Metabolic engineering of the regulators in nitrogen catabolite repression to reduce the production of ethyl carbamate in a model rice wine system

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Volumn 80, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 392-398

  Zhao, Xinrui ^a   Zou, Huijun ^b   Fu, Jianwei ^b   Zhou, Jingwen ^a   Du, Guocheng ^a   Chen, Jian ^a  

^a JIANGNAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Zhejiang Guvuelongshan Shaoxing Wine Company   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOLIC DRINKS; GENETICALLY MODIFIED; NITROGEN CATABOLITE REPRESSION; NUCLEAR LOCALIZATION; NUCLEAR LOCALIZATION SIGNAL; PHOSPHORYLATION SITES; SHAKE FLASK FERMENTATIONS; WILD-TYPE STRAIN;

AMINO ACIDS; BREWERIES; CYTOLOGY; FERMENTATION; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; NITROGEN; UREA; WINE; YEAST;

METABOLISM;

ALCOHOL; BIOACCUMULATION; BIOENGINEERING; CATABOLISM; FOOD SAFETY; GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISM; GROWTH REGULATOR; METABOLISM; NITROGEN; NUMERICAL MODEL; RICE; YEAST;

CHINA;

GLUTAMINE; NITROGEN; UREA; URETHAN;

ARTICLE; CATABOLITE REPRESSION; CHEMISTRY; CHINA; CULTURE MEDIUM; FOOD HANDLING; GENETICS; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MICROBIOLOGY; RICE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; WINE;

CATABOLITE REPRESSION; CHINA; CULTURE MEDIA; FOOD HANDLING; GLUTAMINE; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; NITROGEN; ORYZA SATIVA; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; UREA; URETHANE; WINE;

EID: 84891082530     PISSN: 00992240     EISSN: 10985336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.03055-13     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Shen F, Ying YB, Li BB, Zheng YF, Hu JG. 2011. Prediction of sugars and acids in Chinese rice wine by mid-infrared spectroscopy. Food Res. Int. 44:1521-1527. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2011.03.058.
2. Chen SA, Xu Y. 2010. The influence of yeast strains on the volatile flavour compounds of Chinese rice wine. J. I. Brewing 116:190-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2050-0416.2010.tb00417.x.
3. Fu ML, Liu J, Chen QH, Liu XJ, He GQ, Chen JC. 2010. Determination of ethyl carbamate in Chinese yellow rice wine using high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. Int. J. Food Sci. Tech. 45:1297-1302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2010.02279.x.
4. Lu YM, Lu X, Chen XH, Jiang M, Li C, Dong MS. 2007. A survey of biogenic amines in Chinese rice wines. Food Chem. 100:1424-1428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.11.035.
5. Weber JV, Sharypov VI. 2009. Ethyl carbamate in foods and beverages- a review, p 429-452. In Lichtfouse E (ed), Climate change, intercropping, pest control and beneficial microorganisms, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
6. Forkert PG. 2010. Mechanisms of lung tumorigenesis by ethyl carbamate and vinyl carbamate. Drug Metab. Rev. 42:355-378. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/03602531003611915.
7. Cadranel JF, Legendre C, Desaint B, Delamarre N, Florent C, Levy VG. 1993. Liver disease from surreptitious administration of urethane. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 17:52-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004836-199307000-00015.
8. Lachenmeier DW. 2007. Consequences of IARC re-evaluation of alcoholic beverage consumption and ethyl carbamate on food control. Dtsch. Lebensmitt. Rundsch. 103:307-311.
9. Schehl B, Senn T, Lachenmeier DW, Rodicio R, Heinisch JJ. 2007. Contribution of the fermenting yeast strain to ethyl carbamate generation in stone fruit spirits. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 74:843-850. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-006-0736-4. 10. Coulon J, Husnik JI, Inglis DL, van der Merwe GK, Lonvaud A,
10. Coulon J, Husnik JI, Inglis DL, van der Merwe GK, Lonvaud A, Erasmus DJ, van Vuuren HJJ. 2006. Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to minimize the production of ethyl carbamate in wine. Am. J. Enol. Viticult. 57:113-124.
11. Andrich L, Esti M, Moresi M. 2009. Urea degradation in model wine solutions by free or immobilized acid urease in a stirred bioreactor. J. Agric. Food Chem. 57:3533-3542. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf803962b.
12. Miyagawa K, Sumida M, Nakao M, Harada M, Yamamoto H, Kusumi T, Yoshizawa K, Amachi T, Nakayama T. 1999. Purification, characterization, and application of an acid urease from Arthrobacter mobilis. J. Biotechnol. 68:227-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1656(98)00210-7.
13. Zhao X, Du G, Zou H, Fu J, Zhou J, Chen J. 2013. Progress in preventing the accumulation of ethyl carbamate in alcoholic beverages. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 32:97-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2013.05.009.
14. Monteiro FF, Bisson LF. 1991. Amino acid utilization and urea formation during vinification fermentations. Am. J. Enol. Viticult. 42:199-208.
15. Magasanik B, Kaiser CA. 2002. Nitrogen regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene 290:1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1119(02)00558-9.
16. Bertram PG, Choi JH, Carvalho J, Ai W, Zeng C, Chan TF, Zheng XF. 2000. Tripartite regulation of Gln3p by TOR, Ure2p, and phosphatases. J. Biol. Chem. 275:35727-35733. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M004235200.
17. Kulkarni AA, Abul-Hamd AT, Rai R, El Berry H, Cooper TG. 2001. Gln3p nuclear localization and interaction with Ure2p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 276:32136-32144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M104580200.
18. Rai R, Tate JJ, Nelson DR, Cooper TG. 2013. gln3 mutations dissociate responses to nitrogen limitation (nitrogen catabolite repression) and rapamycin inhibition of TorC1. J. Biol. Chem. 288:2789-2804. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.421826.
19. Magasanik B. 2005. The transduction of the nitrogen regulation signal in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102:16537-16538. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507116102.
20. Godard P, Urrestarazu A, Vissers S, Kontos K, Bontempi G, van Helden J, Andre B. 2007. Effect of 21 different nitrogen sources on global gene expression in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27:3065- 3086. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01084-06.
21. Gietz RD, Woods RA. 2002. Transformation of yeast by lithium acetate/single-stranded carrier DNA/polyethylene glycol method. Methods Enzymol. 350:87-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(02)50957-5.
22. Wach A, Brachat A, Alberti-Segui C, Rebischung C, Philippsen P. 1997. Heterologous HIS3 marker and GFP reporter modules for PCR-targeting in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 13:1065-1075.
23. Sikorski RS, Hieter P. 1989. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 122:19-27.
24. Kuwayama H, Obara S, Morio T, Katoh M, Urushihara H, Tanaka Y. 2002. PCR-mediated generation of a gene disruption construct without the use of DNA ligase and plasmid vectors. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:e2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/30.2.e2.
25. Knorst MT, Neubert R, Wohlrab W. 1997. Analytical methods for measuring urea in pharmaceutical formulations. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 15: 1627-1632. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0731-7085(96)01978-4.
26. Alcarde AR, de Souza LM, Bortoletto AM. 2012. Ethyl carbamate kinetics in double distillation of sugar cane spirit. J. Inst. Brewing 118:27-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jib.14.
27. Calull M, Marcé RM, Borrull F. 1992. Determination of carboxylic acids, sugars, glycerol and ethanol in wine and grape must by ion-exchange highperformance liquid chromatography with refractive index detection. J. Chromatogr. 590:215-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-9673(92)85384-6.
28. Cigic IK, Vodosek TV, Kosmerl T, Strlic M. 2008. Amino acid quantification in the presence of sugars using HPLC and pre-column derivatization with 3-MPA/OPA and FMOC-Cl. Acta Chim. Slov. 55:660-664.
29. Chen EJ, Kaiser CA. 2002. Amino acids regulate the intracellular trafficking of the general amino acid permease of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:14837-14842. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.232591899.
30. Tate JJ, Cooper TG. 2007. Stress-responsive Gln3 localization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is separable from and can overwhelm nitrogen source regulation. J. Biol. Chem. 282:18467-18480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M609550200.
31. Jin YS, Ni H, Laplaza JM, Jeffries TW. 2003. Optimal growth and ethanol production from xylose by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae require moderate D-xylulokinase activity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:495-503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69.1.495-503.2003.
32. Dahabieh MS, Husnik JI, Van Vuuren HJ. 2010. Functional enhancement of sake yeast strains to minimize the production of ethyl carbamate in sake wine. J. Appl. Microbiol. 109:963-973. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04723.x.
33. Park H, Shin M, Woo I. 2001. Antisense-mediated inhibition of arginase (CAR1) gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 92: 481-484. http://dx.doi.org/10.1263/jbb.92.481.
34. Dahabieh MS, Husnik JI, van Vuuren HJJ. 2009. Functional expression of the DUR3 gene in a wine yeast strain to minimize ethyl carbamate in chardonnay wine. Am. J. Enol. Viticult. 60:537-541.