The ectodysplasin pathway: From diseases to adaptations

Trends in Genetics

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 24-31

  Sadier, Alexa ^a   Viriot, Laurent ^a   Pantalacci, Sophie ^a   Laudet, Vincent ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Anhidrotic hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia; Ectodermal appendages; Ectodysplasin; Signaling pathways

Indexed keywords

ECTODYSPLASIN A; EDAR ASSOCIATED DEATH DOMAIN PROTEIN; EDAR RECEPTOR; IMMUNOGLOBULIN ENHANCER BINDING PROTEIN;

ECTODERMAL DYSPLASIA; ECTODYSPLASIN PATHWAY; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; FEATHER; FRESHWATER FISH; GENE MUTATION; HUMAN; HYPOHIDROTIC ECTODERMAL DYSPLASIA; HYPOTRICHOSIS; NATURAL POPULATION; NONHUMAN; OLIGODONTIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STICKLEBACK; TELEOST;

ADAPTATION; ANHIDROTIC/HYPOHIDROTIC ECTODERMAL DYSPLASIA; ECTODERMAL APPENDAGES; ECTODYSPLASIN; SIGNALING PATHWAYS;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; ECTODERMAL DYSPLASIA 1, ANHIDROTIC; ECTODYSPLASINS; EDAR RECEPTOR; EDAR-ASSOCIATED DEATH DOMAIN PROTEIN; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; HUMANS; NF-KAPPA B; RECEPTORS, TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; VERTEBRATES;

EID: 84891155412     PISSN: 01689525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2013.08.006     Document Type: Review

References (94)

1. Darwin C. The Variations of Animals and Plants under Domestication 1875, John Murray.
2. Wiśniewski S.A., et al. Recent advances in understanding of the molecular basis of anhidrotic ectodermal dysplasia: discovery of a ligand, ectodysplasin A and its two receptors. J. Appl. Genet. 2002, 43:97-107.
3. Cluzeau C., et al. Only four genes (EDA1, EDAR, EDARADD, and WNT10A) account for 90% of hypohidrotic/anhidrotic ectodermal dysplasia cases. Hum. Mutat. 2011, 32:70-72.
4. Colosimo P.F., et al. Widespread parallel evolution in sticklebacks by repeated fixation of Ectodysplasin alleles. Science 2005, 307:1928-1933.
5. Kamberov Y.G., et al. Modeling recent human evolution in mice by expression of a selected EDAR variant. Cell 2013, 152:691-702.
6. Kere J., et al. X-linked anhidrotic (hypohidrotic) ectodermal dysplasia is caused by mutation in a novel transmembrane protein. Nat. Genet. 1996, 13:409-416.
7. Srivastava A.K., et al. Fine mapping of the EDA gene: a translocation breakpoint is associated with a CpG island that is transcribed. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1996, 58:126-132.
8. Sofaer J.A. Aspects of the Tabby-crinkled-downless syndrome. I. The development of Tabby teeth. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 1969, 22:181-205.
9. Ferguson B.M., et al. Cloning of Tabby, the murine homolog of the human EDA gene: evidence for a membrane-associated protein with a short collagenous domain. Hum. Mol. Genet. 1997, 6:1589-1594.
10. Srivastava A.K., et al. The Tabby phenotype is caused by mutation in a mouse homologue of the EDA gene that reveals novel mouse and human exons and encodes a protein (ectodysplasin-A) with collagenous domains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1997, 94:13069-13074.
11. Headon D.J., Overbeek P.A. Involvement of a novel Tnf receptor homologue in hair follicle induction. Nat. Genet. 1999, 22:370-374.
12. Monreal A.W., et al. Mutations in the human homologue of mouse dl cause autosomal recessive and dominant hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia. Nat. Genet. 1999, 22:366-369.
13. Mikkola M.L., Thesleff I. Ectodysplasin signaling in development. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2003, 14:211-224.
14. Headon D.J., et al. Gene defect in ectodermal dysplasia implicates a death domain adapter in development. Nature 2001, 414:913-916.
15. Shimomura Y., et al. A rare case of hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia caused by compound heterozygous mutations in the EDAR gene. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2004, 123:649-655.
16. Mikkola M.L. Molecular aspects of hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2009, 149A:2031-2036.
17. Chassaing N., et al. Mutations in EDARADD account for a small proportion of hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia cases. Br. J. Dermatol. 2010, 162:1044-1048.
18. Tarpey P., et al. A novel Gln358Glu mutation in ectodysplasin A associated with X-linked dominant incisor hypodontia. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2007, 143:390-394.
19. Han D., et al. Novel EDA mutation resulting in X-linked non-syndromic hypodontia and the pattern of EDA-associated isolated tooth agenesis. Eur. J. Med. Genet. 2008, 51:536-546.
20. Tao R., et al. A novel missense mutation of the EDA gene in a Mongolian family with congenital hypodontia. J. Hum. Genet. 2006, 51:498-502.
21. Casal M.L., et al. Mutation identification in a canine model of X-linked ectodermal dysplasia. Mamm. Genome 2005, 16:524-531.
22. Drögemüller C., et al. Partial deletion of the bovine ED1 gene causes anhidrotic ectodermal dysplasia in cattle. Genome Res. 2001, 11:1699-1705.
23. Kuramoto T., et al. A rat model of hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia carries a missense mutation in the Edaradd gene. BMC Genet. 2011, 12:91.
24. Houghton L., et al. The ectodysplasin pathway in feather tract development. Development 2005, 132:863-872.
25. Drew C.F., et al. The Edar subfamily in feather placode formation. Dev. Biol. 2007, 305:232-245.
26. Kondo S., et al. The medaka rs-3 locus required for scale development encodes ectodysplasin-A receptor. Curr. Biol. 2001, 11:1202-1206.
27. Atukorala A.D., et al. Scale and tooth phenotypes in medaka with a mutated ectodysplasin-A receptor: implications for the evolutionary origin of oral and pharyngeal teeth. Arch. Histol. Cytol. 2010, 73:139-148.
28. Harris M.P., et al. Zebrafish eda and edar mutants reveal conserved and ancestral roles of ectodysplasin signaling in vertebrates. PLoS Genet. 2008, 4:e1000206.
29. Mikkola M.L. TNF superfamily in skin appendage development. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2008, 19:219-230.
30. Kumar A., et al. The ectodermal dysplasia receptor activates the nuclear factor-kappaB, JNK, and cell death pathways and binds to ectodysplasin A. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276:2668-2677.
31. Elomaa O., et al. Ectodysplasin is released by proteolytic shedding and binds to the EDAR protein. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2001, 10:953-962.
32. Tucker A.S., et al. Edar/Eda interactions regulate enamel knot formation in tooth morphogenesis. Development 2000, 127:4691-4700.
33. Yan M., et al. Two-amino acid molecular switch in an epithelial morphogen that regulates binding to two distinct receptors. Science 2000, 290:523-527.
34. Wisniewski S.A., Trzeciak W.H. A new mutation resulting in the truncation of the TRAF6-interacting domain of XEDAR: a possible novel cause of hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia. J. Med. Genet. 2012, 49:499-501.
35. Newton K., et al. Myodegeneration in EDA-A2 transgenic mice is prevented by XEDAR deficiency. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2004, 24:1608-1613.
36. Koppinen P., et al. Signaling and subcellular localization of the TNF receptor Edar. Exp. Cell Res. 2001, 269:180-192.
37. Morlon A., et al. TAB2, TRAF6 and TAK1 are involved in NF-kappaB activation induced by the TNF-receptor, Edar and its adaptator Edaradd. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2005, 14:3751-3757.
38. Schmidt-Ullrich R., et al. NF-kappaB transmits Eda A1/EdaR signalling to activate Shh and cyclin D1 expression, and controls post-initiation hair placode down growth. Development 2006, 133:1045-1057.
39. Ohazama A., et al. Traf6 is essential for murine tooth cusp morphogenesis. Dev. Dyn. 2004, 229:131-135.
40. Naito A., et al. TRAF6-deficient mice display hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99:8766-8771.
41. Zonana J., et al. A novel X-linked disorder of immune deficiency and hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia is allelic to incontinentia pigmenti and due to mutations in IKK-gamma (NEMO). Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2000, 67:1555-1562.
42. Pispa J., et al. Edar and Troy signalling pathways act redundantly to regulate initiation of hair follicle development. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2008, 17:3380-3391.
43. Dickson K.M., et al. TRAF6-dependent NF-kB transcriptional activity during mouse development. Dev. Dyn. 2004, 231:122-127.
44. Gilmore T.D., Wolenski F.S. NF-κB: where did it come from and whyα. Immunol. Rev. 2012, 246:14-35.
45. Shifera A.S. The zinc finger domain of IKKγ (NEMO) protein in health and disease. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2010, 14:2404-2414.
46. Lefebvre S., et al. Identification of ectodysplasin target genes reveals the involvement of chemokines in hair development. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2012, 132:1094-1102.
47. Cascallana J.L., et al. Ectoderm-targeted overexpression of the glucocorticoid receptor induces hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia. Endocrinology 2005, 146:2629-2638.
48. Cui C.Y., et al. Inducible mEDA-A1 transgene mediates sebaceous gland hyperplasia and differential formation of two types of mouse hair follicles. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2003, 12:2931-2940.
49. Gaide O., Schneider P. Permanent correction of an inherited ectodermal dysplasia with recombinant EDA. Nat. Med. 2003, 9:614-618.
50. Mustonen T., et al. Ectodysplasin A1 promotes placodal cell fate during early morphogenesis of ectodermal appendages. Development 2004, 131:4907-4919.
51. Jaskoll T., et al. Ectodysplasin receptor-mediated signaling is essential for embryonic submandibular salivary gland development. Anat. Rec. A: Discov. Mol. Cell. Evol. Biol. 2003, 271:322-331.
52. Melnik M., et al. Salivary gland branching morphogenesis: a quantitative systems analysis of the Eda/Edar/NFkappaB paradigm. BMC Dev. Biol. 2009, 9:32.
53. Mikkola M.L. The Edar subfamily in hair and exocrine gland development. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2011, 691:23-33.
54. Voutilainen M., et al. Ectodysplasin regulates hormone-independent mammary ductal morphogenesis via NF-κB. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:5744-5749.
55. Tucker A.S., et al. The activation level of the TNF family receptor, Edar, determines cusp number and tooth number during tooth development. Dev. Biol. 2004, 268:185-194.
56. Kangas A.T., et al. Nonindependence of mammalian dental characters. Nature 2004, 432:211-214.
57. Harjunmaa E., et al. On the difficulty of increasing dental complexity. Nature 2012, 483:324-327.
58. Mou C., et al. Generation of the primary hair follicle pattern. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:9075-9080.
59. Laurikkala J., et al. Regulation of hair follicle development by the TNF signal ectodysplasin and its receptor Edar. Development 2002, 129:2541-2553.
60. Zhang Y., et al. Reciprocal requirements for EDA/EDAR/NF-kappaB and Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathways in hair follicle induction. Dev. Cell 2009, 17:49-61.
61. Häärä O., et al. Ectodysplasin regulates activator-inhibitor balance in murine tooth development through Fgf20 signaling. Development 2012, 139:3189-3199.
62. Barrett R.D., et al. Natural selection on a major armor gene in threespine stickleback. Science 2008, 322:255-257.
63. Le Rouzic A., et al. Strong and consistent natural selection associated with armour reduction in sticklebacks. Mol. Ecol. 2011, 20:2483-2493.
64. Barrett R.D. Adaptive evolution of lateral plates in three-spined stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus: a case study in functional analysis of natural variation. J. Fish Biol. 2010, 77:311-328.
65. Leinonen T., et al. Multiple evolutionary pathways to decreased lateral plate coverage in freshwater threespine sticklebacks. Evolution 2012, 66:3866-3875.
66. Kitano J., et al. Reverse evolution of armor plates in the threespine stickleback. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18:769-774.
67. Knecht A.K., et al. Constraints on utilization of the EDA-signaling pathway in threespine stickleback evolution. Evol. Dev. 2007, 9:141-154.
68. Barrett R.D., et al. Should I stay or should I goα The Ectodysplasin locus is associated with behavioural differences in threespine stickleback. Biol. Lett. 2009, 5:788-791.
69. Sabeti P.C., et al. Genome-wide detection and characterization of positive selection in human populations. Nature 2007, 449:913-918.
70. Carlson C.S., et al. Genomic regions exhibiting positive selection identified from dense genotype data. Genome Res. 2005, 15:1553-1565.
71. Williamson S.H., et al. Simultaneous inference of selection and population growth from patterns of variation in the human genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102:7882-7887.
72. Voight B.F., et al. A map of recent positive selection in the human genome. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4:e72.
73. Tang K., et al. A new approach for using genome scans to detect recent positive selection in the human genome. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5:e171.
74. Myles S., et al. Identification and analysis of high Fst regions from genome-wide SNP data from three human populations. Ann. Hum. Genet. 2008, 72:99-110.
75. Bryk J., et al. Positive selection in East Asians for an EDAR allele that enhances NF-kappaB activation. PLoS ONE 2008, 3:e2209.
76. Fujimoto A., et al. A replication study confirmed the EDAR gene to be a major contributor to population differentiation regarding head hair thickness in Asia. Hum. Genet. 2008, 124:179-185.
77. Kimura R., et al. A common variation in EDAR is a genetic determinant of shovel-shaped incisors. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2009, 85:528-535.
78. Park J.H., et al. Effects of an Asian-specific nonsynonymous EDAR variant on multiple dental traits. J. Hum. Genet. 2012, 57:508-514.
79. Mou C., et al. Enhanced ectodysplasin-A receptor (EDAR) signaling alters multiple fiber characteristics to produce the East Asian hair form. Hum. Mutat. 2008, 29:1405-1411.
80. Cluzeau C., et al. The EDAR370A allele attenuates the severity of hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia caused by EDA gene mutation. Br. J. Dermatol. 2012, 166:678-681.
81. Hoekstra H.E., Coyne J.A. The locus of evolution: evo devo and the genetics of adaptation. Evolution 2007, 61:995-1016.
82. Stern D.L., Orgogozo V. The loci of evolution: how predictable is genetic evolutionα. Evolution 2008, 62:2155-2177.
83. Casal M.L., et al. Significant correction of disease after postnatal administration of recombinant ectodysplasin A in canine X-linked ectodermal dysplasia. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2007, 81:1050-1056.
84. Kowalczyk C., et al. Molecular and therapeutic characterization of anti-ectodysplasin A receptor (EDAR) agonist monoclonal antibodies. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286:30769-30779.
85. Christin P-A., et al. Causes and evolutionary significance of genetic convergence. Trends Genet. 2010, 26:400-405.
86. Martin A., Orgogozo V. The loci of repeated evolution: a catalog of genetic hotspots of phenotypic variation. Evolution 2013, 67:1235-1250.
87. Pantalacci S., et al. Conserved features and evolutionary shifts of the EDA signaling pathway involved in vertebrate skin appendage development. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2008, 25:912-928.
88. Wiens G.D., Glenney G.W. Origin and evolution of TNF and TNF receptor superfamilies. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2011, 35:1324-1335.
89. Dietrich M.R. Richard Goldschmidt: hopeful monsters and other 'heresies'. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2003, 4:68-74.
90. Lexner M.O., et al. X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia. Genetic and dental findings in 67 Danish patients from 19 families. Clin. Genet. 2008, 74:252-259.
91. Clauss F., et al. Dento-craniofacial phenotypes and underlying molecular mechanisms in hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (HED): a review. J. Dent. Res. 2008, 87:1089-1099.
92. Charles C., et al. Distinct impacts of Eda and Edar loss of function on the mouse dentition. PLoS ONE 2009, 4:e4985.
93. Nikopensius T., et al. Non-syndromic tooth agenesis associated with a nonsense mutation in ectodysplasin-A (EDA). J. Dent. Res. 2013, 92:507-511.
94. Gomes Rodrigues H., et al. Roles of dental development and adaptation in rodent evolution. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4:2504. 10.1038/ncomms3504.