Sequences and Processes in Language Learning

The Handbook of Language Teaching

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 81-105

  Ortega, Lourdes ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

Contrastive analysis approach; Developmental sequences of negation; Five generalizations and Coda interlanguage development and instruction; Interlanguage development very systematic; Interlanguages as natural languages; Language learning and interlanguage; Language teaching and learning first language (L1) and target language (L2); Negation stages reflecting internal grammar representations; Restructuring self reorganization of grammar knowledge representations; Sequences and processes for second and foreign language teaching

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890982104     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781444315783.ch6     Document Type: Chapter

References (77)

1. Andersen, R. W. (1984a). The one-to-one principle of interlanguage construction. Language Learning 34, 77-95.
2. Andersen, R. W. (1984b). Whats gender good for, anyway? In R. W. Andersen (ed.), Second languages: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 77-100). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
3. Andersen, R. W. (1991). Developmental sequences: The emergence of aspect marking in second language acquisition. In T. Huebner & C. A. Ferguson (eds.), Crosscurrentsin language acquisition research and linguistic theories (pp. 305-23). Amsterdam: JohnBejamins.
4. Andersen, R. W. & Shirai, Y. (1994). Discourse motivations for some cognitive acquisition principles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16, 133-56.
5. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1995). The interaction of pedagogy and natural sequences in the acquisition of tense and aspect. In F. Eckman, D. Highland, P. Lee, J. Mileham, & R. Weber (eds.), Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy (pp. 151-68). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2000). Tense and aspect in second language acquisition: Form, meaning, and use. Malden, MA: Blackwell.102 Lourdes- Ortega
7. Batistella, E. L. (1996). The logic of markedness. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Byrnes, H. & Sinicrope, C. (2008). Advancedness and the development of relativization inL2 German: A curriculum-based longitudinal study. In L. Ortega & H. Byrnes (eds.),The longitudinal study of advanced L2 capacities (pp. 109-38). New York: LawrenceErlbaum Taylor & Francis.
9. Cadierno, T. (2000). The acquisition of Spanish grammatical aspect by Danish advanced language learners. Spanish Applied Linguistics 4, 1-53.
10. Camps, J. (2002). Aspectual distinctions in Spanish as a foreign language: The early stages of oral production. International Review of Applied Linguistics 40, 179-210.
11. Cancino, H., Rosansky, E., & Schumann, J. (1978). The acquisition of English negatives and interrogatives by native Spanish speakers. In E. Hatch (ed.), Second language acquisition: A book of readings (pp. 207-30). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
12. Clahsen, H. (2006). Dual-mechanism morphology. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, vol. 4. Oxford: Elsevier.
13. Corder, P. (1981). Error analysis and interlanguage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Croteau, K. C. (1995). Second language acquisition of relative clause structures by learners of Italian. In F. R. Eckman, D. Highland, P. W. Lee, J. Mileham, & R. R. Weber (eds.),Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy (pp. 115-28). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A Dynamic Systems Theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 10, 7-21.
16. Diessel, H. & Tomasello, M. (2005). A new look at the acquisition of relative clauses. Language 81, 882-906.
17. Doughty, C. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study of ESL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13, 431-69.
18. Ellis, N. C. (2006). Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguis-tics 27, 1-24.
19. Ellis, R. (1989). Are classroom and naturalistic acquisition the same? A study of the classroom acquisition of German word order rules. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 11, 305-28.
20. Fox, B. A. & Thompson, S. A. (2007). Relative clauses in English conversation: Relativizers, frequency, and the notion of construction. Studies in Language 31, 293-326.
21. Goldschneider, J. & DeKeyser, R. M. (2001). Explaining the "natural order of L2 mor pheme acquisition" in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. LanguageLearning 51, 1-50.
22. Han, Z. (2000). Persistence of the implicit influence of NL: The case of the pseudo-passive. Applied Linguistics 21, 78-105.
23. Han, Z. (2004). Fossilization in adult second language acquisition. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
24. Han, Z. (2006). Fossilization: Can grammaticality judgment be a reliable source of evid-ence? In Z. Han & T. Odlin (eds.), Studies of fossilization in second language acquisition (pp. 56-82). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
25. Hu, X. & Liu, C. (2007). Restrictive relative clauses in English and Korean learners' second language Chinese. Second Language Research 23, 263-87.
26. Huebner, T. (1983). A longitudinal analysis of the acquisition of English. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.
27. Hyltenstam, K. (1984). The use of typological markedness conditions as predictors in second language acquisition: The case of pronominal copies in relative clauses. In R. W. Andersen (ed.), Second languages: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 39-58). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
28. Hyltenstam, K. (1987). Markedness, language universals, language typology, and second language acquisition. In C. Pfaff (ed.), First and second language acquisition processes (pp. 55-78). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
29. Jansen, L. (2008). Acquisition of German word order in tutored learners: A cross-sectional study in a wider theoretical context. Language Learning 58, 185-231.
30. Jia, G. & Fuse, A. (2007). Acquisition of English grammatical morphology by native Mandarin-speaking Children and adolescents: Age-related differences. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research 50, 1280-99.
31. Keenan, E. & Comrie, B. (1977). Noun phrase acessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8, 63-99.
32. Kellerman, E. (1985). If at first you do succeed. In S. M. Gass & C. Madden (eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 345-53). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
33. Klein, W. & Perdue, C. (1997). The basic variety (or: Couldn't natural languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research 14, 301-47.
34. Krashen, D. (1977). Some issues relating to the Monitor Model. In H. D. Brown, C. A. Yorio, & R. H. Crymes (eds.), On TESOL '77. Teaching and learning English as a second language: Trends in research and practice (pp. 144-58). Washington, DC: TESOL.
35. Lardiere, D. (2007). Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition: A case study. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36. Larsen-Freeman, D. (1976). An explanation for the morpheme acquisition order of second language learners. Language Learning 26, 125-34.
37. Lee, E. & Kim, H.-Y. (2007). On crosslinguistic variations in imperfective aspect: The case of L2 Korean. Language Learning 57, 651-85.
38. Leung, Y.-K. I. (2006). Verb morphology in L2A vs. L3A: The representation of regular and irregular past participles in English-Spanish and Chinese-English-Spanish inter-languages. In S. Foster-Cohen, M. M. Krajnovic, & J. M. Djigunovic (eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook 6 (pp. 27-56). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
39. Lightbown, P. M. (1983). Exploring the relationships between developmental and instructional sequences in L2 acquisition. In H. W. Seliger & M. H. Long (eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 217-45).
40. Long, M. H. (1988). Instructed interlanguage development. In L. Beebe (ed.), Issues in secondlanguage acquisition: Multiple perspectives (pp. 115-41).
41. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. Long, M. H. (2003). Stabilization and fossilization in interlanguage development. InC. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 487-535). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
42. Long, M. H. & Sato, C. J. (1984). Methodological issues in interlanguage studies: An interactionist perspective. In A. Davies, C. Criper, & A. Howatt (eds.), Interlanguage (pp. 253-79). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
43. Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction, and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21, 557-87.
44. Marslen-Wilson, W. & Tyler, L. K. (1998). Rules, representations, and the English pasttense. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences 2, 428-35.
45. Mayberry, R. I. (in press). Second language learning of sign languages. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 2nd edn., vol. 10. Oxford: Elsevier.
46. Meisel, J., Clahsen, H., & Pienemann, M. (1981). On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 3, 109-35.
47. Ortega, L. (2007). Second language learning explained? SLA across nine contemporarytheories. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: Anintroduction (pp. 221-46). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
48. Ortega, L. (2009). Understanding second language acquisition. London: Hodder Arnold.
49. Oshita, H. (2000). What is happened may not be what appears to be happening: A corpusstudy of "passive" unaccusatives in L2 English. Second Language Research 16, 293-324.
50. Pavesi, M. (1986). Markedness, discoursal modes, and relative clause formation in aformal and an informal context. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 8, 38-55.
51. Pica, T. (1985). Linguistic simplicity and learnability: Implications for language syllabus design. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (eds.), Modelling and assessing secondlanguage acquisition (pp. 137-51). Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
52. Pienemann, M. (1984). Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 6, 186-214.
53. Pienemann, M. (1985). Learnability and syllabus construction. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (eds.), Modelling and assessing second language acquisition (pp. 23-76). Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
54. Pienemann, M. (1989). Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypo-theses. Applied Linguistics 10, 52-79.
55. Pienemann, M. (1998). Language processing and second language development: Processability Theory. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
56. Pienemann, M. (ed.) (2005). Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
57. Pienemann, M., Johnston, M., & Brindley, G. (1988). Constructing an acquisition-based procedure for second language assessment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 10, 217-43.
58. Reali, F. & Christiansen, M. H. (2007). Processing of relative clauses is made easier by frequency of occurrence. Journal of Memory and Language 57, 1-23.
59. Sato, C. (1990). The syntax of conversation in interlanguage development. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
60. Schachter, J. (1974). An error in error analysis. Language Learning 24, 205-14.
61. Schumann, J. (1978). Second language acquisition: The pidginization hypothesis. In E. Hatch (ed.), Second language acquisition: A book of readings (pp. 256-71). Rowley, MA:Newbury House.
62. Schumann, J. (1979). The acquisition of English negation by speakers of Spanish: A review of the literature. In R. W. Andersen (ed.), The acquisition and use of Spanish and English as first and second languages (pp. 3-32). Washington, DC: TESOL.
63. Schumann, J. (1987). The expression of temporality in basilang speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 9, 21-41.
64. Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics 10, 219-31
65. Sharwood Smith, M. & Kellerman, E. (1989). The interpretation of second language output. In H. W. Dechert & M. Raupach (eds.), Transfer in language production(pp. 217-36). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
66. Shirai, Y. & Ozeki, H. (2007). The L2 acquisition of relative clauses in East Asian languages. Special issue of Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29, 155-374.
67. Siegel, J. (2006). Links between SLA and Creole studies: Past and present. In C. Lefebvre, L. White, & C. Jourdan (eds.), L2 acquisition and creole genesis (pp. 15-46). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
68. Spada, N. & Lightbown, P. M. (1993). Instruction and the development of questions in the L2 classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15, 205-21.
69. Spada, N. & Lightbown, P. M. (1999). Instruction, first language influence, and develop-mental readiness in second language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal 83, 1-22.
70. Stauble, A. E. (1978). The process of decreolization: A model for second language development. Language Learning 28, 29-54.
71. Stockwell, R., Bowen, J., & Martin, J. (1965). The grammatical structures of English and Spanish. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
72. Sugaya, N. & Shirai, Y. (2007). The acquisition of progressive and resultative meanings of the imperfective aspect marker by L2 learners of Japanese: Trasfer, universals, or multiple factors. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29, 1-38.
73. Tarallo, F. & Myhill, J. (1983). Interference and natural language processing in second language acquisition. Language Learning 33, 55-73.
74. von Stutterheim, C. & Klein, W. (1987). A concept-oriented approach to second language studies. In C. W. Pfaff (ed.), First and second language acquisition (pp. 191-205). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
75. White, L. (2003). Second language acquisition and Universal Grammar. New York: Cambridge University Press.
76. Wilkins, D. A. (1976). Notional syllabuses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
77. Zobl, H. (1982). A direction for contrastive analysis: The comparative study of develop-mental sequences. TESOL Quarterly 16, 169-83.