Accuracy in measurement of distance using limited cone-beam computerized tomography

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 228-231

  Kobayashi, Kaoru ^a   Shimoda, Shinji ^a   Nakagawa, Yoichi ^a   Yamamoto, Akira ^a  

^a TSURUMI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cone beam computerized tomography; Dental implants; Mandibular surgery; Spiral computerized tomography

Indexed keywords

ALVEOLAR RIDGE; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MANDIBLE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING;

ALVEOLAR PROCESS; CADAVER; CEPHALOMETRY; HUMANS; MANDIBLE; MATCHED-PAIR ANALYSIS; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL COMPUTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 2342419992     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. White SC, Heslop EW, Hollender LG, et al. Parameters of radiologic care: An official report of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001;91:498-511.
2. Klinge B, Petersson A, Maly P. Location of the mandibular canal: Comparison of macroscopic findings, conventional radiography, and computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:327-332.
3. Naitoh M, Kawamata A, Iida H, Ariji E. Cross-sectional imaging of the jaws for dental implant treatment: Accuracy of linear tomography using a panoramic machine in comparison with reformatted computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:107-112.
4. Lecomber AR, Yoneyama Y, Lovelock DJ, Hosoi T, Adams AM. Comparison of patient dose from imaging protocols for dental implant planning using conventional radiography and computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2001;30:255-259.
5. Arai Y, Tammisalo E, Iwai K, Hashimoto K, Shinoda K. Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999;28:245-248.
6. Ito K, Gomi Y, Sato S, Arai Y, Shinoda K. Clinical application of a new compact CT system to assess 3-D images for the preoperative treatment planning of implants in the posterior mandible. A case report. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:539-542.
7. Nakagawa Y, Kobayashi K, Ishii H, et al. Preoperative application of limited cone beam computerized tomography as an assessment tool before minor oral surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;31:322-326.
8. Mishima A, Kobayashi K, Yamamoto A, Kimura Y, Tanaka M. Comparison of patient radiation dose from Dental CT and Spiral CT. Symposium of high technology research center in Tsurumi University School of Dental Medicine. Yokohama, Japan: Nagasue Shoten, 2001:171-172.
9. Wyatt CC, Pharoah MJ. Imaging techniques and image interpretation for dental implant treatment. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:442-452.
10. Bianchi SD, Lojacono A. 2D and 3D images generated by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for dentomaxillofacial investigations. In: Lemke HU (ed). CAR '98: Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery: Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium and Exhibition, Tokyo, 24-27 June 1998. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1998:792-797.