On crosslinguistic variations in imperfective aspect: The case of L2 Korean

Language Learning

Volumn 57, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 651-685

  Lee, Eunhee ^a   Kim, Hae Young ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Congruence principle; Cross linguistic variation; Imperfective markers; Individual variation; Input distribution and frequency; Korean tense and aspect; L2 tense and aspect; One to one principle; Prototype account

Indexed keywords

EID: 35448965697     PISSN: 00238333     EISSN: 14679922     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00431.x     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Ahn, Y. (1995). The aspectual and temporal system of Korean: from the perspective of the two-component theory of aspect. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
2. Andersen, R. W. (1989). La adquisición de la morfología verbal. Lingüística, 1, 89 141.
3. Andersen, R. W. (1991). Developmental sequence: The emergence of aspect marking in second language acquisition. In T. Huebner & C. A. Ferguson (Eds Crosscurrents in second language acquisition and linguistic theories (pp. 305 324). Amsterdam : Benjamins.
4. Andersen, R. W. (1993). Four operating principles and input distribution as explanation for underdeveloped and mature morphological systems. In K. Hyltenstam & A. Viberg (Eds Progression and regression in language: Sociocultural, neuropsychological, and linguistic perspectives (pp. 309 339). New York : Cambridge University Press.
5. Andersen, R. W., & Shirai, Y. (1996). The primacy of aspect in first and second language acquisition: The pidgin-creole connection. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 527 570). San Diego : Academic Press.
6. Ayoun, D. (2004). The effectiveness of written recasts in the second language acquisition of aspectual distinction in French: A follow-up study. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 31 55.
7. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1999). From morpheme studies to temporal semantics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 341 382.
8. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2000). Tense and aspect in second language acquisition: Form, meaning, and use. Malden, MA : Blackwell.
9. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2005). Tracking the elusive imperfect in adult L2 acquisition: Refining the hunt. In P. Kempchinsky & R. Slabakova (Eds Aspectual Inquiries (pp. 397 419). Amsterdam : Springer.
10. Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Bergstrom, A. (1996). Acquisition of tense and aspect in second language and foreign language learning: Learner narratives in ESL and EFL. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 52, 308 330.
11. Bickerton, D. (1981). Roots of language. Ann Arbor, MI : Karoma.
12. Bronckart, J. P., & Sinclair, H. (1973). Time, tense and aspect. Cognition, 2, 107 130.
13. Bybee, J. L. (1985). Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam : Benjamins.
14. Bybee, J. L., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W. (1994). The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
15. Choe, H. B. (1971). Wurimalpon 'our grammar.' Seoul : Cengumsa.
16. Clark, E. V. (1987). The principle of contrast: A constraint on language acquisition. In B. MacWhinney (Ed Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 1 33). Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
17. Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
18. Giacalone-Ramat, A. (2002). How do learners acquire the classical three categories of temporality? In R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp. 221 247). Amsterdam : Benjamins.
19. Hong, K. (1991). Argument selection and case marking in Korean. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.
20. Ishida, M. (2004). Effects of recasts on the acquisition of the aspectual form -te i-(ru) by learners of Japanese as a foreign language. Language Learning, 54, 311 394.
21. Kaplan, M. (1987). Developmental patterns of past tense acquisition among foreign learners of French. In B. VanPatten, T. Dvorak, & J. Lee (Eds Foreign language learning: A research perspective (pp. 52 60). New York : Newbury House.
22. Kim, H. Y., & Lee, E. H. (2007). The development of tense and aspect morphology in L2 Korean. In J. Song (Ed Frontiers of Korean language acquisition (pp. 91 126). London : Saffron Books.
23. Kim, N. (1986). The progressive in Korean. In N. Kim (Ed Studies in Korean language and linguistics (pp. 97 117). Los Angeles : East Asian Studies Center, University of Southern California.
24. Kim, Y. (1993). The resultative progressive in Korean. Papers of the 29th Regional Meeting. Chicago Lingusitic Society, 251 265.
25. Koyama, S. (1998). Nihongo gakushuusha ni yoru tensu asupekuto no shuutoku The acquisition of tense-aspect by learners of Japanese Paper presented at the Ninth National Meeting of the Japanese Association of Second Language Acquisition, Nagoya, Japan.
26. Lee, E. H. (2006). Stative progressives in Korean and English. Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 695 717.
27. Lee, E. J. (2001). Interlanguage development by two Korean speakers of English with a focus on temporality. Language Learning, 51, 591 633.
28. Lee, H. S. (1991). Tense, aspect and modality: A discourse-pragmatic analysis of verbal suffixes in Korean from a typological perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
29. Lee, K. (1993). A Korean grammar on semantic-pragmatic principles. Seoul : Hankwuk Mwunhwasa.
30. Li, P., & Shirai, Y. (2000). The acquisition of lexical and grammatical aspect. Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter.
31. Martin, S. (1992). A reference grammar of Korean. Tokyo : Charles E. Tuttle Company.
32. Robison, R. E. (1995). The aspect hypothesis revisited: A cross-sectional study of tense and aspect marking in interlanguage. Applied Linguistics, 16, 344 370.
33. Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 192 233.
34. Shibata, M. (1999). The use of Japanese tense-aspect morphology in L2 discourse narratives. Acquisition of Japanese as a Second Language, 2, 68 102.
35. Shirai, Y. (1991). Primacy of aspect in language acquisition: Simplified input and prototype. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
36. Shirai, Y. (1998). Where the progressive and resultative meet: Imperfective aspect in Japanese, Korean, Chinese, and English. Studies in Language, 22, 661 692.
37. Shirai, Y., & Andersen, R. W. (1995). The acquisition of tense-aspect morphology: A prototype account. Language, 71, 743 762.
38. Shirai, Y., & Kurono, A. (1998). The acquisition of tense-aspect marking in Japanese as a second language. Language Learning, 48, 245 279.
39. Shirai, Y., & Nishi, Y. (2002). Lexicalization of aspectual structures in English and Japanese. In G. Ramat (Ed Typology and second language acquisition pp. 267 290). Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter.
40. Slobin, D. (2002). Language evolution, acquisition and diachrony: Probing the parallels. In T. Givón & B. F. Malle (Eds The evolution of language out of pre-language (pp. 275 392). Amsterdam : Benjamins.
41. Smith, C. S. (1991). The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht : Kluwer.
42. Smith, C. S. (1997). The parameter of aspect (2nd ed Dordrecht : Kluwer.
43. Sugaya, N. (2001). Nihongo gakushuusha no asupkuto shuutoku ni kansuru juudan kenkyuu: teiru o chuushin ni A longitudinal study on the acquisition of aspect by learners of Japanese: focusing on -teiru Unpublished master's thesis. Ochanomizu University, Tokyo.
44. Sugaya, N., & Shirai, Y. (2007). The acquisition of progressive resultative meaning of the imperfective aspect marker by L2 learners of Japanese: Transfer, Universal, or multiple factors? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29 (1) 1 38.
45. Taylor, J. (2005). Linguistic categorization: Prototypes in linguistic theory. Oxford : Oxford University Press.