Benefits of bandwidth feedback in learning a complex gymnastic skill

Journal of Human Kinetics

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 183-193

  Sadowski, Jerzy ^a   Mastalerz, Andrzej ^a   Niznikowski, Tomasz ^a  

^a JÓZEF PI SUDSKI UNIVERSITY OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION IN WARSAW   (Poland)

Author keywords

Complex motor skill; Guidance hypothesis; Gymnastics; Knowledge of performance

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892173440     PISSN: 16405544     EISSN: 18997562     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2478/hukin-2013-0039     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Adams JA. Historical review and appraisal of research on the learning, retention, and transfer of human motor skills. Psychological Bulletin, 1987; 101: 41-74
2. Badets A, Blandin Y. Observational Learning: Effects of Bandwidth Knowledge of Results. Journal of Motor Behavior, 2005; 37: 211-216
3. Badets A, Blandin Y. Feedback schedules for motor-skill learning: The similarities and differences between physical and observational practice. Journal of Motor Behavior, 2010; 42: 257-268
4. Baudry L, Leroy D, Thouvarecq R, Choller D. Auditory concurrent feedback benefits on the circle performed in gymnastics. Journal of Sports Sciences, 2006; 24: 149-156
5. Butki BD, Hoffman SJ. Effects of reducing frequency of intrinsic knowledge of results on the learning of a motor skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 2003; 97: 569-580
6. Butler MS, Reeve TG, Fischman MG. Effects of the instructional set in the bandwidth feedback paradigm on motor skill acquisition. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1996; 67: 355-359
7. Cauraugh JH, Chen D, Radlo SJ. Effects of traditional and reversed bandwidth knowledge of results on motor learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1993; 64: 413-417
8. FIG. Code of points: Artistic gymnastics for men. Federation of International Gymnastics; 2001
9. Gentile AM. Skill acquisition: Actions, movements and neuromotor processes. In J. H. Carr and R. B. Shephard (Eds.). Movement science: Foundations for physical therapy in rehabilitation. Rockville, MD: Aspen, 93-154; 1987
10. Hicks RE. Intrahemispheric response competition between vocal and unimanual performance in normal adult human males. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1975; 89: 50-60
11. Kernodle MW, Carlton LG. Information feedback and the learning of multiple-degree-of-freedom activities. Journal of Motor Behaviour, 1992; 24: 187-196
12. Kernodle MW, Johnson R, Arnold DR. Verbal instruction for correcting errors versus such instructions plus videotape replay on learning the overhand throw. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 2001; 92: 1039-1051
13. Klein PJ, DeHaven JJ. Accuracy of three-dimensional linear and angular estimates obtained with the ariel performance analysis system. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 1995; 76: 183-189
14. Kluger AN, DeNisi A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a metaanalysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 1996; 119: 254-284
15. Kohl RM, Guadagnoli MA. The scheduling of knowledge of results. Journal of Motor Behavior,1996; 28: 233-240
16. Laguna P. Task complexity and sources of task-related information during the observational learning process. Journal of Sports Science, 2008; 26: 1097-1113
17. Lai Q, Shea CH. Bandwidth knowledge of results enhances generalized motor program learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1999; 70: 79-83
18. Lai Q, Shea CH, Wulf G, Wright DL. Optimizing generalized motor program and parameter learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,2000; 71: 10-24
19. Lee TD, Carnahan H. When to provide knowledge of results during motor learning: Scheduling effects. Human Performance, 1990; 3: 87-105
20. Lee TD, Maraj BK. Effects of bandwidth goals and bandwidth knowledge of results on motor learning. Research Quarterly for Exercises and Sport, 1994; 61: 284-290
21. Liu UD. An experimental study on the relationship between opportunity of feedback and effects of feedback in physical education instructions. Journal of Tianjin Institute of Physical Education. 2001; 16(2): 65-66
22. Magill RA. Motor Learning: Concepts and Applications. Dubuque, IA: Borow and Benchmark; 1993
23. Magill RA. Knowledge is more than we can talk about: Implicit learning in motor skill acquisition. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1998; 69: 104-110
24. Magill RA, Schoenfelder-Zoholi B. A visual model and knowledge of performances sources of information for learning a rhythmic gymnastics skill. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 1996; 27: 7-22
25. Maslovat D, Brunke KM, Chua R, Franks IM. Feedback effects on learning a novel bimanual coordination pattern: Support for the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behaviour, 2009; 41: 45-54
26. Masser LS. Critical cues help first grade students' achievement in handstand and forward rolls. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 1993; 12: 301-312
27. Mawer M. It's not what you do, it's the way that you do it! Teaching skills in physical education. British Journal of Physical Education, 1990; 21: 307-311
28. Newell KM. Knowledge of result and motor learning. Exercise and Sport Science Reviews, 1976; 4: 195-228
29. Park JH, Shea CH, Wright DL. Reduced-frequency concurrent and terminal feedback: A test of the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 2000; 32: 287-296
30. Sadowski J, Mastalerz A, Niźnikowski T, Wiśniowski W, Biegajło M, Kulik M. The effects of different types of verbal feedback on learning a complex movement task studies Pol. J. Sport Tourism, 2011; 18: 308-310
31. Sadowski J, Niźnikowska E, Niźnikowski T. Effectiveness of teaching the basic acrobatic exercises and patterns in the case of acrobats having different coordination potential. Pol. J. Sport Tourism, 2009; 16: 209-220
32. Salmoni AW, Schmidt RA, Walter CB. Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 1984; 95: 355-386
33. Schmidt RA. Motor learning and performance: From principles to practice. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1991
34. Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor control and learning. A behavioral emphasis. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1999
35. Sherwood DE. Effect of bandwidth knowledge of results on movement consistency. Perceptual and Motor Skills,1988; 66: 535-542
36. Smith PJ, Taylor SJ, Withers K. Applying bandwidth feedback scheduling to a golf shot. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1997; 68: 215-21
37. Swinnen SP. Information feedback for motor skill learning: A review. In H. N. Zelaznik (Ed.), Advances in motor learning and control. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 37-66; 1996
38. Swinnen SP, Lee TD, Verschueren S, Serrien DJ, Bogaerds H. Interlimb coordination: Learning and transfer under different feedback conditions. Human Movement Science, 1997; 16: 749-785
39. Tzetzis G, Votsis E. The effect of different feedback methods on badminton skills acquisition and retention. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 2006; 102: 275-284
40. Whiting HTA, Vereijken B. The acquisition of coordination in skill learning. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 1993; 24: 343-357
41. Winstein CJ, Schmidt RA. Reduced feedback of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1990; 16: 677-691
42. Wright DL, Munyon-Smith V, Sidaway B. How close is too close for precise knowledge of results? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1997; 68: 172-176
43. Wulf G, Shea CH. Principles derived from study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2002; 9: 185-211
44. Wulf G, Shea CH. Understanding the role of augmented feedback: The good, the bad, and the ugly. In A.M. Williams, and N.J. Hodges (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport. Oxford, England: Routledge, 121-144; 2004
45. Wulf G, Shea CH, Matschiner S. Frequent feedback enhances complex motor skill learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 1998; 30: 180-192
46. Young DE, Schmidt RA. Augmented feedback for enhanced skill acquisition. In G. E. Stelmach and J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior II Amsterdam: North-Holland. 677-693; 1992