Biobanking in British Columbia: Discussions of the future of personalized medicine through deliberative public engagement

Personalized Medicine

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 285-296

  Burgess, Michael ^a   O'Doherty, Kieran ^a   Secko, David ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b Gina Cody School of Engineering and Computer Science   (Canada)

Author keywords

Biobanks; Deliberative democracy; Personalized medicine; Public engagement

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOBANKING; CANADA; CHRONIC DISEASE; COMMUNITY CARE; DISABILITY; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; POLITICAL SYSTEM; PRESCRIPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRIVACY; PUBLIC HEALTH; SOCIAL ASPECT;

EID: 45149084128     PISSN: 17410541     EISSN: 1744828X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2217/17410541.5.3.285     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Javitt GH, Hudson K: The right prescription for personalized genetic medicine. Personalized Med. 4(2), 115-118 (2007).
2. Finegold P, Mathieson K, Holmes L et al.: Is the UK public ready for genetic medicine? Personalized/Med. 5(1), 65-76 (2008).
3. Burgess MM, Tansey J: Democratic deficit and the politics of "informed and inclusive" consultation. In: Hindsight and foresight on Emerging Technologies. Einseidel E, Parker R (Eds.). UBC Press, Vancouver, BC (In press).
4. Collins F: The case for a US prospective cohort study of genes and environment. Nature 429, 475-477 (2004).
5. Arbour L, Cook D: DNA on loan: issues to consider when carrying out genetic research with aboriginal families and communities. Commun. Gen. 9, 153-160 (2006).
6. Corrigan, O: Biobanks: can they overcome their controversy and deliver on their promise to unravel the origins of common disease? Med. Educ. 40(6), 500-502 (2006).
7. Caulfield T, Ries N: Consent, privacy and confidentiality in longitudinal, population health research: The Canadian legal context. Health Law J. 12(Suppl.), 1-46 (2004).
8. Rothstein MA: Fxpanding the ethical analysis of biobanks. J Law Med Ethnics 89-101 (2005).
9. Caulfield T, Upshur R, Daar A: DNA databanks and consent: a suggested policy option involving an authorization model. BMC Med. Ethnics 4, 1 (2003).
10. Cambon-Thomsen A, Rial-Sebbag E, Knoppers BM: Trends in ethical and legal frameworks for the use of human biobanks. European Respir. J. 30, 373-382 (2007).
11. Ahmad R, Bailey J, Bornik Z et al. A web-based instrument to model social norms: NERD design and results. Integrated Assessment J. 6(2), 9-36 (2006).
12. Danielson P: The place of ethics in a unified behavioral science. Behav. Brain Sci. 30, 23-24 (2007).
13. Danielson P, Mesoudi A, Stanev R: NERD & norms: framework and experiments. Philos. Sci. (In press).
14. Burgess MM: Ethical analysis of representation in the governance of biotechnology. In: Crossing Own Genomics in the Public Arena. Einsidei E, immermans F (Eds.). University of Calgary Press, Calgary, Canada, 157-472 (2005).
15. Burgess MM, Tansey J: Complexity of public interest in ethical analysis of genomics: ethical reflections on salmon genomics/aquaculture. Integrative Assessment J. 6(2), 37-57 (2006).
16. Longstaff H, Burgess M, Lewis P: Comparing methods of ethical consultation for biotechnology related issues. Health Law Rev. 15(1), 37-38 (2006).
17. Chambers S: Deliberative democratic theory. Ann. Rev Political Sci. 6, 307-326 (2003).
18. Dryzek J: Discursive democracy: politics, policy and political science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1990).
19. Bohman JF: The coming of age of deliberative democracy. J. Polit. Philos. 6(4), 399-423 (1998).
20. Gutmann A, Thompson D (Eds): Democracy and Disagreement. Belknap Press, Cambridge, UK (1996).
21. Gastil J, Levine P (Eds): The Deliberative Democracy Handbook: Strategies For Effective Civic Engagement In The Twenty-first Century. Jossey,-Bass, San Francisco, USA (2005).
22. Niemeyer S: Deliberation in the wilderness: displacing symbolic politics. Environ. Politics 13(2), 347-337 (2004).
23. Goodin RE, Dryzek JS: Deliberative impacts: the macro-political uptake of mini-publics. Polit. Soc. 34(2), 219-244 (2006).
24. Abelson J, Forest PG, Eyles J, Smith P, Martin E, Gauvin FP: Deliberations about deliberative methods: issue in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Social Sci. Med. 53, 239-251 (2003).
25. Rowe G, Frewer LJ: A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Sci. Technol. Human Values 30(2), 251-290 (2005).
26. Brown SR: A primer on Q methodology. Operant Subjectivity 16(3/4), 91-138 (1993).