Neural correlates of ideomotor effect anticipations

Neuroscience

Volumn 259, Issue , 2014, Pages 164-171

  Pfister, R ^a,b   Melcher, T ^a,c   Kiesel, A ^b   Dechent, P ^a   Gruber, O ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Action control; Action effects; Ideomotor theory; Sensory anticipations

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANTICIPATION; ARTICLE; BRAIN REGION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; FEMALE; FRONTAL CORTEX; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IDEOMOTOR EFFECT ANTICIPATION; LEFT HEMISPHERE; LINGUAL GYRUS; MALE; MOTOR CONTROL; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PARAHIPPOCAMPAL GYRUS; PARIETAL CORTEX; PARIETAL GYRUS; PRECUNEUS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ACTION CONTROL; ACTION EFFECTS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANOVA; FMRI; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; IDEOMOTOR THEORY; REACTION TIME; RT; SENSORY ANTICIPATIONS;

ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INTENTION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; OXYGEN; REACTION TIME; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; THEORY OF MIND; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84891623159     PISSN: 03064522     EISSN: 18737544     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.11.061     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Ansorge A. Spatial intention-response compatibility. Acta Psychol 2002, 109:285-299.
2. Badets A., Koch I., Toussaint L. Role of an ideomotor mechanism in number processing. Exp Psyhol 2013, 60:34-43.
3. Botvinick M., Nystrom L.E., Fissell K., Carter C.S., Cohen J.D. Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex. Nature 1999, 402:179-181.
4. Desmurget M., Reilly K.T., Richard N., Szathmari A., Mottolese C., Sirigu A. Movement intention after parietal cortex stimulation in humans. Science 2009, 324:811-813.
5. Elsner B., Hommel B. Effect anticipation and action control. J Exp Psychol 2001, 27:229-240.
6. Elsner B., Hommel B., Mentschel C., Drzezga A., Prinz W., Conrad B., Siebner H. Linking actions and their perceivable consequences in the human brain. NeuroImage 2002, 17:364-372.
7. Fogassi L., Ferrari P.F., Gesierich B., Rozzi S., Chersi F., Rizzolatti G. Parietal lobe: from action organization to intention understanding. Science 2005, 308:662-667.
8. Gaschler R., Nattkemper D. Instructed task demands and utilization of action effect anticipation. Front Psychol 2012, 3:578.
9. Gehring W.J., Knight R.T. Prefrontal-cingulate interactions in action monitoring. Nat Neurosci 2000, 3:516-520.
10. Goldenberg G. Apraxia and the parietal lobes. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:1449-1459.
11. Haggard P. Human volition: towards a neuroscience of will. Nat Rev Neurosci 2008, 9:934-946.
12. Hayes S.M., Ryan L., Schnyer D.M., Nadel L. An fMRI study of episodic memory: retrieval of object, spatial, and temporal information. Behav Neurosci 2004, 118:885-896.
13. Herbart J.F. Psychologie als Wissenschaft neu gegründet auf Erfahrung, Metaphysik und Mathematik 1825, [Psychology as a Science Newly Founded on Experience, Metaphysics, and Mathematics], August Wilhelm Unzer, Königsberg.
14. Herwig A., Waszak F. Action-effect bindings and ideomotor learning in intention- and stimulus-based actions. Front Psychol 2012, 3:444.
15. Herwig A., Prinz W., Waszak F. Two modes of sensorimotor integration in intention-based and stimulus-based actions. Q J Exp Psychol 2007, 60:1540-1554.
16. Hoffmann J., Lenhard A., Sebald A., Pfister R. Movements or targets: What makes an action in action-effect learning?. Q J Exp Psychol 2009, 62:2433-2449.
17. Hommel B., Müsseler J., Aschersleben G., Prinz W. The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behav Brain Sci 2001, 24:849-878.
18. Hubbard J., Gazzaley A., Morsella E. Traditional response interference effects from anticipated action outcomes: a response-effect compatibility paradigm. Acta Psychol 2011, 138:106-110.
19. Jahanshahi M., Jenkins I.H., Brown R.G., Mardsen C.D., Passingham R.E., Brooks D.J. Self-initiated versus externally triggered movements: I. An investigation using measurement of regional cerebral blood flow with PET and movement-related potentials in normal and Parkinson's disease subjects. Brain 1995, 118:913-933.
20. Janczyk M., Skirde S., Weigelt M., Kunde W. Visual and tactile action effects determine bimanual coordination performance. Human Mov Sci 2009, 28:437-449.
21. Karch S., Feuerecker R., Leicht G., Meindl T., Hantschk I., Kirsch V., Ertl M., Lutz J., Pogarell O., Mulert C. Separating distinct aspects of the voluntary selection between response alternatives: N2- and P3-related BOLD responses. NeuroImage 2010, 51:356-364.
22. Karnath H.O., Ferber S., Himmelbach M. Spatial awareness is a function of the temporal not the posterior parietal lobe. Nature 2001, 411:950-953.
23. Kerns J.G., et al. Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science 2004, 303:1023-1026.
24. Kühn S., Seurinck R., Fias W., Waszak F. The internal anticipation of sensory action effects: When action induces FFA and PPA activity. Front Hum Neurosci 2010, 4:1-7.
25. Kühn S., Keizer A., Rombouts S.A., Hommel B. The functional and neural mechanism of action preparation: roles of EBA and FFA in voluntary action control. J Cogn Neurosci 2011, 23:214-220.
26. Kunde W. Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. J Exp Psychol 2001, 27:387-394.
27. Kunde W., Koch I., Hoffmann J. Anticipated action effects affect the selection, initiation, and execution of actions. Q J Exp Psychol 2004, A57:87-106.
28. Melcher T., Weidema M., Eenshuistra R.M., Hommel B., Gruber O. The neural substrate of the ideomotor principle: an event-related fMRI analysis. NeuroImage 2008, 39:1274-1288.
29. Melcher T., Winter D., Hommel B., Pfister R., Dechent P., Gruber O. The neural substrate of the ideomotor principle revisited: evidence for asymmetries in action-effect learning. Neuroscience 2013, 231:13-27.
30. Pesaran B., Nelson M.J., Andersen R.A. Free choice activates a decision circuit between frontal and parietal cortex. Nature 2008, 453:406-409.
31. Pfister R., Kunde W. Dissecting the response in response-effect compatibility. Exp Brain Res 2013, 224:647-655.
32. Pfister R., Kiesel A., Melcher T. Adaptive control of ideomotor effect anticipations. Acta Psychol 2010, 135:316-322.
33. Pfister R., Kiesel A., Hoffmann J. Learning at any rate: action-effect learning for stimulus-based actions. Psychol Res 2011, 75:61-65.
34. Pfister R., Schwarz K.A., Janczyk M. Ubi irritatio, ibi affluxus: a 19th century perspective on haemodynamic brain activity. Cortex 2012, 48:1061-1063.
35. Pfister R., Dignath D., Hommel B., Kunde W. It takes two to imitate: anticipation and imitation in social interaction. Psychol Sci 2013, 24:2117-2121.
36. Pfister R, Janczyk M, Gressmann M, Fournier LR, Kunde W (2013b) Good vibrations? Vibrotactile self-stimulation reveals anticipation of body-related action effects in motor control. Exp Brain Res. doi:10.1007/s00221-013-3796-6.
37. Rieger M. Letters as visual action-effects in skilled typing. Acta Psychol 2007, 126:138-153.
38. Rizzolatti G., Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Ann Rev Neurosci 2004, 27:169-192.
39. Rizzolatti G., Matelli M. Two different streams from the dorsal visual system: anatomy and functions. Exp Brain Res 2003, 153:146-157.
40. Rowe J.B., Hughes L., Nimmo-Smith I. Action selection: a race model for selected and non-selected actions distinguishes the contribution of premotor and prefrontal areas. NeuroImage 2010, 51:888-896.
41. Ruge H., Müller S.C., Braver T.S. Anticipating the consequences of action: an fMRI study of intention-based task preparation. Psychophysiology 2010, 47:1019-1027.
42. Shin Y.K., Proctor R.W., Capaldi E.J. A review of contemporary ideomotor theory. Psychol Bull 2010, 136:943-974.
43. Sirigu A., Daprati E., Ciancia S., Giraux P., Nighoghossian N., Posada A., Haggard P. Altered awareness of voluntary action after damage to the parietal cortex. Nat Neurosci 2004, 7:80-85.
44. Spengler S., von Cramon Y.D., Brass M. Was it me or was it you? How the sense of agency originates from ideomotor learning revealed by fMRI. NeuroImage 2009, 46:290-298.
45. Wolfensteller U., Ruge H. On the timescale of stimulus-based action-effect learning. Q J Exp Psychol 2011, 64:1273-1289.
46. Wolpert D.M., Ghahramani Z. Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nat Neurosci 2000, 3:1212-1217.
47. Wolpert D.M., Ghahramani Z., Jordan M.I. An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 1995, 269:1880-1882.
48. Wolpert D.M., Goodbody S.J., Husain M. Maintaining internal representations: the role of the human superior parietal lobe. Nat Neurosci 1998, 1:529-533.
49. Zwosta K., Ruge H., Wolfensteller U. No anticipation without intention: response-effect compatibility in effect-based and stimulus-based actions. Acta Psychol 2013, 144:628-634.