Three-dimensional volume tomographic study of the imaging accuracy of impacted teeth: MSCT and CBCT comparison - An in vitro study

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 286-294

  Hofmann, Elisabeth ^a   Medelnik, Jürgen ^a   Fink, Martin ^a   Lell, Michael ^a   Hirschfelder, Ursula ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ERLANGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; SWINE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH; TOOTH DISEASE;

ANIMALS; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MODELS, ANIMAL; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SWINE; TOOTH, IMPACTED; TOOTH, UNERUPTED;

EID: 84878597341     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: 14602210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjr030     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bishara S 1998 Clinical management of impacted maxillary canines. Seminars in Orthodontics 4: 87-98
2. Bland M 2000 An introduction to medical statistics. Oxford University Press, Oxford
3. Boldt F, Weinzierl C, Hertrich K, Hirschfelder U 2009 Comparison of the spatial landmark scatter of various 3D digitalization methods. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics 70: 247-263
4. Cohnen M, Kemper J, Möbes O, Pawelzik J, Mödder U 2002 Radiation dose in dental radiology. European Radiology 12: 634-637 (Pubitemid 36940109)
5. Coppenrath E et al. 2008 Schnittbildverfahren zur dentomaxillofacialen Diagnostik: Dosisvergleich von Dental-MSCT und New Tom 9000 DVT. Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren 180: 396-401 (Pubitemid 351985348)
6. Damstra J, Fourie Z, Huddleston Slater J J, Ren Y 2010 Accuracy of linear measurements from cone-beam computed tomography-derived surface models of different voxel sizes. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 16: e1-e6
7. Douglas W R 1972 Of pigs and men and research: a review of applications and analogies of the pig, Sus scrofa, in human medical research. Origins of life and evolution of biospheres 3: 226-234
8. Draenert F, Coppenrath E, Herzog P, Mueller S, Mueller-Lisse U G 2007 Beam hardening artefacts occur in dental implant scans with the NewTom (R) cone beam CT but not with the dental 4-row multidetector CT. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 36: 198-203 (Pubitemid 46999234)
9. Farman A G 2005 ALARA still applies. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics 100: 395-397 (Pubitemid 41331026)
10. Hirschfelder U 1994 Radiologische Übersichtsdarstellung des Gebisses: Dental-CT versus Orthopantomographie. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics 55: 14-21
11. Hirschfelder U, Petschelt A 1986 Retention von Zähnen aus kieferorthopädischer Sicht. Deutsche Zahnärztliche Zeitung 41: 164-170
12. Holberg C, Steinhäuser S, Geis P, Rudzki-Janson I 2005 Cone beam computed tomography in orthodontics: benefits and limitations. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics 66: 434-444
13. International Comission on Radiation Protection. 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Annals of the ICRP Elsevier, Oxford
14. Keeve E, Kusch J, Hey J 2007 Grundlagen der DVT-Technologie. In: Zöller J (ed). Digitale Volumentomographie in der Zahn- Mund-und Kieferheilkunde. Quintessenz-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 3-22
15. Kim K D, Ruprecht A, Jeon K J, Park C S 2003 Personal computer-based three-dimensional computed tomographic images of the teeth for evaluating supernumerary of ectopically impacted teeth. Angle Orthodontist 73: 614-621 (Pubitemid 38968893)
16. Kobayashi K, Shimoda S, Nakagawa Y, Yamamoto A 2004 Accuracy in measurement of distance using limited cone-beam computerized tomography. The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 19: 228-231 (Pubitemid 38561060)
17. Lascala C A, Panella J, Marques M M 2004 Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-New Tom). Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 33: 291-294 (Pubitemid 40288455)
18. Liang X et al. 2010a A comparative evaluation of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multi-slice CT (MSCT): Part I. On subjective image quality. European Journal of Radiology 75: 265-269
19. Liang X et al. 2010b A comparative evaluation of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multi-slice CT (MSCT). Part II: On 3D model accuracy. European Journal of Radiology 75: 270-274
20. Loubele M et al. 2008 Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. European Journal of Radiology. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.06.002
21. Ludlow J, Davies-Ludlow L, Brooks S, Howerton W B 2006 Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CBMercury, NewTom 3G and i-Cat. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 35: 219-226 (Pubitemid 44076876)
22. Ludlow J B, Ivanovic M 2008 Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics 106: 106-114
23. Martin R F 2000 General deming regression for estimating systematic bias and its confidence interval in method-comparison studies. Clinical Chemistry 46(1); 100-104 (Pubitemid 30090965)
24. Periago D, Scarfe W, Moshiri M, Scheetz J, Silveira A, Farman A 2008 Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program. Angle Orthodontist 78: 387-395
25. Rakosi T H, Janson I 1989 Kieferorthopädische Diagnostik. Band 8. In: Rateitschak K H (ed). Farbatlanten der Zahnmedizin. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp. 208-235
26. Sakabe J, Kuroki Y, Fujimaki S, Nakajima I, Honda K 2007 Reproducibility and accuracy of measuring unerupted teeth using limited cone beam X-ray CT. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 36: 2-6 (Pubitemid 46490721)
27. Scarfe W C, Farman A G, Sukovic P 2006 Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. Journal of the Canadian Dental Association 72: 75-80 (Pubitemid 43326970)
28. Schmuth G P F, Freisfeld M, Köster O, Schüller H 1992 The application of computerized tomography (CT) in cases of impacted maxillary canines. European Journal of Orthodontics 14: 296-301
29. Sherrard J F, Roussouw P E, Benson B W, Carillo R, Buschang P H 2010 Accuracy and reliability of tooth and root lengths measured on cone-beam computed tomographs. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 137: 100-108
30. Suomalainen A, Vehmas T, Kortesniemi M, Robinson S, Peltola J 2008 Accuracy of linear measurements using dental cone beam and multislice computed tomography. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 37: 10-17 (Pubitemid 351211971)
31. Swennen G, Schutyser F 2006 Three-dimensional cephalometry: spiral multi-slice vs cone-beam computed tomography. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 130: 410-416 (Pubitemid 44376705)
32. Walker L, Enciso R, Mah J 2005 Three-dimensional localisation of maxillary canines with cone-beam computed tomography. Journal American of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 128: 418-423 (Pubitemid 41427086)