Introduction

Studies in Second Language Acquisition

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 155-167

  Shirai, Yasuhiro ^a   Ozeki, Hiromi ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247624639     PISSN: 02722631     EISSN: 14701545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S027226310707009X     Document Type: Editorial

References (66)

1. Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1982). Functionalist approaches to grammar. In E. Wanner & L. Gleitman (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art (pp. 173-218). New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Braidi, S. M. (1999). The acquisition of second-language syntax. London: Arnold.
3. Bybee, J. L. (1985). Morphology. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
4. Clancy, P., Lee, H., & Zoh, M. (1986). Processing strategies in the acquisition of RCs: Universal principles and language-specific relativizations. Cognition, 14, 225-262.
5. Comrie, B. (1996). The unity of noun-modifying clauses in Asian languages. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Pan-Asiatic Linguistics (pp. 1077-1088). Salaya, Thailand: Institute of Language and Culture for Rural Development, Mahidol University of Salaya.
6. Comrie, B. (1998). Attributive clauses in Asian languages: Towards an areal typology. In W. Boeder, C. Schroeder, K. H. Wagner, & W. Wildgen (Eds.), Sprache in Raum und Zeit: In memoriam Johannes Bechert, Band 2 (pp. 51-60). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
7. Comrie, B. (2002). Typology and language acquisition: The case of relative clauses. In A. Giacalone Ramat (Ed.), Typology and second language acquisition (pp. 19-37). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
8. Croft, W. (2001). Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Croteau, K. C. (1995). Second language acquisition of relative clause structures by learners of Italian. In F. R. Eckman, D. Highland, P. W. Lee, J. Mileham, & R. R. Weber (Eds.), Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy (pp. 115-128). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Diessel, H., & Tomasello, M. (2000). The development of relative clauses in spontaneous child speech. Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 131-151.
11. Diessel, H., & Tomasello, M. (2005). A new look at the acquisition of relative clauses. Language, 81, 1-25.
12. Doughty, C. J. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 431-469.
13. Eckman, F. R. (1977). Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis. Language Learning, 27, 315-330.
14. Eckman, F. R. (2004a). Universals, innateness and explanation in second language acquisition. Studies in Language, 28, 682-703.
15. Eckman, F. R. (2004b). Author's response: 'External' universals and explanation in SLA. Studies in Language, 28, 707-709.
16. Eckman, F. R., Bell, L., & Nelson, D. (1988). On the generalization of relative clause instruction in the acquisition of English as a second language. Applied Linguistics, 9, 1-20.
17. Ellis, R. (1985). Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Gass, S. (1979). Language transfer and universal grammatical relations. Language Learning, 29, 327-344.
20. Gass, S., & Selinker, L. (2001). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Hakuta, K. (1981). Grammatical description versus configurational arrangement in language acquisition: The case of relative clauses in Japanese. Cognition, 9, 197-236.
22. Hamilton, R. L. (1995). The noun phrase accessibility hierarchy in SLA: Determining the basis for its developmental effects. In F. R. Eckman, D. Highland, P. W. Lee, J. Mileham, & R. R. Weber (Eds.), Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy (pp. 101-114). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Hansen-Strain, L., & Strain, J. E. (1989). Variation in the relative clause of Japanese learners. JALT Journal, 11, 211-237.
24. Hawkins, J. A. (1994). A performance theory of order and constituency New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Hawkins, J. A. (1999). Processing complexity and filler-gap dependencies across grammars. Language, 75, 244-285.
26. Hawkins, R. (1989). Do second language learners acquire restrictive relative clauses on the basis of relational or configurational information? The acquisition of French subject, direct object and genitive restrictive relative clauses by second language learners. Second Language Research, 5, 158-188.
27. Hirose, Y. (2006). Processing of relative clauses in Japanese: Coping with multiple ambiguities. In M. Nakayama, R. Mazuka, & Y. Shirai (Eds.), Handbook of East Asian psycholinguistics: Vol. 2. Japanese (pp. 264-269). New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Hopper, P. J. (1997). When 'grammar' and discourse clash: The problem of source conflicts. In J. Bybee, J. Hyman, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Essays on language function and language type: Dedicated to Talmy Givón (pp. 231-247). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
29. Hsiao, F., & Gibson, E. (2003). Processing relative clauses in Chinese. Cognition, 90, 3-27.
30. Hyltenstam, K. (1977). Implicational patterns in interlanguage syntax variation. Language Learning, 27, 383-411.
31. Hyltenstam, K. (1984). The use of typological markedness conditions as predictors in second language acquisition: The case of pronominal copies in relative clauses. In R. W. Andersen (Ed.), Second languages: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 39-60). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
32. Izumi, S. (2003). Processing difficulty in comprehension and production of relative clauses by learners of English as a second language. Language Learning, 53, 285-323.
33. Jeon, K. (2004). Interaction-driven learning: Characterizing linguistic development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington DC.
34. Jin, H.-G. (1994). Topic-prominence and subject-prominence in L2 acquisition: Evidence of English-to-Chinese typological transfer. Language Learning, 44, 101-122.
35. Keenan, E. (1975). Variation in Universal Grammar. In R. Fasold & R. Shuy (Eds.), Analyzing variation in language (pp. 136-148). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
36. Keenan, E., & Comrie, B. (1977). Noun phrase accessibility and Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 63-99.
37. Keenan, E., & Hawkins, S. (1987). The psychological validity of the accessibility hierarchy. In E. Keenan (Ed.), Universal Grammar: Fifteen essays (pp. 60-85). London: Routledge.
38. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. H. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman.
39. Lin, C.-J. C., Fong, S., & Bever, T. G. (2005). Constructing filler-gap dependencies in Chinese possessor relative clauses. In Proceedings of the 19th Asia-Pacific Conference on Language, Information, and Computation (pp. 143-154). Taipei: Academia Sinica.
40. Long, M. H., & Doughty, C. J. (2003). SLA and cognitive science. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 866-870). Oxford: Blackwell.
41. Mak, W., Vonk, W., & Schriefers, H. (2002). The influence of animacy on relative clause processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 50-68.
42. Matsumoto, Y. (1988). Semantics and pragmatics of noun-modifying constructions in Japanese. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 14, 166-175.
43. Matsumoto, Y. (1997). Noun-modifying constructions in Japanese: A frame-semantic approach. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
44. Matthews, S., & Yip, V. (2002). Relative clauses in early bilingual development: Transfer and universals. In A. Giacalone Ramat (Ed.), Typology and second language acquisition (pp. 39-81). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
45. McClelland, J. L., & Patterson, K. (2002). Rules or connections in past-tense inflections: What does the evidence rule out? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 465-472.
46. Mellow, D. (2006). The emergence of second language syntax: A case study of the acquisition of relative clauses. Applied Linguistics, 27, 620-644.
47. Mitchell, R., & Myles, F. (2004). Second language learning theories 2nd ed.). London: Arnold.
48. Miyamoto, E., & Nakamura, M. (2003). Subject/object asymmetries in the processing of RCs in Japanese. In G. Garding & M. Tsujimura (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 342-355). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
49. O'Grady, W., Lee, M., & Choo, M. (2003). A subject-object asymmetry in the acquisition of relative clauses in Korean as a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 433-448.
50. Ozeki, H. (2004). Nihongo gakusyuusya no rentai syuusyoku koozoo syuutoku katei: Syuusyokusetu no zyootaisei no kanten kara [Does a modifier's stativity predict developmental sequence of noun-modifying construction in L2 Japanese?]. Nihongo Kyooiku [Journal of Japanese Language Teaching], 121, 36-45.
51. Ozeki, H. (2005). Daiiti daini gengo ni okeru nihongo meisi syuusyokusetu no syuutoku katei: Ruikeiron teki apurooti [The acquisition process of Japanese noun-modifying clauses by first and second language learners: A typological approach]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ochanomizu University, Tokyo.
52. Ozeki, H., & Shirai, Y. (2005). Semantic bias in the acquisition of relative clauses in Japanese. In A. Brugos, M. R. Clark-Cotton, & S. Ha (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development: Vol. 2 (pp. 459-470). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
53. Ozeki, H., & Shirai, Y. (2007). The consequences of variation in the acquisition of relative clauses: An analysis of longitudinal production data from five Japanese children. In Y. Matsumoto, D. Oshima, O. Robinson, & P. Sells (Eds.), Diversity in language: Perspectives and implications (pp. 243-270). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
54. Pavesi, M. (1986). Markedness, discoursal models, and relative clause formation in a formal and informal context. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 8, 38-55.
55. Perkins, R. D. (1992). Deixis, grammar, and culture. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
56. Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules. New York: Basic Books.
57. Polio, C., & Gass, S. (1997). Replication and reporting: A commentary. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 499-508.
58. Rutherford, W. (Ed.). (1984). Language universals and second language acquisition. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
59. Schumann, J. H. (1980). The acquisition of English relative clauses by second language learners. In R. C. Scarcella & S. Krashen (Eds.), Research in second language acquisition: Selected papers of the Los Angeles Second Language Research Forum (pp. 118-131). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
60. Shirai, Y., & Kurono, A. (1998). The acquisition of tense-aspect marking in Japanese as a second language. Language Learning, 48, 245-279.
61. Silva, R., & Clahsen, H. (in press). Morphologically complex words in L1 and L2 processing: Evidence from masked priming experiments in English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.
62. Tarallo, F., & Myhill, J. (1983). Interference and natural language in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 33, 55-76.
63. Tavakolian, S. (1981). The conjoined-clause analysis of relative clauses. In S. Tavakolian (Ed.), Language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp. 167-187). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
64. Ullman, M. T. (2005). A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: The declarative/procedural model. In C. Sanz (Ed.), Mind and context in adult second language acquisition: Methods, theory, and practice (pp. 141-178). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
65. White, L. (2004). 'Internal' versus 'external' universals: Commentary on Eckman. Studies in Language, 28, 704-706.
66. Wolfe-Quintero, K. (1992). Learnability and the acquisition of extraction in relative clauses and wh-questions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 39-70.