Confirmatory factor analysis of the approaches to teaching inventory

British Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 76, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 405-419

  Prosser, Michael ^a,c   Trigwell, Keith ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c HIGHER EDUCATION ACADEMY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EDUCATION; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; METHODOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCHOOL; SCIENCE; STANDARD; STUDENT; TEACHING;

FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SCHOOLS; SCIENCE; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

EID: 33745650074     PISSN: 00070998     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/000709905X43571     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Hawthorne, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.
2. Biggs, J. B. (1993). From theory to practice: A cognitive systems approach. Higher Education Research and Development, 12, 73-85.
3. Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2001). The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133-149.
4. Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modelling with AMOS. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Dunkin, M.J., &Biddle, B. J. (1974). The study of teaching. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
6. Eley, M. G. (1993). Differential adoption of study approaches within individual students. Higher Education, 23, 231-254.
7. Entwistle, N. J., Tait, H., & McCune, V. (2000). Patterns of response to an approaches to studying inventory across contrasting groups and contexts. European Journal of the Psychology of Education, 15, 33-48.
8. Gibbs, G., & Coffey, M. (2004). The impact of training of university teachers on their skills, their approaches to teaching and the approach to learning of their students. Active Learning, 5, 87-100.
9. Kember, D. (1997). A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics' conceptions of teaching. Learning and Instruction, 7, 255-275.
10. Kember, D., Biggs, J., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2004). Examining the multidimensionality of approaches to learning through the development of a revised version of the Learning Process Questionnaire. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 261-280.
11. Laurillard, D. (1997). Styles and approaches in problem-solving, In F. Marton, D. Hounsell & N. J. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning: Implications for teaching and studying in higher education (2nd ed., pp. 126-144). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
12. Martin, E., Prosser, M., Trigwell, K., Ramsden, P., & Benjamin, J. (2000). What university teachers teach and how they teach it. Instructional Science, 28, 387-412.
13. Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Marton, F., Hounsell, D., & Entwistle, N. (1997). The experience of learning (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
15. Preacher, K. J., & MacCallum, R. C. (2003). Repairing Tom Swift's electric factor analysis machine. Understanding Statistics, 2, 13-43.
16. Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1992). Development of an approaches to teaching questionnaire. Research and Development in Higher Education, 15, 468-473.
17. Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1997). Relations between perceptions of the teaching environment and approaches to teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 25-35.
18. Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
19. Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge Falmer.
20. Rubio, D. M., & Gillespie, D. F. (1995). Problems with error in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 2(4), 367-378.
21. Samuelowicz, K., & Bain, J. D. (1992). Conceptions of teaching held by academic teachers. Higher Education, 24, 93-111
22. Samuelowicz, K., & Bain, J. D. (2001). Revisiting academics' beliefs about teaching and learning. Higher Education, 41, 299-325.
23. Tait, H., Entwistle, N.J., & McCune, V. (1998). ASSIST: A reconceptualisation of the Approaches to Studying Inventory. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving students as learners. Oxford: Oxford Brookes University, The Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
24. Trigwell, K. (2002). Approaches to teaching design subjects: A quantitative analysis. Art, Design and Communication in Higher Education, 1, 69-80.
25. Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1996a). Changing approaches to teaching: A relational perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 21, 275-284.
26. Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1996b). Congruence between intention and strategy in science teachers' approach to teaching. Higher Education, 32, 77-87.
27. Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (2004). Development and use of the Approaches to Teaching Inventory. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 409-424.
28. Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Taylor, P. (1994). Qualitative differences in approaches to teaching first year university science. Higher Education, 27, 75-84.
29. Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37, 57-70.