl.org/scomm/tempe. html [viewed 2 March 2001].
4. Broadus, Robert N. 1989. Use of periodicals by humanities scholars. The Serial Librarian 16(1/2): 123-131.
5. Budd, John. 1986. Characteristics of written scholarship in American literature: A citation study. Library and Information Science Research 8: 189-211.
6. Case, Mary M., ed. 1997. "Cutbacks in library materials purchasing: OSC Quick SPEC survey," Association of Research Libraries, Issues in Scholarly Communication. [Report on-line]; available from URL: http://www. arl.org/scomm/prices.html [viewed 2 March 2002].
7. Case, Mary M., ed. 1999. The specialized scholarly monograph in crisis, or, How can I get tenure if you won't publish my book?: proceedings of a conference sponsored by American Council of Learned Societies, Association of American University Presses, [and] Association of Research Libraries [in] Washington, D.C. September 11-12, 1997. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries.
8. Collier, Bonnie. 5 February 1999. Preserving the central role of the monograph. The Chronicle of Higher Education: A56.
9. Coviello, Peter. 2001. Intimate nationality: Anonymity and attachment in Whitman. American Literature 73(1): 85-120.
10. Cullars, John. 1985. Characteristics of the monographic literature of British and American literary studies. College and Research Libraries 46(1): 511-522.
11. Cullars, John. 1992. Citation characteristics of monographs in the fine arts. Library Quarterly 62(3): 325-342.
12. Cullars, John. 1998. Citation characteristics of Englishlanguage monographs in philosophy. Library & Information Science Research 20(1): 41-68.
13. Garfield, Eugene. 1980. Is information retrieval in the arts and humanities inherently different from that in science? The effect that ISI®'s Citation Index for the Arts and Humanities is expected to have on future scholarship. Library Quarterly 50(1): 40-57.
14. Guernsey, Lisa. 6 June 1997. Those who publish online fear they suffer in tenure reviews. Chronicle of Higher Education: A2. [Newspaper on-line]; available from URL: http://www.chronicle.com/che-data/ articles.dir/art-43.dir/ issue-39.dir/39a02101.htm [viewed 27 June 2000].
15. Heinzkill, Richard. 1980. Characteristics of references in selected scholarly English journals. Library Quarterly 50(3): 352-365.
16. Herubel, Jean-Pierre V.M. and Anne L. Buchanan. 1994. Citation studies in the humanities and social sciences: A selective and annotated bibliography. Collection Management 18(3-4): 89-137.
17. Hurd, Julie M., Deborah D. Blecic, and Rama Vishwanatham. 1999. Information use by molecular biologists: Implications for library collections and services. College and Research Libraries 60(1): 31-43
18. Knight Higher Education Collaborative. 2001. Information use by molecular biologists: Implications for library collections and services. Op.Cit. Policy Perspectives 10, no. 3: 1-12. [Journal on-line]; available from University of Pennsylvania Institute for Research in Higher Education, URL: http://www. irhe.upenn.edu.pp-pubs/10N3.pdf [viewed 1 March 2002].
19. Lindholm-Romantschuk, Yeva and Julian Warner. 1996. The role of monographs in scholarly communication: An empirical study of philosophy, sociology, and economics. Journal of Documentation 52(4): 389-404.
20. Magner, Denise K. 16 June 2000. Seeking a radical change in the role of publishing. The Chronicle of Higher Education: A16-A17.
21. McCain, Katherine W. 1987. Citation patterns in the history of technology. Library and Information Science Research 9: 41-59.
22. Outstanding academic books. 1996. Choice 33(5): 723-49.
23. Outstanding academic titles. 2001. Choice 39(5): 806-833.
24. Perrault, Anna H. 1995. The changing print resource base of academic libraries in the United States. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science 36(4): 295-307.
25. Perrrault, Anna H. 1983. Humanities collection management - an impressionistic/realistic/optimistic appraisal of the state of the art. Collection Management 5(3/4): 1-23.
26. Price, Leah. 2000. The anthology and the rise of the novel: From Richardson to George Eliot. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Rodriguez, Ana Patricia. 2001. Refugees of the South: Central Americans in the U. S. Latino imaginary. American Literature 73(2): 387-412.
28. Sewell, Robert G. 2001. "Library Materials Budget Survey," Association of Research Libraries, Issues in Scholarly Communication. [Report on-line]; available from URL: http://www.arl.org/scomm/lmbs2001.html [viewed 2 March 2002].
29. Stern, Madeline. 1983. Characteristics of the literature of literary scholarship. College and Research Libraries 44: 199-209.
30. Stone, Sue. 1982. Progress in documentation: Humanities scholars: Information needs and uses. Journal of Documentation 38(4): 292-313.
31. To Publish or Perish. 1998. Policy Perspectives 7, no. 4: 1-12. [Journal on-line]; available from University of Pennsylvania Institute for Research in Higher Education; URL: http://www.irhe.upenn.edu.pp-pubs/ V7N4.pdf [viewed 1 March 2002].
32. Waters, Lindsay. 2000. A modest proposal for preventing the books of the members of the MLA from being a burden to their authors, publishers, or audiences. PMLA 115(3): 315-317.
33. Weintraub, Karl J. 1980. The humanistic scholar and the library. Library Quarterly 50(1): 22-39.