Deliberating future issues: Minipublics and salmon genomics

Journal of Public Deliberation

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  MacKenzie, Michael Kenneth ^a   O'Doherty, Kieran ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

Deliberation; Democratic Theory; Future Issues; Minipublics; Public Engagement; Public Policy; Representation

Indexed keywords

EID: 80455132502     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Avard, D., Bucci, L. M., Burgess, M. M., Kaye, J., Heeney, C., Farmer, Y., et al. (2009). Public Health Genomics (PHG) and Public Participation: Points to Consider. Journal of Public Deliberation, 5 (1) Article 7, http://services.bepress.com/jpd/vol5/iss1/art7
2. Brown, M. B. (2006). Survey Article: Citizen Panels and the Concept of Representation. Journal of Political Philosophy, 14, 203-225. (Pubitemid 43572338)
3. - (2009). Science in Democracy: Expertise, Institutions, and Representation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Burgess, M. M., O'Doherty, K., & Secko, D. (2008). Biobanking in British Columbia: Discussions of the Future of Personalized Medicine Through Deliberative Public Engagement. Personalized Medicine, 5(3), 285-296. (Pubitemid 351824567)
5. Carcasson, M., & Christopher, E. (2008). The Goals & Consequences of Deliberation: Key Findings and Challenges for Deliberative Practitioners. Washington, DC: Kettering Foundation.
6. Carson, L. (2008). Creating Democratic Surplus through Citizens' Assemblies. Journal of Public Deliberation, 4(1), Article 5, http://services.bepress.com/jpd/vol5/iss1/art9
7. Castle, D. (2007). Labelling Policies for Genetically Modified Foods. In N. M. Ries et. al. (Eds.), Food, Health and Biotechnology: Consumer and Social Issues in Canada's New Food and Health Product Industries (pp. 7-13). Victoria, BC: Report from the Advanced Foods and Materials Network Centre for Studies in Religion and Society.
8. Chambers, S. (2009). Rhetoric and the Public Sphere: Has Deliberative Democracy Abandoned Mass Democracy? Political Theory, 37(3), 323-350.
9. Crosby, N. (1995). Citizens Juries: One solution for Difficult Environmental Questions. In O. Renn, T. Webler & P. Wiedemann (Eds.), Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourses. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
10. Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
11. Danielson, P. (2007). A Platform for Experiments in the Ethics of Science and Technology. In K. Ishihara & S. Majima, (Eds.), Sapporo Proceedings (pp. 30-60). Centre for Applied Ethics and Philosophy (CAEP): Hokkaido University, Sapporo.
12. Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (2009). Frequently Asked Questions-Aquaculture Retrieved October 19, 2009, from http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/ aquaculture/faq-toc-eng.htm
13. Dienel, P. C., & Renn, O. (1995). Planning Cells: A Gate to "Fractal" Mediation. In O. Renn, T. Webler & P. Wiedemann (Eds.), Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourses. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
14. Dryzek, J. (2009). The Australian Citizens' Parliament: A World First. Journal of Public Deliberation, 5(1), Article 9, http://services.bepress.com/ jpd/vol5/iss1/art9
15. Fishkin, J. S. (1991). Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform. New Haven Connecticut: Yale University Press.
16. - (1995). The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
17. Flynn, B. (2009). Planning Cells and Citizen Juries in Environmental Policy: Deliberation and Its Limits. In F. H. J. M. Coenen (Ed.), Public Participation and Better Environmental Decisions: The Promise and Limits of Participatory Processes for the Quality of Environmentally Related Decision-Making (pp. 57-72). Dordrecht: Springer.
18. Fung, A. (2003). Survey Article: Recipes for Public Spheres: Eight Institutional Design Choices and Their Consequences. Journal of Political Philosophy, 11, 338-367. (Pubitemid 37052925)
19. - (2006). Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance. Public Administration Review, 66, 66-75. (Pubitemid 44721176)
20. Gaskell, G., Allum, N. C., Bauer, M. W., & et al. (2000). Biotechnology and the European Public. Nature Biotechnology, 18(9), 935-938. (Pubitemid 32977370)
21. Goodin, R. E. (2007). Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 35(1), 40-68.
22. Goodin, R. E., & Dryzek, J. (2006). Deliberative Impacts: The Macro-Political Uptake of Mini-Publics. Politics and Society, 34, 219-244. (Pubitemid 43742315)
23. Gundersen, A. G. (1995). The Environmental Promise of Democratic Deliberation. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
24. - (2006). Public Discussion As the Exploration and Development of Contrasting Conceptual Possibilities. Parkersburg, WV: Interactivity Foundation, http://www.interactivityfoundation.org/resources-downloads/papers
25. Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. F. (2004). Why deliberative democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26. Habermas, J. (1987). The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 2 Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Cambridge: Polity Press.
27. - (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Longstaff, H., & Burgess, M. M. (2010). Recruiting for Representation in Public Deliberation on the Ethics of Biobanks. Public Understanding of Science, 19, 212-224.
29. MacKenzie, M. K., & Warren, M. E. (2010). Two Trust-Based Uses of Minipublics in Democratic Systems. Paper presented at the European Community Studies Association - Canada, 8th Biennial Conference: Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, April 29 - May 1.
30. Nabatchi, T. (2010). Addressing the Citizenship and Democratic Deficits: The Potential of Deliberative Democracy for Public Administration. American Review of Public Administration, 40(4), 376-399.
31. Neblo, M. A., Esterling, K. M., Kennedy, R. P., Lazer, D. M. J., & Sokhey, A. E. (2010). Who Wants to Deliberate - And Why? American Political Science Review, 104(3), 566-583.
32. Nep, S., & O'Doherty, K. (2009). Beyond the Labeling Debate: Public Perceptions on GM Foods and the Hypothetical Introduction of GM Salmon into the Market. Paper presented at the Fishing and Farming Iconic Species in the Genomics Era: Cod and Salmon: St Andrews, New Brunswick, Canada, May 28.
33. O'Doherty, K., & Burgess, M. M. (2009). Engaging the Public on Biobanks: Outcomes of the BC Biobank Deliberation. Public Health Genomics, 12(4), 203-215.
34. O'Doherty, K. C., Burgess, M. M., & Secko, D. M. (2010). Sequencing the salmon genome: A deliberative public engagement. Genomics, Society and Policy, 6(1), 15-32.
35. Sanders, L. M. (1997). Against Deliberation. Political Theory, 25(3), 347-376.
36. Smith, G. (2009). Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Statistics British Columbia. (2009). Population Estimates Retrieved February 18, 2009, from http://www.bcstats.gov. bc.ca/DATA/POP/pop/estspop. asp
38. Voosen, P. (2010). "Panel Advises More Aggressive FDA Analysis of Engineered Salmon" New York Times, September 21.
39. Walmsley, H. L. (2009). Mad Scientists Bend the Frame of Biobank Governance in British Columbia. Journal of Public Deliberation, 5(1), Article 6, http://services.bepress.com/jpd/vol5/iss1/art6
40. Warren, M. E. (1996). Deliberative Democracy and Authority. American Political Science Review, 90(1), 46-60.
41. - (2008). Citizen Representatives. In M. E. Warren & H. Pearse (Eds.), Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens' Assembly (pp. 50-69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. - (2009). Governance-Driven Democratization. Critical Policy Studies, 3(1), 3-13.
43. Warren, M. E. & Pearse, H. (2008). Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens' Assembly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Wynne, B. (2001). Creating Public Alienation: Expert Cultures of Risk and Ethics on GMOs. Science as Culture, 10(4), 445-481.
45. - (2006). Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science - hitting the notes, but missing the music? Community Genetics, 9(3), 211-220. (Pubitemid 43854187)