Feedback Effects on Learning a Novel Bimanual Coordination Pattern: Support for the Guidance Hypothesis

Journal of Motor Behavior

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 45-54

  Maslovat, Dana ^a   Brunke, Kirstin M ^a   Chua, Romeo ^a   Franks, Ian M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Augmented feedback; Bimanual coordination; Guidance; Motor learning; Specificity

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HAND; HUMAN; LEARNING; LONG TERM MEMORY; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; BIMANUAL COORDINATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MOTOR COORDINATION; MOTOR LEARNING; NORMAL HUMAN; TASK PERFORMANCE;

FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MOTOR SKILLS; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY); TRANSFER (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 59249085447     PISSN: 00222895     EISSN: 19401027     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2009.10125923     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Adams, J. A. (1987). Historical review and appraisal of research on the learning, retention, and transfer of human motor skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 41-74.
2. Barnett, M. L., Ross, D., Schmidt, R. A., & Todd, B. (1973). Motor skills learning and the specificity of training principle. Research Quarterly, 44, 440-447.
3. Bennett, S., & Davids, K. (1995). The manipulation of vision during the powerlift squat: Exploring the boundaries of the specificity of learning hypothesis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 66, 210-218.
4. Desmurget, M., & Grafton, S. (2000). Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 423-431.
5. Fontaine, R. J., Lee, T. D., & Swinnen, S. R (1997). Learning a new bimanual coordination pattern: Reciprocal influences of intrinsic and to-be-learned patterns. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 1-9.
6. Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24, 95-112.
7. Henry, F. M. (1968). Specificity vs. generality in learning motor skill. In R. C. Brown & G. S. Kenyon (Eds.), Classical studies on physical activity (pp. 328-331). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
8. Hurley, S. R., & Lee, T. D. (2006). The influence of augmented feedback and prior learning on the acquisition of a new bimanual coordination pattern. Human Movement Science, 25, 339-348.
9. Khan, M. A., & Franks, I. M. (2004). The utilization of visual feedback in the acquisition of motor skills. In A. M. Williams & N. J. Hodges (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory and practice (pp. 121-144). New York: Routledge.
10. Khan, M. A., Franks, I. M., & Goodman, D. (1998). The effect of practice on the control of rapid aiming movements: Evidence for an interdependency between programming and feedback processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 425-444.
11. Klaiman, E., & Karniel, A. (2006). Bimanual adaptation: Internal representations of bimanual rhythmic movements. Experimental Brain Research, 171, 204-214.
12. Lee, T. D., Swinnen, S. P., & Verschueren, S. (1995). Relative phase alterations during bimanual skill acquisition. Journal of Motor Behavior, 27, 263-274.
13. Lee, T. D., & Wishart, L. R. (2005). Motor learning conundrums (and possible solutions). Quest, 57, 67-78.
14. Maslovat, D., Bredin, S. S. D., Chua, R., & Franks, I. M. (2005). Evaluation of scanning methodology in bimanual coordination. Motor Control, 9, 310-329.
15. Maslovat, D., Chua, R., Lee, T. D., & Franks, I. M. (2004). Contextual interference: Single task versus multi-task learning. Motor Control, 8, 213-233.
16. Maslovat, D., Chua, R., Lee, T. D., & Franks, I. M. (2006). Anchoring strategies for learning a bimanual coordination pattern. Journal of Motor Behavior, 38, 101-117.
17. Masters, R. S. W., & Maxwell, J. R (2004). Implicit motor learning, reinvestment and movement disruption: What you don't know won't hurt you? In A. M. Williams & N. J. Hodges (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory and practice (pp. 207-228). New York: Routledge.
18. Maxwell, J. R, Masters, R. S. W., Kerr, E., & Weedon, E. (2001). The implicit benefit of learning without errors. Quarterly Journal for Experimental Psychology, 54, 1049-1068.
19. Newell, K. M. (1977). Knowledge of results and motor learning. Exercise and Sports Science Reviews, 4, 195-228.
20. Park, J. H., Shea, C. H., & Wright, D. L. (2000). Reduced frequency concurrent and terminal feedback: A test of the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 32, 287-296.
21. Proteau, L. (1992). On the specificity of learning and the role of visual information for movement control. In L. Proteau & D. Elliot (Eds.), Vision and motor control (pp. 67-103). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
22. Proteau, L. (2005). Visual afferent information dominates other sources of afferent information during mixed practice of a videoaiming task. Experimental Brain Research, 161, 441-456.
23. Proteau, L., & Carnahan, H. (2001). What causes specificity of practice in a manual aiming movement: Vision dominance or transformation errors? Journal of Motor Behavior, 33, 226-234.
24. Proteau, L., Marteniuk, R. G., Girouard, Y., & Dugas, C. (1987). On the type of information used to control and learn an aiming movement after moderate and extensive training. Human Movement Science, 6, 181-199.
25. Proteau, L., Marteniuk, R. G., & Levesque, L. (1992). A sensorimotor basis for motor learning: Evidence indicating specificity of practice. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, 557-575.
26. Proteau, L., Tremblay, L., & DeJaeger, D. (1998). Practice does not diminish the role of visual information in on-line control of a precision walking task: Support for the specificity of practice hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 30, 143-150.
27. Ridderikhoff, A., Peper, C. E., & Beek, P. J. (2007). Error correction in bimanual coordination benefits from bilateral muscle activity: Evidence from kinesthetic tracking. Experimental Brain Research, 181, 31-48.
28. Robertson, S., Collins, J., Elliot, D., & Starkes, J. (1994). The influence of skill and intermittent vision on dynamic balance. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 333-339.
29. Salmoni, A. W., Schmidt, R. A., & Walter, C. B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 355-386.
30. Schmidt, R. A. (1991). Frequent augmented feedback can degrade learning: Evidence and interpretations. In J. Requin & G. E. Stelmach (Eds.). Tutorials in motor neuroscience (pp. 59-75). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
31. Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (2005). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis. Champaign. IL: Human Kinetics.
32. Schmidt, R. A., & Wulf, G. (1997). Continuous concurrent feedback degrades skill learning: Implications for training and simulation. Human Factors, 39, 509-525.
33. Schmidt, R. A., Young, D. E., Swinnen, S., & Shapiro, D. E. (1989). Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: Support for the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psyclwlogy: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 352-359.
34. Scholz, J. P., & Kelso, J. A. S. (1989). A quantitative approach to understanding the formation and change of coordinated movement patterns. Journal of Motor Behavior, 21, 122-144.
35. Soucy, M.-C., & Proteau, L. (2001). Development of multiple movement representations with practice: Specificity vs. flexibility. Journal of Motor Behavior, 33, 243-254.
36. Swinnen, S. P. (1996). Information feedback for motor skill learning: A review. In H. N. Zelaznik (Ed.), Advances in motor learning and control (pp. 37-66). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
37. Swinnen, S. P., Lee, T. D., Verschueren, S., Serrien, J., & Bogaerds, H. (1997). Interlimb coordination: Learning and transfer under different feedback conditions. Human Movement Science, 16, 749-785.
38. Swinnen, S. P., Walter, C. B., Lee, T. D., & Serrien, D. J. (1993). Acquiring bimanual skills: Contrasting different forms of information feedback for interlimb decoupling. Journal of Experimental Psyclwlogy: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1328-1344.
39. Tremblay, L., & Proteau, L. (1998). Specificity of practice: The case of powerlifting. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 69, 284-289.
40. Tremblay, L., & Proteau, L. (2001). Specificity of practice in a ball interception task. Canadian Jounwl of Experimental Psychiology, 55, 207-218.
41. Vander Linden, D. W., Cauraugh, J. H., & Greene, T. A. (1993). The effect of frequency of kinetic feedback on learning an isometric force production task in nondisabled subjects. Physical Therapy, 73, 79-87.
42. Wenderoth, N., & Bock, O. (2001). Learning a new bimanual coordination pattern is governed by three distinct processes. Motor Control, 4, 23-25.
43. Wenderoth, N., Bock, O., & Krohn, R. (2002). Learning a new bimanual coordination pattern is influenced by existing attractors. Motor Control, 6, 166-182.
44. Whiting, H. T. A., & Savelsbergh, G. J. P. (1992). An exception that proves the rule! In G. E. Stemlach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behaviour (Vol. 2, pp. 583-579). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
45. Whiting, H. T. A., Savelsbergh, G. J. P., & Pijpers, J. R. (1995). Specificity of motor learning does not deny flexibility. Applied Psychiology An International Review, 44, 315-332.
46. Winstein, C. J., Pohl, P. S., & Lewthwaite, R. (1994). Effects of physical guidance and knowledge of results on motor learning: Support for the guidance hypothesis. Research Quarterly' for Exercise and Sport, 65, 316-323.
47. Winstein, C. J., & Schmidt, R. A. (1990). Reduced feedback of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 677-691.
48. Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., & Flanagan, J. R. (2001). Perspectives and problems in motor learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 487-494.
49. Wulf, G. (1992). The learning of generalized motor programs and motor schemata: Effects of KR relative frequency and contextual interference. Journal of Human Movements Studies, 23, 53-76.
50. Wulf, G, Lee, T. D., & Schmidt, R. A. (1994). Reducing knowledge of results about relative versus absolute timing: Differential effects on learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 362-369.
51. Wulf, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). Directing attention to movement effects enhances learning: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 648-660.
52. Wulf, G., & Schmidt, R. A. (1989). The learning of generalized motor programs: Reducing the relative frequency of knowledge of results enhances memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 748-757.
53. Wulf, G., Schmidt, R. A., & Deubel, H. (1993). Reduced feedback frequency enhances generalized motor program learning but not parameterization learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1134-1150.
54. Wulf, G., & Shea, C. H. (2004). Understanding the role of augmented feedback: The good, the bad and the ugly. In A. M. Williams & N. J. Hodges (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory and practice (pp. 121-144). New York: Routledge.
55. Wulf, G., Shea, C. H., & Matschiner, S. (1998). Frequent feedback enhances complex motor skill learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 30, 180-192.
56. Yoshida, M., Cauraugh, J. H., & Chow, J. W. (2004). Specificity of practice, visual information, and intersegmental dynamics in rapid-aiming limb movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36, 281-290.