Recruiting for representation in public deliberation on the ethics of biobanks

Public Understanding of Science

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 212-224

  Longstaff, Holly ^a   Burgess, Michael M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Ethics; Participation in science policy; Public participation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CANADA; CONSUMER; ETHICS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; MALE; MEDICAL ETHICS; MIDDLE AGED; POLICY; STATISTICS;

ADULT; BRITISH COLUMBIA; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; ETHICS, MEDICAL; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PUBLIC POLICY; TISSUE BANKS;

EID: 77749283114     PISSN: 09636625     EISSN: 13616609     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0963662508097626     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Abelson, J., Forest, P.-G., Eyles, J., Smith, P., Martin, E. and Gauvin, F.-P. (2001) Deliberations about Deliberation: Issues in the Design and Evaluation of Public Consultation Processes, Research Working Paper 01-04, McMaster University Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis.
2. Avard, D., Bucci, L., Burgess, M.M., Kaye, J., Heeney, C. and Cambon-Thomsen, A. (under review)Public Health Genomics (PHG) and Public Participation: Points to Consider, Journal of Public Health Policy.
3. Baird, L. and Henderson, H. (2001) Nuu-Chah-Nulth Case History, in K.C. Glass and J.M. Kaufert (eds) Continuing the Dialogue: Genetic Research with Aboriginal Individuals and Communities, pp. 30-43. Proceedings of a workshop sponsored by the Canadian Commission for the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Health Canada, and the National Council on Ethics in Human Research, 26-7 January, Vancouver BC.
4. Bohman, J.F. (1998) The Coming of Age of Deliberative Democracy, Journal of Political Philosophy 6(4): 399-423.
5. Burgess, M. and O'Doherty, K. (2007) Deliberative Public Engagement Related to Governing Biobanks: Final Report, Electronic Working Papers Series, W. Maurice Young Centre for Applied Ethics, University of British Columbia. URL: http://gels.ethics.ubc.ca:8213/ge3ls-arch/face-to-face/working-papers.
6. Burgess, M. and Tansey, J. (forthcoming) Democratic Deficit and the Politics of 'Informed and Inclusive' Consultation, in E. Einseidel and R. Parker (eds) Hindsight and Foresight on Emerging Technologies. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.
7. Burgess, M., O'Doherty, K. and Secko, D. (2008) Biobanking in British Columbia: Discussions of the Future of Personalized Medicine through Deliberative Public Engagement, Personalized Medicine 5(3): 285-96.
8. Canadian Evaluation Society (2006) Guidelines for Ethical Conduct URL: http://www.evaluationcanada.ca/site.cgi?s=5&ss=4&_lang=an (accessed 23 November 2006).
9. Chambers, S. (2003) Deliberative Democratic Theory, Annual Review of Political Science 6: 307-26.
10. Dietrich, H. and Schibeci, R. (2003) Beyond Public Perceptions of Gene Technology: Community Participation in Public Policy in Australia, Public Understanding of Science 12: 381-401.
11. Dryzek, J. (1990) Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy and Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Einsiedel, E.F. (2002) Assessing a Controversial Medical Technology: Canadian Public Consultations on Xenotransplantation, Public Understanding of Science 11: 315-31.
13. Fishkin, J. and Laslett, P. (2003) Debating Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Blackwell.
14. Fukuyama, F. and Furger, F. (2007) Beyond Bioethics: A Proposal for Modernizing the Regulation of Human Biotechnologies. Washington, DC: Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies.
15. Fung, A. (2006) personal communication. Workshop on Deliberative Democracy and Biobanks, Vancouver, BC, 9-11 November.
16. Gastil, J. and Levine, P. (2005) The Deliberative Democracy Handbook: Strategies for Effective Civic Engagement in the Twenty-First Century. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17. Gregory, R., McDaniels, T. and Fields, D. (2001) Decision Aiding, Not Dispute Resolution: A New Perspective for Environmental Negotiation, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 20(3): 415-32.
18. Gutmann, A. and Thompson, D. (1996) Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
19. House of Lords (2000) Science and Technology-Third Report. Science and Technology Select Committee. London: HMSO.
20. Keeney, R.L. (1992) Value Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decision Making, pp. 16-22. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Keeney, R. (1994) Creativity in Decision Making with Value Focused Thinking, Sloan Management Review Summer: 33-41.
22. Keeney, R. and McDaniels, T. (1999) Identifying and Structuring Values to Guide Integrated Resource Planning at BC Gas, Operations Research 47(5): 651-62.
23. Longstaff, H., Burgess, M. and Lewis, P. (2006) Comparing Methods of Ethical Consultation for Biotechnology Related Issues, Health Law Review 15(1): 37-38.
24. Longstaff, H. and Secko, D. (under review)Media Influence on Biobank Deliberations, Journal of Public Deliberation.
25. Luskin, R.C., Fishkin, J.S. and Iyengar, S. (2006) Considered Opinions on U.S. Foreign Policy: Face-to-Face versus Online Deliberative Polling, Centre for Deliberative Democracy working paper series, Stanford University. URL: http://cdd.stanford.edu/research/.
26. McDaniels, T. (2000) Creating and Using Objectives for Ecological Risk Assessment and Management, Environmental Science and Policy 3: 299-304.
27. McDaniels, T. and Gregory, R. (2004) Learning as an Objective within Structured Decision Processes for Managing Environmental Risks, Environmental Science and Technology 38(7): 1921-6.
28. McDonald, M. (2001) Framework for Ethical Decision-Making, The W. Maurice Young Centre for Applied Ethics Website. URL: http://www.ethics.ubc.ca/people/mcdonald/decisions.htm (accessed 22 January 2007).
29. MacLean, S. and Burgess, M. (under review)In the Public Interest: Assessing Expert and Stakeholder Influence in Public Deliberation about Biobanks.
30. Niemeyer, S. (2004) Deliberation in the Wilderness: Displacing Symbolic Politics, Environmental Politics 13(2): 347-72.
31. O'Doherty, K. and Davidson, H. (2008) Subject Positions and Self-Warranting in a Deliberative Democracy Event on Biobanking, Electronic Working Papers Series, W. Maurice Young Centre for Applied Ethics, University of British Columbia. http://gels.ethics.ubc.ca.8213/ge31s-arch-working-papers.
32. Office of Science and Technology and the Wellcome Trust (2001) Science and the Public: A Review of Science Communication and Public Attitudes toward Science in Britain, Public Understanding of Science 10: 315-30.
33. Rowe, G. and Frewer, L.J. (2005) A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms, Science, Technology, and Human Values 30(2): 251-90.
34. Rowe, G., Horlick-Jones, T., Walls, J. and Pidgeon, N. (2005) Difficulties in Evaluating Public Engagement Initiatives: Reflections on an Evaluation of the UK GM Nation? Public Debate about Transgenic Crops, Public Understanding of Science 14: 331-52.
35. Sunstein, C. (2002) The Law of Group Polarization, Journal of Political Philosophy 10(2): 175-95.
36. Tansey, J. and Burgess, M. (2004) The Foundations, Applications and Ethical Dimensions of Biobanks, Electronic Working Papers Series, W. Maurice Young Centre for Applied Ethics, University of British Columbia. URL: www.ethics.ubc.ca.
37. Tymchuk, M. (2000) Bad Blood: Management and Function, Canadian Broadcasting Company, National Radio.
38. Walmsley, H. (under review)Mad Scientists Bend the 'Frame' of Biobanking Governance in BC: How Ethnographic Attention to Stories can help Deliberative Events 'Listen, Journal of Public Deliberation.