From 'trust us' to participatory governance: Deliberative publics and science policy

Public Understanding of Science

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 48-52

  Burgess, Michael M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Biobank governance; biotechnology governance; ethics; health policy; public participation; public participation in policy; public understanding of science; science policy

Indexed keywords

BIOBANK; BIOTECHNOLOGY; COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION; HUMAN; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; MANAGEMENT; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC OPINION; PUBLIC POLICY; SCIENCE; TRUST;

BIOLOGICAL SPECIMEN BANKS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION; HUMANS; POLICY MAKING; PUBLIC OPINION; PUBLIC POLICY; SCIENCE; TRUST;

EID: 84892474244     PISSN: 09636625     EISSN: 13616609     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0963662512472160     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Burgess MMRegulating Next Generation Agri-Food Biotechnologies: Lessons from European, North American and Asian Experiences. Howlett MLaycock D, ed. New York: Routledge; 2012:220-236.
2. Burgess MM,O'Doherty KC,Secko DM.Biobanking in BC: Enhancing discussions of the future of personalized medicine through deliberative public engagement.Personalized Medicine. 2008;5 (3): 285-296.
3. FriedmanW (2007) Reframing 'framing'. Public Agenda Occasional Paper Series (1). Available at: ebookbrowse.com/reframing-framing-pdf-d160128199 (accessed 12 December 2012).
4. Foltz F.Five arguments for increasing public participation in making science policy.Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society. 1999;19 (2): 117-127.
5. Fung A,Wright EO,Abers RDeepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. London; New York: Verso; 2003:.
6. Gastil J,Levine PThe Deliberative Democracy Handbook: Strategies for Effective Civic Engagement in the Twenty-First Century. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2005:.
7. Goodin RE,Dryzek J.Deliberative impacts: The macro-political uptake of mini-publics.Politics and Society. 2006;34:219-244.
8. Goven J.Deploying the consensus conference in New Zealand: democracy and de- problematization. Public Understanding of Science; 2003; 2003. 423.
9. Hamlett PW.Technology theory and deliberative democracy.Science, Technology, & Human Values. 2003;28 (1): 112-140.
10. Irwin A.Constructing the scientific citizen: Science and democracy in the biosciences.Public Understanding of Science. 2001;10 (1): 1-18.
11. Jasanoff S.Science and citizenship: A new synergy.Science and Public Policy. 2004;31:90-94.
12. Longstaff H,Burgess MM.Recruiting for representation in public deliberation on the ethics of biobanks.Public Understanding of Science. 2010;19 (2): 212-224.
13. MacKenzieMKO'DohertyKC (2011) Deliberating future issues: Minipublics and salmon genomics. Journal of Public Deliberation7(1). Available at: www.publicdeliberation.net/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1150&context=jpd (accessed 12 December 2012).
14. MacLean S,Burgess MM.Stakeholder influence in public deliberation about biobanks.Public Understanding of Science. 2010;19 (4): 486-496.
15. Molster C,Maxwell S,Youngs L,Kyne G,Hope F,Dawkins H,O'Leary P.Blueprint for a deliberative public forum on biobanking policy: Were theoretical principles achievable in practice?.Health Expectations. 2011 2011;:.
16. Molster C,Maxwell S,Youngs L,Potts A,Kyne G,Hope F,Dawkins H,O'Leary P.An Australian approach to the policy translation of deliberated citizen perspectives on biobanking.Public Health Genomics. 2012;15 (2): 82-91.
17. O'Doherty KC,Burgess MM.Engaging the public on biobanks: Outcomes of the BC Biobank.Deliberation. Public Health Genomics. 2009;12 (4): 203-215.
18. O'Doherty KC,Burgess MM,Secko DM.Sequencing the salmon genome: A deliberative public engagement.Genomics, Society and Policy. 2010;6 (1): 16-33.
19. O'Doherty KC,Hawkins AK,Burgess MM.Involving citizens in the ethics of biobank research: Informing institutional policy through structured public deliberation.Social Science and Medicine. 2012 2012;75 (9):.
20. O'Doherty KC,Ibrahim T,Hawkins AK,Burgess MM,Watson PH.Managing the introduction of biobanks to potential participants: Lessons from a deliberative public forum.Biopreservation and Biobanking. 2012;10 (1): 12-21.
21. Petersen A.Biobanks' 'engagements': Engendering trust or engineering consent?.Genomics, Society and Policy. 2007;3 (1): 31-43.
22. Rowe G,Frewer LJ.A typology of public engagement mechanisms.Science, Technology, & Human Values. 2005;30 (2): 251-290.
23. Rowe G,Horlick-Jones T,Walls J,Pidgeon N.Difficulties in evaluating public engagement initiatives: Reflections on an evaluation of the UK GM nation? Public debate about transgenic crops.Public Understanding of Science. 2005;14:331-352.
24. Walmsley HL.Biobanking, public consultation, and the discursive logics of deliberation: Five lessons from British Columbia.Public Understanding of Science. 2010;19 (4): 452-468.
25. Western Australia Office of Population Health Genomics Public Health Division, Department of Health. (2010) Guidelines for Human Biobanks, Genetic Research Databases and Associated Data. Available at: www.genomics.health.wa.gov.au/publications/docs/guidelines_for_human_biobanks.pdf (accessed 12 December 2012).