Passivity-based symmetric posture control and the effects of mass distribution and internal impedance on balance

IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 171-176

  Ozawa, Ryuta ^a   Ishizaki, Jun'Ya ^a  

^a RITSUMEIKAN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BALANCE CONTROL METHOD; EXTERNAL DISTURBANCES; INPUT TRANSFORMATION; INTERNAL IMPEDANCE; MASS DISTRIBUTION; MULTIPLE POINTS; SYMMETRIC STRUCTURES; TRANSFORMATION METHODS;

ANTHROPOMORPHIC ROBOTS; COMPUTER SIMULATION;

CONTROLLERS;

EID: 84891062013     PISSN: 21640572     EISSN: 21640580     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HUMANOIDS.2012.6651516     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. B. Stephens. Humanoid push recovery. In Proc. of IEEE-RAS Inter. Conf. Humanoid Robots, pp. 589-595, Pittsburgh, PA, Nov. 2007.
2. J. Pratt, J. Carff, S. Drakunov, and A. Goswami. Capture point: A step toward humanoid push recovery. In Proc. of IEEE-RAS Int. Conf. on Humanoid Robots, pp. 200-207, Genova, Italy, Dec. 2006.
3. T Sugihara. Standing stabilizability and stepping maneuver in planar bipedalism based on the best com-zmp regulator. In Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Robot. and Autom., pp. 1966-1971, Kobe, JAPAN, May 2009.
4. S.-H. Hyon, R. Osu, and Y. Otaka. Integration of multi-level postural balancing on humanoid robots. In Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Robot. and Autom., pp. 1549-1556, Kobe, JAPAN, May 2009.
5. B. J. Stephens and C. G. Atkeson. Dynamic balance force control for compliant humanoid robots. In Proc. of IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 1248-1255, Taipei, Taiwan, Oct. 2010.
6. S.-K. Yun and A. Goswami. Momentum-based reactive stepping controller on level and non-level ground for humanoid robot push recovery. In Proc. of IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 3943-3950, San Francisco, CA, USA, Sep. 2011.
7. M Vukobratovic and B. Borovac. Zero-moment point - Thirty five years of its life. Int. J. of Humanoid Robotics, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 157-173, 2004.
8. S. Kajita, F. Kanehiro, K. Kaneko, K. Fujiwara, K. Yokoi, and H. Hirukawa. Biped walking pattern generation by a simple threedimensional inverted pendulum model. Advanced Robotics, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 131-147, 2003.
9. K. Mitobe and Y. Capi, G. Nasu. Control of walking robots based on manipulation of the zero moment point. Robotica, Vol. 18, pp. 651-657, 2000. (Pubitemid 32069775)
10. B. Siciliano and O. Khatib, editors. Springer handbook of Robotics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2008.
11. A. Sano and J. Furusho. Realization of natural dynamic walking using the angular momentum information. In Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Robot. and Autom., pp. 1476-1481, Cincinnati, OH, May 1990.
12. S.-H. Lee and A. Goswami. Ground reaction force control at each foot: A momentum-based humanoid balance controller for non-level and non-stationary ground. In Proc. of IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 3157-3162, Taipei, Taiwan, Oct. 2010.
13. S. H. Hyon, J. G. Hale, and G. Cheng. Full-body compliant humanhumanoid interaction: Balancing in the presence of unknown external force. IEEE Trans. on Robotics, Vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 884-898, 2007. (Pubitemid 47577965)
14. M. Takegaki and S. Arimoto. A new feedback method for dynamic control of manipulators. ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, Vol. 102, pp. 119-125, 1981. (Pubitemid 12447191)
15. S.-H. Hyon. Compliant terrain adaptation for biped humanoids without measuring ground surface and contact forces. IEEE Trans. on Robotics, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 171-178, 2009.
16. L. Sentis, J. Park, and O. Khatib. Compliant control of multicontact and center-of-mass behaviors in humanoid robots. IEEE Trans. on Robotics, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 483-501, 2010.
17. C. Ott, M. A. Roa, and G. Hirzinger. Posture and balance control for biped robots based on contact force optimization. In Proc. of IEEERAS Int. Conf. on Humanoid Robots, pp. 26-33, Bled, Slovenia, Oct. 2011.
18. R. Ozawa and J. Ishizaki. Passivity-based control for a biped robot. In Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Robot. and Autom., pp. 550-556, Shanghai, CHINA, May 2011.
19. S.-H. Hyon and K. Fujimoto. Invariant manifold of symmetric orbits for globally optimal biped locomotion. In Proc. 9th Inter. Symp. on Robot Control, pp. 619-626, Gifu, Japan, Sep. 2009.
20. M. W. Spong. Controlled symmetries and passive walking. In Proc. of IFAC World Congress, Barcelona, Spain, July 2002.
21. F.B. Horak and L.M. Nashner. Central programming of postural movements: Adaptation to altered support-surfance configurations. J. of Neurophysiology, Vol. 55, No. 6, pp. 1369-1381, 1986. (Pubitemid 16068472)
22. A. Goswami. Postural stability of biped robots and the foot-rotation indicator (FRI) point. The International Journal of Robotics Research, Vol. 18, No. 6, pp. 523-533, 1999.
23. J. Kerr and B. Roth. Analysis of multifingered hands. The International Journal of Robotics Research, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 3-17, 1986.
24. S. Arimoto. Control theory of non-linear mechanical systems: A passivity-based and circuit-theoretic approach. Oxford Science Publications. Oxford University Press, 1996.
25. S. Takao, T. Ikeda, and T. Mita. Walking control for 3D biped using variable constraint control. In Proc. of SICE Annual Conference, pp. 2549-2552, Aug. 2002.
26. K. Kaneko, F. Kanehiro, M. Morisawa, K. Miura, S. Nakaoka, and S. Kajita. Cybernetic human HPR-4C. In Proc. of IEEE-RAS Int. Conf. on Humanoid Robots, pp. 7-17, Paris, France, Dec. 2009.
27. F. Kanehiro, K. Fujiwara, S. Kajita, K. Yokoi, K. Kaneko, H. Hirukawa, Y. Nakamura, and K. Yamane. Open architecture humanoid robotics platform. In Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Robot. and Autom., pp. 24-30, Washington, DC, May 2002. (Pubitemid 34916573)