Approaches to teaching in high school when considering contextual variables and teacher variables;Enfoques de enseñanza en Bachillerato en función de variables contextuales y del docente

Revista de Psicodidactica

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 25-45

  Rosário, Pedro ^a   Núñez, José C ^b   Valle, Antonio ^c   Paiva, Olimpia ^a   Polydoro, Soely ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OVIEDO   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF A CORUÑA   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Approaches to teaching; Contextual variables; Structural equation modelling; Teacher variables

Indexed keywords

EID: 84891714006     PISSN: 11361034     EISSN: 22544372     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1387/RevPsicodidact.6215     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Arbuckle, J. L. (2009). Amos 18.0 User's Guide. Crawfordville: Amos Development Corporation.
2. Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS: Structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
3. De Juanas, A., y Beltrán, J. A. (2012). Epistemological Beliefs of Students of Pedagogy and Sciences of the Education. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 17(1), 179-197.
4. Finney S. J., y DiStefano C. (2006). Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modelling. En G. R. Hancock, y R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modelling. A second course (pp. 269-314). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
5. Gibbs, G., y Coffey, M. (2004). The impact of training of university teachers on their teaching skills, their approach to teaching, and the approach to learning of their students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5, 87-100. doi: 10.1177/1469787404040463.
6. Lacey, C. H., Saleh, A., y Gorman, R. (1998). Teaching nine to five: A study of the teaching styles of male and female professors. (ERIC ED 442334).
7. Lopes, J., y Santos, M. (en prensa). Teach ers' Beliefs, Teachers' Goals and Teachers' Classroom Management: A Study with Primary Teachers. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 18(1). doi: 10.1387/RevPsicodidact.4615
8. Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Trigwell, K., Nevgi, A., y Ashwin, P. (2006). How approaches to teaching are affected by discipline and teaching context. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 285-298. doi: 10.1080/03075070600680539.
9. Lueddeke, G. R. (2003). Professionalizing teaching practice in higher education: A study of disciplinary variation and 'teaching scholarship'. Studies in Higher Education, 28, 213-228. doi: 10.1080/0307507032000058082.
10. Miñano, P., y Castejón, J. L. (2011). Cognitive and Motivational Variables in the Academic Achievement in Language and Mathematics Subjects: A Structural Model. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 16(2), 203-230.
11. Nevgi, A., Postareff, L., y Lindblom- Ylänne, S. (2004, June). The effect of discipline on motivational and self-efficacy beliefs and on approaches to teaching of Finnish and English university teachers. A paper presented at the EARLI SIG Higher Education Conference.
12. Postareff, L., y Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2008). Variation in teachers' descriptions of teaching: Broadening the understanding of teaching in higher education. Learning and Instruction, 18, 109-120. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc. 2007.01.008.
13. Postareff, L., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., y Nevgi, A. (2007). The effect of pedagogical training on teaching in higher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 557-571. doi: 10.1016/j. tate.2006.11.013.
14. Prosser, M., y Trigwell, K. (1997). Relations between perceptions of the teaching environment and approaches to teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 25- 35. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1997. tb01224.x.
15. Prosser, M., y Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching. The experience in higher education. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
16. Prosser, M., y Trigwell, K. (2000). Understanding Learning and Teaching: The Experience in Higher Education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
17. Prosser, M., y Trigwell, K. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis of the approaches to teaching inventory. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 405-419. doi: 10.1348/000709905X43571.
18. Prosser, M., Ramsden, P., Trigwell, K., y Martin, E. (2003). Dissonance in experience of teaching and its relation to the quality of student learning. Studies in Higher Education, 28, 37- 48. doi 10.1080/03075070309299.
19. Prosser, M., Trigwell, K., y Taylor, P. (1994). A phenomenographic study of academics' conceptions of science learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 4, 217-232. doi:10.1016/0959-4752(94)90024-8.
20. nded.). London: Routledge.
21. Ramsden, P., Prosser, M., Trigwell, K., y Martin, E. (2007). University teachers' experiences of academic leadership and their approaches to teaching. Learning and Instruction, 17, 140-155. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc. 2007.01.004.
22. Rosário, P., Mourão, R., Baldaque, M., Nunes, T., Núñez, J. C., González- Pienda, J. A., …Valle, A. (2009). Homework, Self-Regulated Learning and Math Achievement. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 14, 179-192.
23. Rosário, P., Mourão, R., Trigo, L., Suárez, N., Fernández, E., y Tuero-Herrero, E. (2011). Uso de diarios de tareas para casa en el inglés como lengua extranjera: evaluación de pros y contras en el aprendizaje autorregulado y rendimiento. Psicothema, 23, 881-887.
24. Rosário, P., Mourão, R., Núñez, J. C., González-Pienda, J. A., Solano, P., y Valle, A. (2007). Eficacia de un programa instruccional para la mejora de procesos y estrategias de aprendizaje en la enseñanza superior. Psicothema, 19, 353-358.
25. Rosário, P., Núñez, J. C., González- Pienda, J. A., Valle, A., Trigo, L., y Guimarães, C. (2010). Enhancing self-regulation and approaches to learning in first-year college students: A narrative-based program assessed in the Iberian Peninsula. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 25, 411-428. doi: 10.1007/s10212- 010-0020-y.
26. Singer, E. (1996). Espoused teaching paradigms of college faculty. Research in Higher Education, 37, 659- 679. doi: 10.1007/BF01792951.
27. Stes, A., Gijbels, D., y Van Petegem, P. (2008). Student-focused approaches to teaching in relation to context and teacher characteristics. Higher Education, 55, 255-267. doi: 10.1007/ s10734-007-9053-9.
28. Trigwell, K., y Prosser, M. (1991). Relating approaches to study and the quality of learning outcomes at the course level. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 265-275. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1991. tb00984.x.
29. Trigwell, K., y Prosser, M. (1996a). Congruence between intention and strategy in university science teachers' approaches to teaching. Higher Education, 32, 77-87. doi: 10.1007/ BF00139219.
30. Trigwell, K., y Prosser, M. (1996b). Changing approaches to teaching: a relational perspectives. Studies in Higher Education, 21, 275-284. doi: 10.1080/03075079612331381211.
31. Trigwell, K., y Prosser, M. (2003). Qualitative difference in university teaching. In M. Tight (Ed.), Access and exclusion (pp. 185-216). London: JAI Elsevier Science.
32. Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., y Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37, 57-70. doi: 10.1080/03075079612331381211.
33. Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 166-183. doi: 10.3102/0002831207312909.