Feedback Schedules for Motor-Skill Learning: The Similarities and Differences between Physical and Observational Practice

Journal of Motor Behavior

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 257-268

  Badets, Arnaud ^a   Blandin, Yannick ^a  

^a Centre National de La Recherche Scientifique   (France)

Author keywords

Feedback; Observational learning; Relative timing; Sequence task

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COGNITION; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MOTOR SKILLS; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77957150372     PISSN: 00222895     EISSN: 19401027     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2010.497512     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Adams, J. A. (1971). A closcd-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3, 111-150.
2. Adams, J. A. (1986). Use of model's knowledge of results to increase the observer's performance. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 12, 89-98.
3. Badets, A., & Blandin, Y. (2004). The role of knowledge of results frequency in learning through observation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36, 62-70.
4. Badets, A., & Blandin, Y. (2005). Observational learning: Effects of bandwidth knowledge of results. Journal of Motor behavior, 37, 211-216.
5. Badets, A., Blandin, Y., & Shea, C. H. (2006a). Intention in motor learning through observation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 59. 377-386.
6. Badets, A., Blandin, Y., Wright, D. L., & Shea, C. H. (2006b). Error detection processes during observational learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 77, 177-184.
7. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
8. Blandin, Y., Lhuisset, L., & Proteau, L. (1999). Cognitive processes underlying observational learning of motor skills. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 52A, 957-979.
9. Blandin, Y., & Proteau, L. (2000). On the cognitive basis of observational learning: development of mechanisms for the detection and correction of errors. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 846-867.
10. Blandin, Y., Proteau, L., & Alain, C. (1994). On the cognitive processes underlying contextual interference and observational learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 18-26.
11. Blandin, Y., Toussaint, L., & Shea, C. H. (2008). Specificity of practice: interaction between concurrent sensory information and terminal feedback. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 34, 994-1000.
12. Buccino, G., Solodkin, A., & Small, S. (2006). Functions of the mirror neuron system: implications for neurorehabilitation. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology. 19. 55-63.
13. Buchanan, J. J., Ryu, Y. U., Zihlman, K., & Wright, D. L. (2008). Observational practice of relative but not absolute motion features in a single-limb multi-joint coordination task. Experimental Brain Research, 191, 157-169.
14. Butler, M. S, Reeve, T. G., & Fischman, M. G. (1996). Effects of the instructional set in the bandwidth feedback paradigm on motor skill acquisition. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67, 355-359.
15. Celnik, P., Webster, B., Glasser, D. M., & Cohen, L. G. (2008). Effects of action observation on physical training after stroke. Stroke, 39, 1814-1820.
16. Dominey, P. F., Lelekov, T., Ventre-Dominey, J., & Jeannerod, M. (1998). Dissociable processes for learning the surface structure and abstract structure of sensorimotor sequences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 734-751.
17. Eisner, B., & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psyclwlogy: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 229-240.
18. Ertelt, D., Small, S., Solodkin, A., McNamara, A., Binkofski, F., & Buccino, G. (2007). Action observation has a positive impact on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke. Neuroimage, 36, S2. T164-173.
19. Gallese, V., & Goldman, A. (1998). Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2, 493-501.
20. Greenwald, A. G. (1970). Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: With special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. Psychological Review, 77, 73-99.
21. Grfezes, J., & Decety, J. (2001). Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: A meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 12, 1-19.
22. Gribble, P. L., & Scott, S. H. (2002). Overlap of internal models in motor cortex for mechanical loads during reaching. Nature, 417. 938-941.
23. Jeannerod, M. (1999). To act or not to act: Perspectives on the representation of actions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52(A), 1-29.
24. Jeannerod, M. (2003). The mechanism of self-recognition in humans. Behavioural Brain Research, 142. 1-15.
25. Keele, S. W., Jennings, P., Jones, S., Caulton, D., & Cohen, A. (1995). On the modularity of sequence representation. Journal of Motor Behavior. 27, 17-30.
26. Kelso, J. A. S. (1997). Relative timing in brain and behavior: some observations about the generalized motor program and selforganized coordination dynamics. Human Movement Science, 16, 453-460.
27. Kunde, W., Eisner, K., & Kiesel, A. (2007). No anticipation-no action: the role of anticipation in action and perception. Cognitive Processing, 8, 71-78.
28. Lai, Q., & Shea, C. H. (1998). Generalized motor program (GMP) learning: effects of reduced frequency of knowledge of results and practice variability. Journal of Motor Behavior, 30, 51-59.
29. Lai, Q., & Shea, C. H. (1999). Bandwidth knowledge of results enhances generalized motor program learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 70, 79-83.
30. Lee, T. D., & Carnahan, H. (1990). Bandwidth knowledge of results and motor learning: more than just a relative frequency effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42A. 777-789.
31. Malfait, N., Valyear, K. F., Culham, J. C., Anion, J. L., Brown, L. E., & Gribble, P. L. (2010). fMRI Activation during observation of others' reach errors. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 22 1493-1503.
32. Mattar, A. A. G., & Gribble, P. L. (2005). Motor learning by observing. Neuron, 46, 153-160.
33. McCullagh, P., & Caird, J. K. (1990). Correct and learning models and retention of motor skill. Journal of Human Movement Studies. 18, 107-116.
34. Mechsner, F., Kerzel, D., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination. Nature. 414. 69-73.
35. Salmoni, A. W., Schmidt, R. A., & Walter, C. B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin. 95, 355-386.
36. Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review-, 82, 225-260.
37. Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (2005). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (4th ed.). Champaign. IL: Human Kinetics.
38. Schiitz-Bosbach, S., & Prinz, W. (2007). Perceptual resonance: Action-induced modulation of perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 349-355.
39. Scully, D. M., & Newell, K. M. (1985). Observational learning and the acquisition of motor skills: toward a visual perception perspective. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 11. 169-186.
40. Shea, C. H., Wright, D. L., Wulf, G., & Whitacre, C. (2000). Physical and observational practice afford unique learning opportunities. Journal of Motor Behavior, 32, 27-36.
41. Shea, C. H., & Wulf, G. (2005). Schema theory: A critical appraisal and re-evaluation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 37, 85-101.
42. Sherwood, D. E. (1988). Effects of bandwidth knowledge of results on movement consistency. Perceptual and Motor Skill. 66. 535-542.
43. Torriero, S., Oliveri, M., Koch, G., Caltagirone, C., & Petrosini, L. (2007). The what and how of observational learning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1656-1663
44. Verwey, W. B. (1999). Evidence for a multistage model of practice in a sequential movement task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1693-1708.
45. Vogt, S. (1995). On relations between perceiving, imaging and performing in the learning of cyclical movement sequences. British Journal of Psychology, 86, 191-216.
46. Wang, J., & Sainburg, R. L. (2006). Interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations depends on handedness. Experimental Brain Research. 175, 223-230.
47. Weeks, D. L., & Kordus, R. N. (1998). Relative frequency of knowledge of performance and motor skill learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 69, 224-230.
48. Winstein, C. J., & Schmidt, R. A. (1990). Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 76, 677-691.
49. Wulf, G. (1992). The learning of generalized motor programs and motor schemata: effects of KR relative frequency and contextual interference. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 23. 53-76.
50. Wulf, G., Lee, D. L., & Schmidt, R. A. (1994). Reducing knowledge of results about relative versus absolute timing: differential effects on learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 362-369.
51. Wulf, G., & Shea, C. H. (2004). Understanding the role of augmented feedback: the good, the bad, and the ugly. In A. M. Williams, N. J. Hodges, M. A. Scott, & M. L. J. Court (Eds.), Skill Acquisition in Sport: Research, Theory, and Practice (pp. 121-144). London: Routledge.