An Australian approach to the policy translation of deliberated citizen perspectives on biobanking

Public Health Genomics

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 82-91

  Molster, Caron ^a   Maxwell, Susannah ^a   Youngs, Leanne ^a   Potts, Ayla ^a   Kyne, Gaenor ^a   Hope, Fiona ^a   Dawkins, Hugh ^a,b,c   O'Leary, Peter ^a,b,c,d  

^a DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH   (Australia)

^b CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Biobank; Deliberation; Policies; Public; Translation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIO RECORDING; AUSTRALIA; CONSULTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; ILLEGITIMACY; MALE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIAL ASPECT;

BIOLOGICAL SPECIMEN BANKS; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; EXPERT TESTIMONY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POLICY MAKING; PUBLIC OPINION; WESTERN AUSTRALIA;

EID: 84857064683     PISSN: 16624246     EISSN: 16628063     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000334104     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Holman CD, Bass AJ, Rosman DL, Smith MB, Semmens JB, Glasson EJ, Brook EL, Trutwein B, Rouse IL, Watson CR, de Klerk NH, Stanley FJ: A decade of data linkage in Western Australia: strategic design, applications and benefits of the WA data linkage system. Aust Health Rev 2008; 32: 766-777.
2. Brook EL, Rosman DL, Holman CD: Public good through data linkage: measuring research outputs from the Western Australian Data Linkage System. Aus N Z J Public Health 2008; 32: 19-23. (Pubitemid 351351015)
3. Murdoch University: New supercomputer to boost Australias scientific capability. 2010. http://media.murdoch.edu.au/new-supercomputer-to-boost- australia%E2%80%99sscientific-capability.
4. Office of Population Health Genomics: Guidelines for human biobanks, genetic research databases and associated data. 2010. http://www.genomics. health.wa.gov.au/ publications/docs/guidelines-for-human biobanks.pdf (accessed June 4, 2011).
5. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD): OECD guidelines on human biobanks and genetic research databases. 2010. http://www.oecd. org/dataoecd/41/47/44054609.pdf (accessed June 4, 2011).
6. ODoherty KC, Hawkins A: Structuring public engagement for effective input in policy development on human tissue banking. Public Health Genomics 2010; 13: 197-206.
7. Burgess M: Public consultation in ethics: an experiment in representative ethics. J Bioeth Inq 2004; 1: 4-13.
8. Tutton R: Banking expectations: the promises and problems of biobanks. Pers Med 2007; 4: 463-469. (Pubitemid 350303107)
9. Corrigan O: Biobanks: can they overcome controversy and deliver on their promise to unravel the origins of common diseases? Med Educ 2006; 40: 500-502. (Pubitemid 43742821)
10. Riegman PH, Dinjens WN, Oosterhuis JW: Biobanking for inderdisciplinary clinical research. Pathobiology 2007; 74: 239-244.
11. Roden D, Pulley J, Basford M, Bernard G, Clayton E, Balser J, Masys D: Development of a large-scale de-identified DNA biobank to enable personalized medicine. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2008; 84: 362-369.
12. Fernandez C, Skedgel C, Weijer C: Considerations and costs of disclosing study findings to research participants. CMAJ 2004; 170: 1417-1419. (Pubitemid 38594635)
13. Godard B, Schmidtke J, Cassiman J, Aymé S: Data storage and DNA banking for biomedical research: informed consent, confidentiality, quality issues, ownership, return of benefits. A professional perspective. Eur J Hum Genet 2003; 11(suppl 2):S88-122.
14. Otlowski M: Donor perspectives on issues associated with donation of genetic samples and information: an Australian viewpoint. J Bioethic Inq 2007; 4: 135-150.
15. Shakespeare T: Disability, genetics and global justice. Policy Soc 2006; 4: 87-95.
16. Sharp R, Foster M: Community involvement in the ethical review of genetic research: lessons from American Indian and Alaskan Native populations. Eviron Health Perspect 2002; 110(suppl 2):145-148. (Pubitemid 34436376)
17. Haddow G, Cunningham-Burley S, Bruce A, Parry S: Generation Scotland: consulting publics and specialists at an early stage in a genetic databases development. Crit Public Health 2008; 18: 139-149. (Pubitemid 351895239)
18. Lemke AA, Wolf WA, Hebert-Beirne J, Smith ME: Public and biobank participant attitudes toward genetic research participation and data sharing. Public Health Genomics 2010; 13: 1-10.
19. ODoherty K, Burgess M: Engaging the public on biobanks: outcomes of the BC biobank deliberation. Public Health Genomics 2009; 12: 203-215.
20. Hicks A, Henriksen Hellyer J, Keonig B: Involving the public in planning for the genomics revolution: an experiment in deliberative democracy. University of Minnesota Examiner 2008; 11: 1-2.
21. Nicol D, Critchley C: What benefit sharing arrangements do people want from biobanks? A survey of public opinion in Australia; in Kaye J, Stranger M (eds): Principles and Practice in Biobank Governance. Farnham, Ashgate Publishing, 2009, pp 17-30.
22. Murphy J, Scott J, Kaufman D, Geller G, Le-Roy L, Hudson K: Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research. Am J Bioeth 2008; 8: 36-43.
23. Kettis-Lindblad A, Ring L, Viberth E, Hansson MG: Perceptions of potential donors in the Swedish public towards information and consent procedures in relation to use of human tissue samples in biobanks: a population-based study. Scand J Public Health 2007; 35: 148-156. (Pubitemid 46567459)
24. Meulenkamp TM, Gevers SK, Bovenberg JA, Koppelman GH, van Hylckama Vlieg A, Smets EM: Communication of biobanks research results: what do (potential) participants want? Am J Med Genet A 2010; 152A:2482-2492.
25. Avard D, Stanton Jean M, Grégoire G, Page M: Public involvement in health genomics: the reality behind the policies. Int J Consum Stud 2010; 34: 508-524.
26. Weisbrot D: Strong public engagement and public policy: critical underpinnings for human genetic research; in Stranger M (ed): Human Biotechnology and Public Trust: Trends Perceptions and Regulation. Hobart, Centre for Law & Genetics, 2007, pp 219-236.
27. Avard D, Bucci L, Burgess M, Kaye J, Heeney C, Farmer Y, Cambon-Thomsen A: Public health genomics and public participation: points to consider. J Public Delib 2009; 5: 1-21.
28. Burgess M: Starting on the right foot: Public consultation to inform issue definition in genome policy. 2003. http://www.ethics.ubc.ca (accessed November 30, 2009).
29. Tansey J, Burgess M: Democracy, ethics and genomics: introduction to a special issue. IAJ 2006; 6: 1-8.
30. Abelson J, Forest PG, Eyles J, Smith P, Martin E, Gauvin FP: Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Soc Sci Med 2003; 57: 239-251. (Pubitemid 36582667)
31. Burgess M, ODoherty K, Secko D: Biobanking in British Columbia: enhancing discussions of the future of personalized medicine through deliberative public engagement. Pers Med 2008; 5: 285-296. (Pubitemid 351824567)
32. Gastil J, Levine P: The Deliberative Democracy Handbook: Strategies for Effective Engagement in the 21st Century. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 2005.
33. Abelson J, Forest P, Eyles J, Casebeer A, Martin E, Mackean G: Examining the role of context in the implementation of a deliberative public participation experiment: results from a Canadian comparative study. Soc Sci Med 2007; 64: 2115-2128. (Pubitemid 46582827)
34. Abelson J, Guavin FP: Assessing the impacts of public participation: concepts, evidence and policy implications: Public Involvement Network. Ottawa, Canadian Policy Research Networks, 2006.
35. Delli Carpini M, Cook F, Jacobs L: Public deliberation, discursive participation and citizen engagement: a review of the empirical literature. Annu Rev Polit Sci 2004; 7: 315-344. (Pubitemid 38920021)
36. Einsiedel E: Assessing a controversial medical technology: Canadian public consultations on xenotransplantations. Public Underst Sci 2002; 11: 315.
37. Niemeyer S, Dryzek J: The ends of deliberation: meta-consensus and inter-subjective rationality as ideal outcomes. Swiss Polit Sci Rev 2007-2008; 2: 497-526.
38. Rowe G, Frewer L: Evaluating public participation exercises: a research agenda. Sci Technol Human Values 2004; 29: 512-556.
39. Timotijevic L, Raats MM: Evaluation of two methods of deliberative participation of older people in food-policy development. Health Policy 2007; 82: 302-319. (Pubitemid 46962786)
40. Molster C, Maxwell S, Youngs L, Kyne G, Hope F, Dawkins H, OLeary P: Blueprint for a deliberative public forum on biobanking policy: Were theoretical principles achievable in practice? Health Expect 2011, E-pub ahead of print.
41. Goodin RE, Dryzek JS: Deliberative impacts: the macro-political uptake of mini-publics. Polit Soc 2006; 34: 219-244. (Pubitemid 43742315)
42. Althaus C, Bridgman P, Davis G: The Australian Policy Handbook, ed 4. Crows Nest NSW, Allen & Unwin, 2007.
43. Willison DJ, Swinton M, Schwartz L, Abelson J, Charles C, Northrup D, Cheng J, Thabane L: Alternatives to project-specific consent for access to personal information for health research: insights from a public dialogue. BMC Med Ethics 2008; 9: 18.
44. Skene L: Feeding back significant findings to participants and relatives; in Kaye J, Stranger M (eds): Principles and Practice in Biobank Governance. Farnham, Ashgate Publishing, 2009, pp 161-175.
45. Knoppers BM: Consent revisited: points to consider. Health Law Rev 2005; 13: 33-38.
46. Ravitsky V, Wilfond BS: Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants. Am J Bioeth 2006; 6: 8-17. (Pubitemid 44691474)
47. Beskow LM, Dean E: Informed consent for biorepositories: assessing prospective participants understanding and opinions. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008; 17: 1440-1451.
48. McNamara B: The trusting citizen: Participating in genetic research: Public Sociologies: lessons and trans-Tasman comparisons. Annu Conf of Australian Sociological Association. Auckland, December 2007.
49. Sheremeta L, Knoppers BM: Beyond the rhetoric: population genetics and benefitsharing; in Peter WB, Onwuekwe CB (eds): Accessing and Sharing the Benefits of the Genomics Revolution. Dordrecht, Springer Netherlands, 2007, vol 11, pp 157-182.
50. Knoppers BM, Chadwick R: Human genetic research: emerging trends in ethics. Nat Rev Genet 2005; 6: 75-79. (Pubitemid 39657899)
51. Chadwick R, Berg K: Solidarity and equity: new ethical frameworks for genetic databases. Nat Rev Genet 2001; 2: 318-321. (Pubitemid 33674780)
52. Meslin EM, Cho MK: Research ethics in the era of personalized medicine: updating sciences contract with society. Public Health Genomics 2010; 13: 378-384.
53. OLeary C: Dont bank on DNA discretion: alarm bells are ringing as ground rules are being set for the rapidly growing genetics industry. The West Australian, Sept 19, 2009, pp 32-33.
54. OLeary C: Security risk for DNA samples. The West Australian, July 12, 2010, pp 3.