Comparative study of image quality and radiation dose of cone beam and low-dose multislice computed tomography - an in-vitro investigation

Clinical Oral Investigations

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 301-311

  Hofmann, Elisabeth ^a   Schmid, Matthias ^b   Sedlmair, Martin ^c   Banckwitz, Rosemarie ^c   Hirschfelder, Ursula ^a   Lell, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ERLANGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^c SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cone beam computed tomography; Image quality; Multislice computed tomography; Radiation dosage

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CADAVER; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEAD; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IN VITRO STUDY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; RADIATION DOSE; RADIOGRAPHY; STANDARDS;

ADULT; CADAVER; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEAD; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IN VITRO TECHNIQUES; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; RADIATION DOSAGE;

EID: 84891557357     PISSN: 14326981     EISSN: 14363771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-013-0948-9     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Kalender WA (2005) Computed tomography: fundamentals, system technology, image quality, applications, 2nd edn. Publicis, Erlangen.
2. Lascala CA, Panella J, Marques MM (2004) Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-New Tom). Dentomaxillofac Radiol 33: 291-294.
3. Holberg C, Steinhäuser S, Geis P, Rudzki-Janson I (2005) Cone beam computed tomography in orthodontics: benefits and limitations. J Orofac Orthop 66: 434-444.
4. Pauwels R et al (2011) Quantification of metal artifacts on cone beam computed tomography images. Clin Oral Implants Res. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1600-0501. 2011. 02382. x.
5. Coppenrath E, Draenert F, Lechel U, Veit R, Meindl T, Reiser M et al (2008) Schnittbildverfahren zur dentomaxillofacialen Diagnostik: dosisvergleich von Dental-MSCT und New Tom 9000 DVT. Fortschr Röntgenstr 180: 396-401.
6. Periago D, Scarfe W, Moshiri M, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG (2008) Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program. Angle Orthod 78: 387-395.
7. Suomalainen A, Kiljunen T, Käser Y, Peltola J, Kortesniemi M (2009) Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 38: 367-378.
8. Arai Y, Tammisalo E, Iwai K, Hashimoto K, Shinoda K (1999) Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 28: 245-248.
9. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL, Howerton WB (2006) Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3 G, i-Cat. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 35: 219-226.
10. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, White SC (2008) Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examination: the impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculations. J Am Dent Assoc 139(9): 1237-1243.
11. Loubele M, Bogaerts R, Dijck V, Pauwels R, Vanheusden S, Suetens P et al (2009) Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. Eur J Radiol 71: 461-468.
12. Okano T, Harata Y, Sugihara Y, Sakaino R, Tsuchida R, Iwai K et al (2009) Absorbed and effective doses from cone beam volumetric imaging for implant planning. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 38: 79-85.
13. Schulze D, Heiland M, Thurmann H, Adam G (2004) Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4- and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 33: 83-86.
14. Tsiklakis K, Donta C, Gavala S, Karayianni K, Kamenopoulou V, Hourdakis CJ (2005) Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose cone beam CT. Eur J Radiol 56(3): 413-417.
15. Liang X, Jacobs R, Hassan B, Li L, Pauwels R, Corpas L et al (2010) A comparative evaluation of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multi-slice CT (MSCT). Part I: on subjective image quality. Eur J Radiol 75: 265-269.
16. Carrafiello G, Dizonno M, Colli V, Strocchi S, Taubert SP, Leonardi A et al (2010) Comparative study of jaws with multislice computed tomography and cone-beam computed tomography. Radiol med 115: 600-611.
17. Pauwels R, Theodorakou C, Walker A, Bosmans H, Jacobs R, Horner K, Bogaerts R, The SEDENTEXCT Project Consortium (2012) Dose distribution for dental cone beam CT and its implication for defining a dose index. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 41(7): 583-593.
18. Hashimoto K, Kawashima S, Kameoka S, Akiyama Y, Honjoya T, Ejima K et al (2007) Comparison of image validity between cone beam computed tomography for dental use and multidetector row helical computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 36: 465-471.
19. Loubele M, Maes F, Jacobs R, van Steenberghe WSC, Suetens P (2008) Comparative study of image quality for MSCT and CBCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial radiology applications. Radiat Prot Dosim 129: 222-226.
20. Kyriakou Y, Kolditz D, Langner O, Krause J, Kalender W (2010) Digital volume tomography (DVT) and multislice spiral CT (MSCT): an objective examination of dose and image quality. Fortschr Röntgenstr 183: 144-153.
21. Fleiss JL, Cohen J (1973) The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. EPM 33: 613-619.
22. Janson H, Olsson U (2001) A measure of agreement for interval or nominal multivariate observations. EPM 61: 277-289.
23. Hollander M, Wolfe DA (1999) Nonparametric Statistical Methods, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York.
24. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33: 159-174.
25. Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M (2008) Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 106: 930-938.
26. Hofmann E, Medelnik J, Fink M, Lell M, Hirschfelder U (2011) Three-dimensional volume tomographic study of the imaging accuracy of impacted teeth: MSCT and CBCT comparison-an in vitro study. Eur J Orthod. doi: 10. 1093/ejo/cjr030.
27. Rustemeyer P, Streubühr U, Suttmoeller J (2004) Low-dose dental computed tomography: significant dose reduction without loss of image quality. Acta Radiol 45: 847-853.
28. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA (1998) A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging base on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 8: 1558-1564.
29. Mah JK, Danforth RA, Bumann A, Hatcher D (2003) Radiation absorbed in maxillofacial imaging with a new dental computed tomography device. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 96: 508-513.
30. Kobayashi K, Shimoda S, Nakagawa Y, Yamamoto A (2004) Accuracy in measurement of distance using limited cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 19: 228-231.
31. Damstra J, Fourie Z, Huddleston Slater JJ, Ren Y (2010) Accuracy of linear measurements from cone-beam computed tomography-derived surface models of different voxel sizes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137: 16. e1-16. e6, discussion 16-7.
32. Hirschfelder U (2008) Stellungsnahme: Radiologische 3D-Diagnostik in der Kieferothopädie (CT/DVT). J Orofac Orthoped 69: 484-487.
33. Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Collaert B, Theodorakou C, Rogers J, Walker A et al (2011) Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. Eur J Radiol 81(2): 267-271. doi: 10. 1016/j. ejrad. 2010. 11. 028.
34. Swennen G, Schutyser F (2006) Three-dimensional cephalometry: spiral multi-slice vs. cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 130: 410-416.
35. Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz (2010) http://www. bfs. de/de/ion/wirkungen/grenzwerte. html.
36. Schulze R, Heil U, Groß DD, Dranischnikow E, Schwanecke U, Schoemer E (2011) Artefacts in CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 40: 265-273.