Testing mitochondrial capture and deep coalescence in amazonian cichlid fishes (Cichlidae: Cichla)

Evolution

Volumn 68, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 256-268

  Willis, Stuart C ^a   Farias, Izeni P ^b   Ortí, Guillermo ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA   (United States)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF AMAZONAS   (Brazil)

^c GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Hybridization; Introgression; Lineage sorting; Species tree

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; CICHLID; COALESCENCE; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; GENETIC VARIATION; HYBRIDIZATION; INTROGRESSION; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM;

AMAZONIA;

BAIRDIELLA RHONCHUS; CICHLA; CICHLA ORINOCENSIS; CICHLIDAE; PISCES;

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ALLELE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CICHLID; CLASSIFICATION; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETICS; HYBRIDIZATION; INTROGRESSION; LINEAGE SORTING; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; SPECIES TREE;

HYBRIDIZATION; INTROGRESSION; LINEAGE SORTING; SPECIES TREE;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; CICHLIDS; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; GENETIC SPECIATION; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC;

EID: 84890887205     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12230     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Akaike, H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Contr. 19:716-723.
2. Arnold, M. L., and N. H. Martin 2009. Adaptation by introgression. J. Biol. 8:82.
3. Bachtrog, D., K. Thornton, A. Clark, and P. Andolfatto 2006. Extensive introgression of mitochondrial DNA relative to nuclear genes in the Drosophila yakuba species group. Evolution 60:292-302.
4. Ballard, J. W. O., and M. C. Whitlock 2004. The incomplete natural history of mitochondria. Mol. Ecol. 13:729-744.
5. Brown, R. P., and Z. Yang 2010. Bayesian dating of shallow phylogenies with a relaxed clock. Syst. Biol. 59:119-131.
6. Buckley, T. R., M. Cordeiro, D. C. Marshall, and C. Simon 2006. Differentiating between hypotheses of lineage sorting and introgression in New Zealand alpine cicadas (Maoricicada Dugdale). Syst. Biol. 55:411-425.
7. Carmago, A., L. J. Avila, M. Morando, and J. W. Sites, Jr. 2012. Accuracy and precision of species trees: effects of locus, individual, and base pair sampling on inference of species trees in lizards of the Liolaemus darwinii group (Squamata, Liolaemidae). Syst. Biol. 61:272-288.
8. Chan, K. M. A., and S. A. Levin 2005. Leaky prezygotic isolation and porous genomes: rapid introgression of maternally inherited DNA. Evolution 59:720-729.
9. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr 2004. Speciation. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
10. Degnan, J. H., and M. S. Rosenberg 2009. Gene tree discordance, phylogenetic inference, and the multispecies coalescent. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24:332-340.
11. Degnan, J. H., and L. A. Salter 2005. Gene tree distributions under the coalescent process. Evolution 59:24-37.
12. Donnelly, M. J., J. Pinto, R. Girod, N. J. Besansky, and T. Lehmann 2004. Revisiting the role of introgression vs shared ancestral polymorphisms as key processes shaping genetic diversity in the recently separated sibling species of the Anopheles gambiae complex. Heredity 92:61-68.
13. Dowling, D. K., U. Friberg, and J. Lindell 2008. Evolutionary implications of non-neutral mitochondrial genetic variation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23:546-554.
14. Dowling, T. E., and C. L. Secor 1997. The role of hybridization and introgression in the diversification of animals. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28:593-619.
15. Drummond, A. J., and A. Rambaut 2007. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol. Biol. 7:214.
16. Eckert, A. J., and B. C. Carstens 2008. Does gene flow destroy phylogenetic signal? The performance of three methods for estimating species phylogenies in the presence of gene flow. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 49:832-842.
17. Edwards, S. V. 2008. Is a new and general theory of molecular systematics emerging? Evolution 63:1-19.
18. Edwards, S. V., and P. Beerli 2000. Gene divergence, population divergence, and the variance in coalescence time in phylogeographic studies. Evolution 54:1839-1854.
19. Edwards, S. V., L. Liu, and D. K. Pearl 2007. High-resolution species trees without concatenation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104:5936-5941.
20. Funk, D. J., and K. E. Omland 2003. Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34:397-423.
21. Galtier, N., B. Nabholz, S. Glemin, and G. D. D. Hurst 2009. Mitochondrial DNA as a marker of molecular diversity: a reappraisal. Mol. Ecol. 18:4541-4550.
22. Good, J., S. Hird, N. Reid, J. R. Demboski, S. J. Steppan, T. R. Martin-Nims, and J. Sullivan 2008. Ancient hybridization and mitochondrial capture between two species of chipmunks. Mol. Ecol. 17:1313-1327.
23. Graur, D., and W. Martin 2004. Reading the entrails of chickens: molecular timescales of evolution and the illusion of precision. Trends Genet. 20:80-86.
24. Heled, J., and A. J. Drummond 2010. Bayesian inference of species tree from multilocus data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27:570-580.
25. Ho, S. Y. W., and M. J. Phillips 2009. Accounting for calibration uncertainty in phylogenetic estimation of evolutionary divergence times. Syst. Biol. 58:367-380.
26. Huang, H., and L. L. Knowles 2009. What is the danger of the anomaly zone for empirical phylogenetics? Syst. Biol. 58:527-536.
27. Hubbs, C. L. 1955. Hybridization between fish in nature. Syst. Zool. 4:1-20.
28. Hudson, R. R., and N. I. Kaplan 1985. Statistical properties of the number of recombination events in the history of a sample of DNA sequences. Genetics 111:147-164.
29. Kishino, H., and M. Hasegawa 1989. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea. J. Mol. Evol. 29:170-179.
30. Knowles, L. L., and D. R. Maddison 2002. Statistical phylogeography. Mol. Ecol. 11:2623-2635.
31. Kullander, S. O., and E. J. G. Ferreira 2006. A review of the South American cichlid genus Cichla, with descriptions of nine new species (Teleostei: Cichlidae). Ichthyol. Expl. Freshwaters 17:289-398.
32. Lee, J. Y., and S. V. Edwards 2008. Divergence across Australia's Carpenterian barrier: statistical phylogeography of the red-backed fairy wren (Malurus melanocephalus). Evolution 62:3117-3134.
33. Linnen, C. R., and B. D. Farrell 2007. Mitonuclear discordance is caused by rampant mitochondrial introgression in Neodiprion (Hymenoptera: Diprionidae) sawflies. Evolution 61:1417-1438.
34. Liu, L., and D. K. Pearl 2007. Species trees from gene trees: reconstructing Bayesian posterior distributions of a species phylogeny using estimated gene tree distributions. Syst. Biol. 56:504-514.
35. Liu, L., D. K. Pearl, R. T. Brumfield, and S. V. Edwards 2008. Estimating species trees using multiple-allele DNA sequence data. Evolution 62:2080-2091.
36. Lopez-Fernandez, H., J. H. Arbour, K. O. Winemiller, and R. L. Honeycutt 2013. Testing for ancient adaptive radiations in Neotropical cichlid fishes. Evolution. doi: 10.1111/evo.12038.
37. Maddison, W., and D. R. Maddison 2008. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 2.5.
38. Maddison, W. P. 1997. Gene trees in species trees. Syst. Biol. 46:523-536.
39. Maddison, W. P., and L. L. Knowles 2006. Inferring phylogeny despite incomplete lineage sorting. Syst. Biol. 55:21-30.
40. Mallet, J. 2005. Hybridization as an invasion of the genome. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20:229-237.
41. Mallet, J., M. Beltran, W. Neukirchen, and M. Linares 2007. Natural hybridization in heliconiine butterflies: the species boundary as a continuum. BMC Evol. Biol. 7:28.
42. McCormack, J. E., H. Huang, and L. L. Knowles 2010. Maximum likelihood estimates of species trees: how accuracy of phylogenetic inference depends upon the divergence history and sampling design. Syst. Biol. 58:501-508.
43. Morando, M., L. J. Avila, J. Baker, and J. W. Sites, Jr. 2004. Phylogeny and phylogeography of the Liolaemus darwinii complex (Squamata: Liolaemidae): evidence for introgression and incomplete lineage sorting. Evolution 58:842-861.
44. Nichols, R. 2001. Gene trees and species trees are not the same. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:358-364.
45. Palumbi, S. R., F. Cipriano, and M. P. Hare 2001. Predicting nuclear gene coalescence from mitochondrial data: the three times rule. Evolution 55:859-868.
46. Pamilo, P., and M. Nei 1988. Relationships between gene trees and species trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5:568-583.
47. Peters, J. L., Y. N. Zhuravlev, I. Fefelov, A. Logie, and K. E. Omland 2007. Nuclear loci and coalescent methods support ancient hybridization as cause of mitochondrial paraphyly between gadwall and falcated duck (Anas spp.). Evolution 61:1992-2006.
48. Pritchard, J. K., M. Stephens, and P. J. Donnelly 2000. Inference of populations structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945-959.
49. Rannala, B., and Z. Yang 2003. Bayes estimation of species divergence times and ancestral population sizes using DNA sequences from multiple loci. Genetics 164:1645-1656.
50. Rozas, J., J. C. Sánchez-DelBarrio, X. Messeguer, and R. Rozas 2003. DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics 19:2496-2497.
51. Shimodaira, H., and M. Hasegawa 1999. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:1114-1116.
52. Stephens, M., N. J. Smith, and P. Donnelly 2001. A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 68:978-989.
53. Swofford, D. L. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
54. Takahata, N. 1989. Gene genealogy in three related populations: consistency probability between gene and population trees. Genetics 122:957-966.
55. Wakeley, J., and J. Hey 1997. Estimating ancestral population parameters. Genetics 145:847-855.
56. Willis, S. C. 2011. Multilocus and parametric analyses of the evolutionary history of the Amazonian peacock cichlids, genus Cichla (Teleostei: Cichlidae). School of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska.
57. Willis, S. C., M. S. Nunes, C. G. Montana, I. P. Farias, and N. R. Lovejoy 2007. Systematics, biogeography, and evolution of the neotropical peacock basses Cichla (Perciformes : Cichlidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 44:291-307.
58. Willis, S. C., M. S. Nunes, C. G. Montana, I. P. Farias, G. Orti, and N. R. Lovejoy 2010. The Casiquiare River acts as a corridor between the Amazonas and Orinoco River basins: biogeographic analysis of the genus Cichla. Mol. Ecol. 19:1014-1030.
59. Willis, S. C., J. Macrander, I. P. Farias, and G. Orti 2012. Simultaneous delimitation of species and quantification of interspecific hybridization in Amazonian peacock cichlids (genus Cichla) using multi-locus data. BMC Evol. Biol. 12.
60. Winemiller, K. O., and S. C. Willis 2010. Biogeography of the Vaupes Arch and Casiquiare River: barriers and passages between the Amazon and Orinoco. Pp. 225-242 in J. Albert and R. E. Reis, eds. Historical biogeography of neotropical freshwater fishes. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.